| 基于CSSCI的文科学者H指数实证研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 丁楠,潘有能,叶鹰.基于CSSCI的文科学者H指数实证研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2009,27(2):55-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 丁楠 潘有能 叶鹰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学公共管理学院信息资源管理系,杭州,310027 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目"h-指数和类h-指数的机理分析与实证研究"(批准号70773101)资助成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从CSSCI中选取文学、历史学、哲学、法学、经济学和图书馆、情报与文献学6个文科学科学者2002-2006年的数据,计算出学者的被引次数C、被引篇数P、篇均被引次数CPP和h指数。分析表明被引次数C与h指数的相关性最大,计算表明对文学和历史学而言Gl nzel-Schubert公式的估计值更接近实际h指数,而其余学科的h指数大多数数据落在Hirsch公式和Egghe-Rousseau公式估计值之间。在所研究的6个文科领域中,Hirsch公式估计值与实际h指数的Pearson相关性较好。
|
| 关 键 词： | h指数 引文分析 文献计量指标 学术评价 CSSCI |
A CSSCI-BASED POSITIVE STUDY ON THE H-INDEX OF SCHOLARS IN HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES |
| |
| Ding Nan,Pan Youneng and Ye Ying.A CSSCI-BASED POSITIVE STUDY ON THE H-INDEX OF SCHOLARS IN HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES[J].Journal of Academic Libraries,2009,27(2):55-60. |
| |
| Authors: | Ding Nan Pan Youneng and Ye Ying |
| |
| Institution: | Ding Nan Pan Youneng Ye Ying |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the data of CSSCI database from 2002 to 2006, the authors choose six fields (Literature, History, Philosophy, Law, Economy, Library and Information and Documentation) and calculate both scholars' traditional bibliometric indicators (papers, citations and citations per paper) and their h-indices. The results show that the Spearman correlations are largest between citations and h-indices. The estimating values on Gl?nzel-Schubert formula are closer to true h-indices in the fields of literature and history, while other values of h-indices fall between Hirsch formula and Egghe-Rousseau formula. And the Pearson correlation between Hirsch computing values and true h-indices looks better in humanities and social sciences. |
| |
| Keywords: | CSSCI |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《大学图书馆学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《大学图书馆学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
