| 医学论文质量评价的若干问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 董燕萍,雷水英,王攀智,钱寿初.医学论文质量评价的若干问题[J].编辑学报,2009,21(3):212-214. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 董燕萍 雷水英 王攀智 钱寿初 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 国际肝胆胰疾病杂志,英文版,编辑部,310003,杭州;中华医学杂志(英文版)编辑部,100710,北京 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 医学论文质量评价、信息交换的传统模式正在发生变化.审稿方法有明显缺陷而改革乏力.引文分析和影响因子的使用存在争议,且偏离了正确的使用轨道.开放存取出版模式与传统审稿方法相结合或许能成为医学论文评价的一种途径,做到真正意义上的"公开,公平,公正".
|
| 关 键 词： | 医学论文 质量评价 引文分析 影响因子 公开存取 |
| 收稿时间： | 2008/12/5 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2008/12/5 0:00:00 |
Several problems in assessing quality of biomedical papers |
| |
| DONG Yanping,LEI Shuiying,WANG Panzhi and QIAN Shouchu.Several problems in assessing quality of biomedical papers[J].Acta Editologica,2009,21(3):212-214. |
| |
| Authors: | DONG Yanping LEI Shuiying WANG Panzhi and QIAN Shouchu |
| |
| Institution: | DONG Yanping,LEI Shuiying,WANG Panzhi,QIAN ShouchuFirst-author's address Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,The First Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine,310003,Hangzhou,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The conventional models of quality assessment of biomedical papers and information exchange have greatly changed in the last few years.Peer review system has its weakness in medical journal publishing but has not changed much worldwide.The use of citation analysis and impact factor in assessment of research papers is out the correct track.Open access in combination with traditional peer review system seems to be feasible in evaluating biomedical research papers,and in some sense it is "open,fair and justice... |
| |
| Keywords: | medical paper quality assessment citation analysis impact factor open access |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
