| 科技期刊总被引频次和影响因子构成中的自引率比较——兼谈影响因子的人为操纵倾向 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘雪立,魏雅慧,盛丽娜,方红玲,王燕,付中静,郑成铭,董建军.科技期刊总被引频次和影响因子构成中的自引率比较——兼谈影响因子的人为操纵倾向[J].编辑学报,2017,29(6):602-606. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘雪立 魏雅慧 盛丽娜 方红玲 王燕 付中静 郑成铭 董建军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 新乡医学院期刊社,河南省科技期刊研究中心 453003,河南新乡;新乡医学院期刊社,河南省科技期刊研究中心 453003,河南新乡;新乡医学院管理学院 453003,河南新乡 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以2015年自然科学版JCR(S04CR)收录的8 778种期刊为研究对象,计算各期刊总被引频次构成中的自引率(self-citation rate for total citations,RSC,TC)和影响因子构成中的自引率(self-citation rate for impact factor,RSC,IF),全方位比较二者差异程度,揭示不同国家和地区人为操纵期刊影响因子的倾向.结果显示:8 778种期刊集合RSC,TC为0.072,集合RSC,IF为0.112,RSC,TC平均值为0.093,RSC,IF平均值为0.132.排除17种无RSC,IF者,8 761种期刊中,RSC,IF＞RSC,TC者6 954种(79.2％),RSC,TC＞ RSC,IF者1 599种(18.2％),RSC,IF=RSC,TC者208种.Wilcoxon秩检验结果是,Z=59.836,P＜0.001,2组差异有统计学意义.SCI来源期刊中RSC,IF显著高于RSC,TC,捷克、印度、日本、匈牙利和加拿大等国家期刊尤为突出.RSC,IF过度高于RSC,TC,怀疑有人为操纵的可能.
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技期刊 总被引频次 影响因子 自引率 人为操纵 |
Comparisons of the self-citation rates for total citations and impact factors of journals:manipulation of journal impact factor// |
| |
| LIU Xueli,WEI Yahui,SHENG Lin,FANG Hongling,WANG Yan,FU Zhongjing,ZHENG Chengming and DONG Jianjun.Comparisons of the self-citation rates for total citations and impact factors of journals:manipulation of journal impact factor//[J].Acta Editologica,2017,29(6):602-606. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Xueli WEI Yahui SHENG Lin FANG Hongling WANG Yan FU Zhongjing ZHENG Chengming and DONG Jianjun |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper explore the differences between the selfcitation rate for total citations (RSC,TC) and self-citation rate for impact factors (RSC,IF) in the SCI-sourced journals,and reveals the manipulation of journals impact factor in different countries and regions.The study objects include 8 778 journals indexed in the JCR (SCI-JCR) in 2015,the RSC,TC and RSC,IF were calculated,and the differences between the RSC,TC and RSC,IF were compared.In the 8 778 joumals,the aggregative RSC,TC and aggregative RSC,IF are 0.072 and 0.112,respectively,the average RSC,TC and average RSC,IF were 0.093 0.132,respectively.In the 8 761 journals (except 17 journals without RSC,IF),6 954 (79.2％) journals have an RSC,IF ＞ RSC,TC,and 1 599 (18.2％) journals have an RSC,TC ＞ RSC,IF,208 journals have an RSC,IF =RSC,TC.Wilcoxon rank test indicated that Z =59.836,P ＜ 0.001,showing the difference between the two groups is statistically significant.RSC,iF in SCIsourced journals is significantly higher than that of RSC,TC,especially in the journals of Czech Republic,India,Japan,Hungary,and Canada.RSC,IF is obviously higher than RSC,TC,which is suspected to be manipulated. |
| |
| Keywords: | science journal total citation journal impact factor self citation rate manipulation |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
