| 情报学前沿领域的调查与分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赖茂生,王琳,李宇宁.情报学前沿领域的调查与分析[J].图书情报工作,2008,52(3):6-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赖茂生 王琳 李宇宁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京北京大学信息管理系 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 简述课题的研究背景，描述三轮专家问卷调查的情况，对所获得的数据进行统计分析，应用的指标主要有：等级、专家意见集中度、专家意见协调度、专家积极性系数等。对初步筛选出来的23个研究领域进行分析和比较，发现其中21个领域的变异系数都较低，表明专家的协调程度较高；各领域得分满分率普遍偏低，表明我国情报学界对这些领域的前沿性肯定度不太高。
|
| 关 键 词： | 情报学研究 学科前沿 问卷调查 德尔菲法 |
| 收稿时间： | 2007-12-17 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年12月17 |
Survey and Analysis of the Frontiers in Information Science |
| |
| Lai Maosheng,Wang Lin,Li Yuning.Survey and Analysis of the Frontiers in Information Science[J].Library and Information Service,2008,52(3):6-6. |
| |
| Authors: | Lai Maosheng Wang Lin Li Yuning |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper briefly introduces the academic background of research project.It describes the results of three rounds of questionnaires survey and does statistical analyses of the data set obtained from the survery.The main indexes are rank,concentration degree and the coordination degree of expert options, experts positive coefficient.It analyses and compares 23 potential frontiers in information science,finds that the variation coefficient of 21 frontiers are low,indicating that the coordination degree of experts in these areas are high.It also finds that the full mark rate of each frontiers is low,indicating that information scientists in China do not hold high certainty to these areas. |
| |
| Keywords: | information science research frontiers Delphi method |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《图书情报工作》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
