共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 328 毫秒
1.
冯美娜 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》2015,(2):16-20
研究对比分析了中国英语学习者在不同分组情况下同伴反馈活动的过程和效果。数据来自于某三本院校英语专业一年级四个平行班中120名学生的写作文本及随访记录。调查发现同伴反馈对各个小组学生的写作能力总体上都产生积极影响,但小组内部成员的语言水平及结对方式影响同伴反馈的效果。综合考虑反馈质量、有效采纳数量及写作文本提高分数等因素,高低配对组是同伴反馈的最大受益者,依次是高高组、低低组,而低高组的反馈效果最不理想。 相似文献
2.
本研究旨在探讨二语学生对电子同伴反馈和传统面对面同伴反馈的看法。该研究通过贵州大学英语专业两个班级的写作课,让受试学生使用两种同伴反馈方式,即电子同伴反馈与传统同伴反馈。在研究中,我们首先对受试学生分别进行传统同伴反馈和电子同伴反馈的培训,然后对受试学生在两种同伴反馈中所体现的反馈类型进行对比分析,最后对受试学生进行问卷调查,了解他们对两种反馈方式的态度和想法。结果发现,大部分受试学生更喜欢使用电子同伴反馈方式。电子同伴反馈方式是对传统的面对面同伴反馈方式有益的补充,对学生的二语写作可以起到更积极的促进作用。 相似文献
3.
严文庆 《外语教学理论与实践》2023,181(1):70
本文研究如何利用课堂展示活动中的同伴反馈促进非英语专业研究生的有效学习。课堂观察和问卷调查分析发现,以“提问”作为同伴反馈任务,有利于促进学生听众对展示内容的关注;以“描述性反馈”作为同伴反馈任务,有利于促进听众对展示策略与技巧的关注;而以“找错”作为同伴反馈任务,则有利于促进听众对语言现象的关注。经过培训与引导,研究生能够在实践中明确同伴反馈对内容、策略与语言等不同焦点的关注,逐步提高同伴反馈的质量,有效地促进课堂学习。 相似文献
4.
后疫情时代,提质增效是在线开放课程内涵式发展的重要抓手。重申促进学习的评价,强调学习者的深度参与,探究学习者参与同伴互评的特点及现存问题具有重要的现实意义。文章基于国内一门在线开放课程,采用学习分析技术从结构化与非结构化数据入手,分析在线开放课程同伴互评过程中学习者的投入度,并进一步探究同伴互评投入度与学习绩效的关系。研究结果表明,在线开放课程中学习者同伴互评的行为投入及认知投入不高,但是参与同伴互评能够识别更有动力通过课程的学习者,且其认知投入度能够预测其学习绩效。基于FBM(学习行为模型)模型提出促进同伴互评投入度的两阶段干预策略,从而提高学习者参与同伴互评的投入度,并为教师及平台提供更具针对性的策略建议。 相似文献
5.
6.
王晓丽 《北京城市学院学报》2015,(3)
由于国内关于同伴互评对学生英语写作影响的研究相对匮乏,则本文通过量化分析方法和访谈对英语专业三年级学生的210份书面反馈进行探讨性研究,考察了反馈类型、纠错种类以及学生对同伴互评所持的态度。结果表明,同伴互评书面反馈类型呈现多样化,但绝大多数学生书面反馈属于纠正型。纠错种类主要是针对语法形式进行的纠正和修改,同时还兼顾文章的思想内容、统一性、连贯性等其他方面。学生书面评语及访谈表明学生对同伴互评的态度是肯定的,且本研究对写作教学中的同伴互评有一定启示。 相似文献
7.
徐颖 《四川教育学院学报》2010,26(10):70-73
英语专业四年级学生在TEM-8写作中存在的一些问题可以通过同伴反馈得到有效的解决。实践研究表明同伴反馈能够帮助写作者澄清观点,理清逻辑,充分发挥学生学习的主体作用,提高写作能力和写作质量。 相似文献
8.
