| 科技名词规范化表达的要求及意义 ——以工程爆破论文为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吕海亮,傅游.科技名词规范化表达的要求及意义 ——以工程爆破论文为例[J].编辑学报,2020,32(5):513-517. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吕海亮 傅游 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东科技大学期刊社,266590,山东青岛 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 科技名词规范化是学术交流和科技发展的有效支撑。阐述了科技名词规范化的意义及术语表达不规范的危害,以工程爆破类论文为例,分析了期刊论文中科技名词使用不规范的几类典型问题,涉及同(近)音字术语混用、概念混淆引起的术语误用、沿用曾称(俗称)和表述不统一等。指出问题原因,结合科技名词的使用要求,探讨了相应的处理策略。提出促进术语规范化工作的建议,建议期刊同人在论文编辑加工中注意和倡导科技名词的规范使用,同时呼吁广大科技工作者关注和重视科技名词的规范化。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技名词 工程爆破 科技论文 规范 编辑加工 |
Requirement on standard expression of scientific terms:case study on engineering blasting papers |
| |
| LYU Hailiang,FU You.Requirement on standard expression of scientific terms:case study on engineering blasting papers[J].Acta Editologica,2020,32(5):513-517. |
| |
| Authors: | LYU Hailiang FU You |
| |
| Institution: | Periodical Office of Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology, 266590, Qingdao, Shandong, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The normalization of scientific terms is the effective support for academic exchange and technological development. We analyzed the significance of scientific normalization and the main harm brought by nonstandard terms, and discussed several nonstandard presentation of technical terms in journal articles based on case study in engineering blasting papers, which involved the utilization of technical terms such as homophone or similar sounding terms, confusing concept of terms, use old name of terms and inconsistency expression of technical terms. Combining the requirement of terminologies normalization,we analyzed the discrepant and not standardized causes, and presented the processing strategies. To improve the standardization level of scientific journals, we think editors and all of scientists and engineers should pay attention to the normalization of utilization of technical terms according to relevant state standards during editorial or other research work. |
| |
| Keywords: | technical terms engineering blasting scientific paper standardization editing |
|
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
