| 期刊信赖度及其评价思路 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 万东升.期刊信赖度及其评价思路[J].编辑学报,2015,27(3):218-221. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 万东升 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国林学会《林业科学》编辑部,100091,北京 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 全国高等学校文科学报研究会编辑学研究重点课题 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 简要介绍开放获取(0A)的缘起与发展历程,论证OA对增强学术自由、降低出版成本、促进文献传播和提高引用率、推进传统出版模式发展演变方面的积极意义,阐述其发展过程中可能引起的期刊数量泛滥、科研成本提高、质量不稳和不当获利等问题.基于中国期刊业的现状和OA在中国的发展进程,围绕利益辩证关系和平衡机制,提出中国期刊业应采取的国家战略和行业对策.
|
| 关 键 词： | 期刊 开放获取 思考 对策 |
| 收稿时间： | 2011/3/22 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2011/3/22 0:00:00 |
Reliability of a journal and its evaluation methods |
| |
| WAN Dongsheng.Reliability of a journal and its evaluation methods[J].Acta Editologica,2015,27(3):218-221. |
| |
| Authors: | WAN Dongsheng |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial Department of the Journal/Institute of Academic Transmission and Evaluation, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, 643000, Zigong, Sichuan, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The reliability of a journal can be evaluated from the macro and micro levels. On the macro level, it is reflected in subjective feelings of involved main bodies and their evaluation on the reliability. On the micro level, reliability should be evaluated carefully through questionnaire, investigation, literature evaluation method, and related tools. It is suggested that scientific and social science researchers should enhance their research of journal reliability from the perspective of improving the quality and attitude of service, and expand the depth and width of relevant theories. Moreover, they should deepen the learning, innovation and exploration on journal reliability evaluation indexes to play a better function in standardization of relevant redactology, periodical evaluation and academic evaluation. |
| |
| Keywords: | journal OA reflection countermeasures |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
