首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

学术期刊审稿专家学术不端行为认知情况调查
引用本文:陈钢,徐锦杭,丛黎明.学术期刊审稿专家学术不端行为认知情况调查[J].编辑学报,2015,27(3):246-248.
作者姓名:陈钢  徐锦杭  丛黎明
作者单位:《浙江预防医学》编辑部,310004;《健康博览》杂志社,310051,杭州
摘    要:对《浙江预防医学》杂志91位审稿专家现场问卷调查的结果显示:审稿专家对作者学术不端行为和审稿入学术不端行为的认知率较高,但还不够全面,对作者“不当署名”行为、审稿人“故意拖延审稿”“提交不客观的审稿意见”行为的认知率较低.根据调查结果,认为学术期刊编辑部应采取多种形式为审稿专家提供培训,以提高审稿专家对学术不端行为认知的水平和发现能力.

关 键 词:学术期刊  审稿专家  学术不端行为  认知水平
收稿时间:2014/9/10 0:00:00
修稿时间:2014/9/10 0:00:00

Survey of peer reviewers' cognition on academic misconduct
CHEN Gang,XU Jinhang and CONG Liming.Survey of peer reviewers'' cognition on academic misconduct[J].Acta Editologica,2015,27(3):246-248.
Authors:CHEN Gang  XU Jinhang and CONG Liming
Institution:Zhejiang Journal of Preventive Medicine, 310004, Hangzhou, China
Abstract:The results of a questionnaire survey of 75 peer reviewers from Zhejiang Journal of Preventive Medicine show that peer reviewers have relatively high but insufficient cognition on academic misconduct of their own and authors''. The rates of cognition on the behaviors including authors'' improper signatures, reviewers'' deliberate delays and unobjective opinions are quite low. Consequently, in order to improve the rate of cognition on academic misconduct and reviewing ability, editorial departments should offer multiple forms of training for the reviewers.
Keywords:academic journal  peer reviewer  academic misconduct  cognition
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号