| 中国学术数字信息资源市场中的买断博弈 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘向,马费成.中国学术数字信息资源市场中的买断博弈[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(4):56-111. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘向 马费成 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 武汉大学信息资源研究中心
2. |
| |
| 基金项目： | 基于生命周期理论的数字信息资源深度开发与管理机制研究 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对中国学术数字信息资源市场中数据库服务商的垄断行为进行博弈分析，并对市场监管部门及不同规模服务商提出发展建议。通过模型分析发现：由于不同信息资源需求的不均匀性，买断少量高需求资源可以提升企业效益，不过垄断进行到一定程度就会停止，且先行动者获益更明显；规模小的服务商有更大动力买断数字信息资源，规模大的服务商的报复行动对规模小的服务商的效益影响不大，所以规模小的服务商具有很大的意愿买断信息资源；允许各服务商保有一定量独占资源，鼓励深度挖掘及提供个性化服务是形成市场良性竞争的有效途径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 网络信息资源 学术信息资源 期刊数据库 学术数据库 垄断博弈 |
| 收稿时间： | 2011-09-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2011-11-07 |
Monopoly Game Model for Chinese Market of Academic Digital Information Resource |
| |
| Liu Xiang Ma Feicheng.Monopoly Game Model for Chinese Market of Academic Digital Information Resource[J].Library and Information Service,2012,56(4):56-111. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Xiang Ma Feicheng |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Center for Studies of Information Resources of Wuhan University,;
2. ;
3. Center for Studies of Information Resources of Wuhan University, |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper makes a game analysis on the monopoly action of academic digital resource database service provider,making development suggestion for service providers in different scale and market monitor department.It makes the conclusion that due to the inequality demand of information resources,buying out several resources in high demand can improve the company profit,but monopoly will stop at certain process,and the first mover will gain a distinct advantage.Small scale service providers are more likely to buy out digital information resource,because the revenge of big scale service providers has little effect on small scale firm.Promising different service providers monopolize certain resources,encouraging deep mining and providing personalize service are effective ways to lead to a benign competition. |
| |
| Keywords: | Internet information resource academic information resource journal database academic database monopoly game |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
