首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

科技学术出版中的灰色不端行为分析及对策
引用本文:赵丽莹,张宏.科技学术出版中的灰色不端行为分析及对策[J].编辑学报,2012,24(6):529-531.
作者姓名:赵丽莹  张宏
作者单位:《哈尔滨工业大学学报》编辑部,哈尔滨,150001;《哈尔滨工业大学学报》编辑部,哈尔滨,150001
摘    要:为了维护和促进学术诚信,对科技学术出版中的灰色不端行为进行研究。在界定"灰色不端行为"的基础上,分析一篇论文标注多项基金、论文署名不实、腊肠论文、操纵数据等4种灰色不端行为的表现形式、特点及其形成原因和危害,提出供科技期刊编辑参考的防范措施。认为科技期刊需要不断了解变化的和新出现的学术行为规范,判断性地思考和使用这些规范来应对学术不端问题。

关 键 词:科技学术出版  灰色不端行为  编辑对策
收稿时间:2012/3/19 0:00:00
修稿时间:2012/3/19 0:00:00

Grey academic misconduct in sci-tech publications:analysis and countermeasures for editors
ZHAO Liying and ZHANG Hong.Grey academic misconduct in sci-tech publications:analysis and countermeasures for editors[J].Acta Editologica,2012,24(6):529-531.
Authors:ZHAO Liying and ZHANG Hong
Institution:Editorial Department of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,150001,Harbin,China
Abstract:In order to maintain and promote academic integrity, we conducted research on grey academic misconduct in sci-tech publications. Based on the definition of grey academic misconduct, we analyze the forms, characteristics, nature, causes and harms of four types of misconduct:too many funds supporting one paper, inauthentic authorship, dividing a single paper into several ones, and fabricated data. Measures for the editors to prevent these behaviors are proposed. It is suggested that editors need to keep informed of the existing and changing forms of academic misconduct and standards of new academic behavior, and use critical mind and these standards to cope with academic misconduct.
Keywords:academic publication  grey academic misconduct  for editors
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号