Voters' Attention,Perceived Effects,and Voting Preferences: Negative Political Advertising in the 2006 Ohio Governor's Election |
| |
| Authors: | Jennette Lovejoy Hong Cheng Daniel Riffe |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Communication Studies , University of Portland lovejoy@up.edu;3. School of Journalism , Ohio University;4. School of Journalism and Mass Communication , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
| |
| Abstract: | A statewide survey (N = 564) before Ohio's 2006 gubernatorial election examined political interest, campaign news and advertising attention, and perceived effects of negative political ads. Interest was related to political and negative political advertising attention, which were in turn related to campaign news attention. Candidate preference predicted attention to political and negative political ads; attention to ads significantly predicted perceived effects on self and on others, whereas attention to negative ads significantly predicted third-person differential (other minus self). In addition, individuals polled in this survey admitted that attention to ads and negative ads was having comparable effects on both themselves and others. This finding may be due to the climate surrounding Ohio's gubernatorial race, which instilled a political importance and social desirability that abated the need to disown an effect of negative advertising on oneself. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