为了挖掘促进大学生产生更深层同伴对话反馈的可视化实时互动界面设计特点,设计了三种不同可视化实时互动界面支持的同伴对话反馈活动,并通过认知网络分析探究不同互动界面对大学生同伴对话反馈表现的影响。研究发现：（1）适度增加可视化互动能更好地促进学生深层反馈行为的产生,以及达到更深的认知投入层次;（2）社交便签式的互动界面适用于激发更多初始提问,逻辑图式的互动界面可能会削减初始提问的发生;（3）逻辑图式的互动界面比社交便签式的互动界面更适用于促进初步反馈和深层反馈,以及缩小深度学习者和非深度学习者的对话反馈表现差距;（4）连接词的增加使用能激发更多的追问,但未能有利于激发更多的深层回应,且反而可能拉大深度学习者和非深度学习者的表现差距。基于以上发现,提出了相关建议,以支持高校教师更好地基于可视化实时互动工具,设计混合教学情境下促进大学生深度学习的同伴对话反馈活动。 相似文献
9.
<正>数学讲评课是数学教学过程中必要且重要的环节,它是针对数学检测后学生的反馈情况,通过讲解和评价的方式再向学生反馈的一种课型.如果说检测的目的之一是教师要掌握学生在某一阶段的学习情况,那么讲评的目的就是让学生清楚地知道自己在此阶段的数学学习中存在的问题及问题产生的原因.一、前期反馈,撰写小结教师在批阅试卷的基础上做好统计工作,依据试卷 相似文献
10.
刘茵 《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》2008,24(6)
以双语课程<市场营销学>为例,对英语专业学生和英语国家留学生就双语课程引导性讲义的可行性问题进行访谈和同卷调查,发现在多媒体教学条件下,双语课程课前引导性讲义可使大部分学生的预习更具有针对性和方向性,有助于提升课堂笔记的完整性和深度,提高课堂学习效率.但同时也可能间接强化少数学生的依赖心理甚至间接引发个别学生的适课,但总体而言,其产生的积极意义大于消极影响. 相似文献
11.
This study examines the impact of an assessment training module on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Seventy-eight undergraduate students participated in the study. The participants completed an assessment training exercise, prior to engaging in peer-assessment activities. During the training, students reviewed learning concepts, discussed marking criteria, graded example projects and compared their evaluations with the instructor’s evaluation. Data were collected in the form of initial and final versions of students’ projects, students’ scoring of example projects before and after the assessment training, and written feedback that students provided on peer projects. Results of data analysis indicate that the assessment training led to a significant decrease in the discrepancy between student ratings and instructor rating of example projects. In addition, the degree of student vs. instructor discrepancy was highly predictive of the quality of feedback that students provided to their peers and the effectiveness of revisions that they made to their own projects upon receiving peer feedback. Smaller discrepancies in ratings were associated with provision of higher quality peer feedback during peer assessment, as well as better revision of initial projects after peer assessment. 相似文献
12.
PETER J. MILLER 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2003,28(4):383-394
The value of peer and self-assessments is commonly diminished by scoring range restriction by the raters. This investigation studied the effect of different levels of scoring criteria specificity and written feedback requests on the distribution of scores, the correlation between peer and self-assessments and the quantity and nature of written feedback. Increasing the number of criteria decreased the mean scores and increased the standard deviations of the peer and self-assessments, providing a wider range of scores and increasing the sensitivity of the instrument. Correlation between peer and self-assessment was improved with more specific criteria, depending on the statistic used. However, analysis revealed that the more specific written feedback requests elicited more peer feedback. Educators should consider the effects of criteria specificity and written feedback solicitation on rater behaviour when designing these instruments. 相似文献
13.
Although the effectiveness of peer review has been examined, few have tested the joint benefits of providing and receiving feedback features and quality in L2 contexts. The present study investigated variation in key features and quality of feedback provided and received by high and low L2 proficiency students and its benefits on revision in the authentic setting of students experiencing both roles of providing and receiving peer feedback in English academic writing. Analyses on two drafts from 50 students, 1356 idea units of anonymous implementable peer feedback and back-evaluation ratings revealed that the combined effect of providing and receiving feedback on revision was prominent for all students. But the bilateral benefits of providing and receiving feedback features were more significant for high proficiency students, while providing feedback features and quality benefited low proficiency students more. The study implies that students need more bilateral training with both providing and receiving feedback. 相似文献
14.
