| 关于科技期刊专家审稿超期的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汪全伟,周海慧,黄东杰,林海妹,高锦合.关于科技期刊专家审稿超期的思考[J].编辑学报,2018,30(2):185-187. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汪全伟 周海慧 黄东杰 林海妹 高锦合 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国热带农业科学院科技信息研究所,571101,海口;中国热带农业科学院科技信息研究所,571101,海口;中国热带农业科学院科技信息研究所,571101,海口;中国热带农业科学院科技信息研究所,571101,海口;中国热带农业科学院科技信息研究所,571101,海口 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 海南省科技合作专项资金项目(KJHZ 2015-33)，热带作物科学数据共享分中心运行服务 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 专家评审是科技期刊三审制的核心环节,其中评审时间直接影响期刊的发表周期,然而在实际操作过程中,却常发生专家审稿超期问题.本文通过分析科技期刊专家审稿超期的原因,借此提出相应建议,以期缩短专家评审时间,提高刊物的时效性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技期刊 审稿 超期 |
Reflection for overtime review of sci-tech journal |
| |
| WANG Quanwei,ZHOU Haihui,HUANG Dongjie,LIN Haimei and GAO Jinhe.Reflection for overtime review of sci-tech journal[J].Acta Editologica,2018,30(2):185-187. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Quanwei ZHOU Haihui HUANG Dongjie LIN Haimei and GAO Jinhe |
| |
| Institution: | Tech-sci Information Research Institute, CATAS, 571101, Haikou, China,Tech-sci Information Research Institute, CATAS, 571101, Haikou, China,Tech-sci Information Research Institute, CATAS, 571101, Haikou, China,Tech-sci Information Research Institute, CATAS, 571101, Haikou, China and Tech-sci Information Research Institute, CATAS, 571101, Haikou, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Peer-review is the key part of triditing system in scitech journals,and its time directly affects the publishing period of the journals; However,overtime review often happens during the process of peer review. This paper mainly analyzes the reasons of overtime review,and proposes some strategies to resolve it,in order to shorten the time of peer review and improve the timeliness of scitech journals publishing. |
| |
| Keywords: | sci tech journal peer review overtime review |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
