首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中外图书情报学研究方法量化比较
引用本文:张力,唐健辉,刘永涛,韩松涛,潘有能,陈丽君,叶鹰.中外图书情报学研究方法量化比较[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(2):21-27.
作者姓名:张力  唐健辉  刘永涛  韩松涛  潘有能  陈丽君  叶鹰
作者单位:浙江大学公共管理学院,310027
基金项目:本文系教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“哲学社会科学方法创新研究”子项目“哲学社会科学方法创新计量研究”成果之一。
摘    要:以图书情报学的10种外文重要期刊和3种中文重要期刊所刊载的论文为样本集,用等距抽样方法每年抽取2期为频次,规律性读取2001—2010十年间论文并归纳论文采用的方法信息,用信息计量法分析中外差异。结果表明国内研究以定性为主,尤其非实证研究的论文比率高出国外近20倍;国外的资料收集方法更具多样性,多用定量的、归纳的、实证的研究方法。借鉴国外的研究方法,有助于提升国内图书情报学的学术水平,使其融入国际学术范式。

关 键 词:图书情报学  研究方法  定量研究  计量分析

An Informetric Comparison on LIS Methodology between Chinese and Foreign Articles
Zhang Li,Tang Jianhui,Liu Yongtao,Han Songtao,Pan Youneng,Chen Lijun and Ye Ying.An Informetric Comparison on LIS Methodology between Chinese and Foreign Articles[J].Journal of Library Science In China,2012,38(2):21-27.
Authors:Zhang Li  Tang Jianhui  Liu Yongtao  Han Songtao  Pan Youneng  Chen Lijun and Ye Ying
Institution:Zhang Li,Tang Jianhui,Liu Yongtao,Han Songtao,Pan Youneng,Chen Lijun & Ye Ying
Abstract:A sample of articles from 10 foreign and 3 Chinese core journals in library and information science during 2001-2010 was selected through systematic sampling method. The articles were analyzed and compared in terms of research methodologies using informetric method. The results showed that qualitative methods were overwhelmingly dominant in Chinese articles while quantitative methods were much more used in foreign articles. Some suggestions were proposed for the development of library and information science research in China. 2 figs. 3 tabs. 10 refs.
Keywords:Library and information science  Research methodology  Quantitative study  Bibliometric analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国图书馆学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国图书馆学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号