| EBSCO数据库的综合评价——与ProQuest平台的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 雷顺利.EBSCO数据库的综合评价——与ProQuest平台的比较[J].图书馆建设,2008(8). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 雷顺利 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海师范大学,上海,200234 |
| |
| 摘 要： | EBSCO和ProQuest数据库是目前各图书馆常用的外文数据库。通过对EBSCO数据库和ProQuest数据库的内容、检索系统的比较来看,EBSCO数据库的核心期刊收录比率较高、期刊品种较多、保持更新的全文刊较多、全文期刊收录的时间跨度较长,而且其检索功能和技术相对更强大一些,更有利于精确检索,更能体现专业数据库的特殊性。在数据库的使用方面,各个图书馆可根据自己的使用情况核算成本,应选择数据库内容和检索系统收录质量较高、综合优势较强的平台。
|
| 关 键 词： | EBSCO数据库 ProQuest数据库 综合评价 |
The Comprehensive Evaluation of EBSCO Database: Comparing with ProQuest Database |
| |
| Lei Shunli.The Comprehensive Evaluation of EBSCO Database: Comparing with ProQuest Database[J].Library Development,2008(8). |
| |
| Authors: | Lei Shunli |
| |
| Abstract: | EBSCO and ProQuest databases are commonly used foreign language databases. Through the comparison of the EBSCO database and ProQuest database on the content and the retrieval system,it shows that EBSCO database includes much more key periodicals,various journals and full text journals which is keeping updating,and the full text journal inclusion has a longer time span. Moreover,the search functions and technologies are more powerful,which is better for precise retrieval and professional nature of databases. In regard to the use of databases,libraries could account their own costs,choose the platform with higher quality on the content and retrieval system and more comprehensive advantages. |
| |
| Keywords: | EBSCO database ProQuest database Comprehensive evaluation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
