| 国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘晶晶.国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式研究[J].编辑学报,2017,29(2):200-203. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘晶晶 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院文献情报中心,100190,北京 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过网络调研和文献梳理的方式,结合具体案例,如Elsevier、Nature、PLoS、F1000 Research等,对国外开放获取期刊的同行评议方式进行研究.认为结构化同行评议、发表后开放式同行评议以及第三方独立同行评议,各有利弊,应该取长补短,优化评议方式,更好地发挥科技期刊作为学术质量把关者和过滤器的作用.
|
| 关 键 词： | 开放获取期刊 同行评议 学术质量 |
| 收稿时间： | 2016/8/26 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2016/8/26 0:00:00 |
Study of peer review modes of abroad open access journals |
| |
| LIU Jingjing.Study of peer review modes of abroad open access journals[J].Acta Editologica,2017,29(2):200-203. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Jingjing |
| |
| Institution: | National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,100190,Beijing,China |
| |
| Abstract: | In this paper,through network survey and literature review,combined with specific cases such as Elsevier,Nature,PLoS and F1000 Research,we research the peer review modes of abroad open access journals.It is considered that the structured peer-review,open peer review after publishing,and the third party independent peer review,each has advantages and disadvantages,and should complement with each other,and optimize the appraisal modes,so as to play a better role as controller and filter for the quality of academic sci-tech journals. |
| |
| Keywords: | open access journal peer review academic quality |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
