首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

应正确著录学位论文等3类参考文献——匡正《参考文献著录规则发展的历史脉络及新国标研究》中的谬误
引用本文:杨兰芝,刘永芳.应正确著录学位论文等3类参考文献——匡正《参考文献著录规则发展的历史脉络及新国标研究》中的谬误[J].编辑学报,2017,29(6):554-556.
作者姓名:杨兰芝  刘永芳
作者单位:鲁东大学图书馆 264025,山东烟台;鲁东大学外国语学院 264025,山东烟台
摘    要:为了避免对GB/T 7714-2015《信息与文献参考文献著录规则》的使用者产生误导,辨析《出版发行研究》2015年第11期刊登的《参考文献著录规则发展的历史脉络及新国标研究》一文中存在的对新标准的条款理解错误、所列举的示例明显与新标准不一致,以及部分参考文献的著录不正确等问题,并以新标准及相关文献为依据,对谬误做了匡正.

关 键 词:参考文献著录  问题辨析  谬误匡正

Correctly documenting three types of bibliographic references including dissertation:rectifying the errors in Historical Context of Recording Rules Development in Bibliographic References and Research on New National Standard published in Publishing Research(the 11th Issue of 2015)//
YANG Lanzhi and LIU Yongfang.Correctly documenting three types of bibliographic references including dissertation:rectifying the errors in Historical Context of Recording Rules Development in Bibliographic References and Research on New National Standard published in Publishing Research(the 11th Issue of 2015)//[J].Acta Editologica,2017,29(6):554-556.
Authors:YANG Lanzhi and LIU Yongfang
Abstract:To avoid misunderstanding and misuse of Information and Documentation-Rules for Bibliographic References and Citations to Information Resources (GB/T 7714-2015),this paper focuses on Historical Context of Recording Rules Development in Bibliographic References and Research on New National Standard oublished in Publishing Research (the 11 th Issue of 2015) and points out inaccurate explanations of some new rules,nonconformance of given examples to the new rules,and some mistakes of cataloguing references.These errors are rectified according to the new rules and related literatures.
Keywords:bibliographic reference  error analysis  error rectification
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号