| 对专家审稿的分析和思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵丽莹,杨波,张荣丽,王小唯.对专家审稿的分析和思考[J].编辑学报,2010,22(2):146-148. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵丽莹 杨波 张荣丽 王小唯 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 《哈尔滨工业大学学报》编辑部,150001,哈尔滨;《哈尔滨工业大学学报》编辑部,150001,哈尔滨;《哈尔滨工业大学学报》编辑部,150001,哈尔滨;《哈尔滨工业大学学报》编辑部,150001,哈尔滨 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了研究专家审稿的规律和特征,对2008年度《哈尔滨工业大学学报》96篇论文的195次送审情况进行统计分析。结果表明:副教授的审回率和A类意见率都高于教授;40岁以下专家审回率和A类意见率最高,40～44岁的专家次之,45～54岁的专家审回率和A类意见率低,65岁以上专家审回率不高,但是一旦审稿就会比较认真,而且返回迅速;学术氛围浓厚的著名学府的专家在审稿方面更有责任感和奉献精神;工作繁忙是专家不审稿和审稿不认真的一个主要原因。建议高校学报大胆选用青年审稿专家,不断优化审稿专家数据库,与审稿专家建立良好的合作关系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 高校学报 专家审稿 A类意见 审回率 |
| 收稿时间： | 2009/11/26 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2009/11/26 0:00:00 |
Analysis and reflection of peer review |
| |
| ZHAO Liying,YANG Bo,ZHANG Rongli and WANG Xiaowei.Analysis and reflection of peer review[J].Acta Editologica,2010,22(2):146-148. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Liying YANG Bo ZHANG Rongli and WANG Xiaowei |
| |
| Institution: | Editorial Department of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,150001,Harbin,China,Editorial Department of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,150001,Harbin,China,Editorial Department of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,150001,Harbin,China and Editorial Department of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,150001,Harbin,China |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to study the laws and characteristics of peer review,statistical analysis on 195 submissions for approval or revision of 96 papers on Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology in the year of 2008 was conducted.Results indicate that the return rate of peer review by associate professors is much higher than that by professors,and the ratio of the number of reviewers' opinions belonging to level A to that of all reviewers' opinions by associate professors is also higher than that by professors.The mos... |
| |
| Keywords: | university journal peer review reviewers' opinions belonging to level A return rate of peer view |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
