| 对"主义"的批判要适度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈业奎.对"主义"的批判要适度[J].图书馆建设,2008(8). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈业奎 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 信阳师范学院,河南,信阳,464000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对图书馆学而言，“主义研究”非常重要，缺乏“主义”，图书馆学的思考则丧失一种彻底精神和整体思考。图书馆学“主义研究”的实质是“学科研究”，除了受“定量研究”者批评外，还要受到同属于“定性研究”的“领域研究”者的批评。这是一种正常的学术现象，但如果对“主义”批判过度，则会出现学理研究的“浮躁”。所以，对“主义”的批判要适度，简单地否定“主义”，其结论必将失之偏颇，存在“主义”批评的悖论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 图书馆学 定性研究 定量研究 学科研究 领域研究 |
On The Appropriate Criticism of "Doctrine" |
| |
| Chen Yekui.On The Appropriate Criticism of "Doctrine"[J].Library Development,2008(8). |
| |
| Authors: | Chen Yekui |
| |
| Abstract: | For library science,the "doctrine research" is very important,the lack of which will make the thought of library science lose complete spirit and the overall thinking. The "doctrine research" of the library science is practically the "subject research",which is criticized by "qualitative researchers",as well as "field researchers" of "qualitative research". This is the normal academic phenomenon,but the excessive criticism of "doctrine research" will cause the "flippant and impetuous" academic research. Therefore,the criticism of "doctrine research" should be appropriate,the conclusions of simply negating the "doctrine research" will be certainly unfair,and the paradox of criticism will be produced. |
| |
| Keywords: | Library science Qualitative research Quantitative research Subject research Field research |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
