| 正确处理审稿中的几个辩证统一关系 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 夏青,黄河胜.正确处理审稿中的几个辩证统一关系[J].编辑学报,2001,13(2):75-76. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 夏青 黄河胜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国药理学通报编辑部, |
| |
| 摘 要： | 审者与作者之间的矛盾始终存在于审稿过程之中，正确处理这对矛盾必须采用辩证方法，应具体处理以下几种辩证关系，审高的严肃性和灵活性的统一关系，集体定稿与个人审稿的统一关系，作者与审者的统一关系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 质量控制 审稿 科技期刊 期刊编辑 严肃性 集体定稿 个人审搞 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000年11月30日 |
Cultivating dialectical thought to improve quality of peer review |
| |
| Xia Qing,Huang Hesheng.Cultivating dialectical thought to improve quality of peer review[J].Acta Editologica,2001,13(2):75-76. |
| |
| Authors: | Xia Qing Huang Hesheng |
| |
| Institution: | Xia Qing,Huang Hesheng author's address Editorial Department of Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin,230032,Hefei,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The contradiction between the reviewer and the author exists in the course of the examination from beginning to end. In order to improve the quality of peer review,we must adopt the dialectical methods to deal with the contradiction. There are several dialectical unities during the examination such as the unity between seriousness and flexibility,the unity between individual review and collective decision, the unity between author and reviewer and so on. |
| |
| Keywords: | periodicals quality control peer reviewFirst |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
