首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

决审:决定科技期刊学术水平的主要环节
引用本文:孙二虎,何洪英,刘东渝,舒服,葛亮.决审:决定科技期刊学术水平的主要环节[J].编辑学报,2003,15(6):406-408.
作者姓名:孙二虎  何洪英  刘东渝  舒服  葛亮
作者单位:应用与环境生物学报编辑部,610041,成都
摘    要:对于某一特定期刊,只有主编或副主编等的决审才可能全面衡量来稿,做出适合自己期刊的最恰当的选择,这是决定期刊质量的最根本的环节。编辑界对“完美”外审专家的期待不切实际,外审专家有权选用自己喜爱的方式表达意见,编辑界应该提供更为宽松的环境。依《应用与环境生物学报》的审稿档案资料,将外审意见的表达方式划分为5个类型。提出了决审者的基本条件。

关 键 词:科技期刊  学术水平  稿件审读  专家审稿
修稿时间:2002年10月29日

Final review: a primary step in deciding the academic quality of scientific journals
Sun Erhu,He Hongying,Liu Dongyu,Shu Fu,Ge Liang The Editorial.Final review: a primary step in deciding the academic quality of scientific journals[J].Acta Editologica,2003,15(6):406-408.
Authors:Sun Erhu  He Hongying  Liu Dongyu  Shu Fu  Ge Liang The Editorial
Institution:Sun Erhu,He Hongying,Liu Dongyu,Shu Fu,Ge Liang The Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology,Chengdu Institute of Biology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,610041,Chengdu,China
Abstract:For a specific journal, only by the final review carried out by the chief editor or associate chief editors can the contributions be evaluated all sidedly and can the most suitable decision be made. So the final review is the primary step in deciding the academic level of the journal. Based on the authors' analyses, the editors should not expect the "perfect" peer reviewers. Peer reviewers can express their opinions in their favourite ways, and editors must provide a sound environment. According to the peer review records of Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology , the expression ways of peer reviewers are divided into five types. Lastly, the basic requirements for the final reviewers are suggested.
Keywords:scientific journal  final review  factors influencing acceptance or rejection of contributions  style of peer review
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号