| 专家定稿会是提高期刊学术水平的关键举措 ——以《中华围产医学杂志》为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高雪莲,刘菲.专家定稿会是提高期刊学术水平的关键举措 ——以《中华围产医学杂志》为例[J].编辑学报,2013,25(5):486-487. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高雪莲 刘菲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学第一医院《中华围产医学杂志》编辑部 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为弥补编辑初审、专家外审、主编定稿的常规审稿模式可能产生的局限性,《中华围产医学杂志》利用每月召开的专家定稿会,对终审的每篇文章从创新性、科学性、实用性等方面,广泛听取专家意见,客观公正地评价稿件,决定稿件的去留。专家定稿会既提高了期刊学术质量,也提高了编辑专业素养。
|
| 关 键 词： | 医学期刊 审稿 定稿会 |
| 收稿时间： | 2012/7/18 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2012/7/18 0:00:00 |
Peer-reviewers' meeting is an important measure to improve the quality of a technical journal |
| |
| GAO Xuelian and LIU Fei.Peer-reviewers'' meeting is an important measure to improve the quality of a technical journal[J].Acta Editologica,2013,25(5):486-487. |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Xuelian and LIU Fei |
| |
| Institution: | GAO Xuelian;LIU Fei;Editorial Office for Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine,Peking University First Hospital; |
| |
| Abstract: | To avoid limitations of routine peer review process, including reviewing of submitted articles by editors, specialists and chief editor, the editorial office of Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine had been organizing a monthly peer reviewers'' meeting since its first issue. This peer-reviewers'' meetings provide objective opinion on the final decision of each paper through group discussion from several aspects, such as innovativeness, scientificity and practical applicability. Finally, the academic quality of the journal has been greatly improved. Moreover, editors of the journal could obtain precious information from the peer-reviewers meetings and also be improved a lot. |
| |
| Keywords: | peer-reviewers'' meeting technical journal academic quality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
