首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

科技期刊中影子作者和影子审稿专家现象及对策
引用本文:肖骏,程鹏,王淑华.科技期刊中影子作者和影子审稿专家现象及对策[J].编辑学报,2017,29(1):20-22.
作者姓名:肖骏  程鹏  王淑华
作者单位:中国地质大学《地球科学》编辑部,430074,武汉;中国地质大学《地球科学》编辑部,430074,武汉;中国地质大学《地球科学》编辑部,430074,武汉
摘    要:影子作者和影子审稿专家是科研诚信缺失的一个方面,扰乱正常的期刊出版程序,造成学术不端.文章分析影子作者和影子审稿专家现象与危害,提出了科技期刊编辑部加强来稿信息审查,合理使用ORCID、ResearchGate等平台,建立专家数据库等对策,有利于维护科研诚信,重建健康、有序的科研氛围.

关 键 词:科研诚信  不当署名  虚假同行评议  学术不端
收稿时间:2016/7/7 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/7/7 0:00:00

Shadow authors and shadow reviewers hiding in academic journals
XIAO Jun,CHENG Peng and WANG Shuhua.Shadow authors and shadow reviewers hiding in academic journals[J].Acta Editologica,2017,29(1):20-22.
Authors:XIAO Jun  CHENG Peng and WANG Shuhua
Institution:Editorial Office of Journal of Earth Science, China University of Geosciences,430074, Wuhan, China,Editorial Office of Journal of Earth Science, China University of Geosciences,430074, Wuhan, China and Editorial Office of Journal of Earth Science, China University of Geosciences,430074, Wuhan, China
Abstract:Shadow authors and shadow reviewers are a reflection of lack of scientific integrity,which would disrupt the normal journal publishing process,and lead to academic misconduct.Solutions like strengthening information review,rationally using ORCID and ResearchGate platforms,and establishing an expert database are proposed after the risk analysis of shadow authors and shadow reviewers.The proposed measures are beneficial to research integrity maintenance,conducive to the reconstruction of the healthy and orderly scientific research atmosphere.
Keywords:scientific integrity  inappropriate authorship  false peer review  academic misconduct
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号