| 论科技期刊编辑话语权 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴学军,余毅,王亚秋.论科技期刊编辑话语权[J].编辑学报,2012,24(4):321-322. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴学军 余毅 王亚秋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 《上海电机学院学报》编辑部,上海,200240;《四川师范大学学报自然科学版》编辑部,成都,610066;哈尔滨工程大学期刊社,哈尔滨,150001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 科技期刊编辑的话语权是期刊话语权的重要组成部分。科技期刊编辑在工作中存在话语权过度和不足的现象。例如审稿环节,从3方面剖析编辑话语权失度对期刊的不利影响。认为编辑必须拥有适度的话语权,在网络平台背景下,应改变编辑传统单一的话语权模式,融入多元素,多视角地构建编辑科学的话语权平台。
|
| 关 键 词： | 编辑话语权 科技期刊 失度 适度 专家审稿 |
| 收稿时间： | 2012/3/25 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2012/3/25 0:00:00 |
Discussion of the right to speak of sci-tech periodical editors |
| |
| WU Xuejun,YU Yi and WANG Yaqiu.Discussion of the right to speak of sci-tech periodical editors[J].Acta Editologica,2012,24(4):321-322. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Xuejun YU Yi and WANG Yaqiu |
| |
| Institution: | Newsroom of Journal of Shanghai Dianji University,200240,Shanghai,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The right to speak of journal editors plays an important part in journal publishing. There exist phenomena of excessive and inadequate rights to speak by editors in journal editing. Taking peer review as an example, this paper analyzes the adverse effect of editors'' misuse of their right to speak from three aspects. It is proposed that editors must have moderate discourse right. In the background of the journal network platform, it is suggested that the editors'' traditional single right to speak should be changed, and be integrated into a scientific, multi-element and multi-angle platform of right to speak. |
| |
| Keywords: | right to speak of editor sci-tech periodical misuse moderation peer review |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