The need for supporting student writing has received much attention in writing research. One specific type of support is feedback—including peer feedback—on the writing process. Despite the wealth of literature on both feedback and academic writing, there is little empirical evidence on what type of feedback best promotes writing in online environments. This article reports on research that tries to determine what type of feedback best improves the quality of collaborative writing and what the effects of feedback are on student learning in an environment based on asynchronous written communication. The results reveal that concerning the type of feedback, epistemic feedback or epistemic and suggestive feedback best improve the quality of collaborative writing performance. The nature of the feedback-giver (whether teacher feedback or teacher and peer) makes a difference to the final text only when the feedback is epistemic, or epistemic and suggestive. 相似文献
15.
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of training tutors in content knowledge of a particular domain versus training them in tutoring skills of pedagogical knowledge when tutoring on a complex tutee task. Forty-seven tutor–tutee pairs of fourth-year secondary school students were created and assigned to one of the two treatments. Twenty-two tutors received training in content knowledge and the other twenty-five tutors in tutoring skills. Tutors formulated written feedback immediately after the training. Tutees first interpreted the tutor feedback and then used it to revise their research questions. The results showed that tutors trained in tutoring skills formulated more effective feedback than tutors trained in content knowledge. In addition, tutees helped by tutoring-skills tutors found the feedback more motivating than those helped by content-knowledge tutors. However, no differences were found in tutee performance on revision. The findings are discussed in terms of the set-up of this study and implications for improving the effectiveness of peer tutoring. 相似文献
16.
Ineke van den Berg Wilfried Admiraal Albert Pilot 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2006,31(1):19-36
Peer assessment is understood to be an arrangement with students assessing the quality of their fellow students’ writings and giving feedback to each other. This multiple‐case study of seven designs of peer assessment focuses on the contribution of peer assessment to the acquisition of undergraduates’ writing skills. Its aim is to arrive at an optimal design of peer assessment. Factors included in this study are: the quality of peer assessment activities, the interaction between students in oral peer feedback, students’ learning outcomes, and their evaluation of peer assessment. Most students took assessing the work of their fellow students seriously, and included the peer feedback in the revision of their work. In most conversations, students provided feedback in an evaluative manner. In others, the interaction was more exploratory. For peer assessment, we recommend a combination of written and oral peer feedback. 相似文献
17.
This study investigates the effects of prompting on secondary students’ written peer feedback in chemistry investigation reports. In particular, we examined students’ feedback features in relation to the use of criteria, feedback specificity, and feedback levels. A quasi-experimental pre-test post-test design was adopted. Reviewers in the prompted condition were provided with question prompts that asked them to pose written feedback to their peers on what they did or did not do well and suggestions for improvement, while reviewers in the unprompted condition gave written peer feedback without prompts. The findings showed that prompted peer feedback has a significant effect on the number of comments related to Knowledge of errors, Suggestions for improvement and Process level feedback. This study supports the view that prompting peer feedback in the use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels opens up opportunity for reviewers to engage more meaningfully with peer feedback in report writing tasks. 相似文献
18.
Despite the wide use of peer assessment, questions about the helpfulness of peer feedback are frequently raised. In particular, it is unknown whether, how and to what extent peer feedback can help solve problems in initial texts in complex writing tasks. We investigated this research gap by focusing on the case of writing literature reviews in an academic writing course. The dataset includes two drafts from 21 students, sampled to represent a wide range of document qualities, and 84 anonymous peer reviews, involving 1,289 idea units. Our study revealed that: (1) at both substance and high prose levels, drafts of all quality levels demonstrated more common problems on advanced writing issues (e.g. counter-argument); (2) peer feedback was driven by difficulty of the problem rather than overall draft quality, peer comments were not well aligned with the relative frequency of problems, more comments were given to less difficult problems; (3) peer feedback had a moderate impact on revision, and importantly, receiving multiple comments on the same issue led to more repairs and improvement of draft quality, but consistent with the comments received, authors tended to fix basic problems more often. Implications for practice and research are drawn from these findings. 相似文献
19.
Stan van Ginkel Judith Gulikers Harm Biemans Martin Mulder 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2017,42(6):953-966
Previous research revealed significant differences in the effectiveness of various feedback sources for encouraging students’ oral presentation performance. While former studies emphasised the superiority of teacher feedback, it remains unclear whether the quality of feedback actually differs between commonly used sources in higher education. Therefore, this study examines feedback processes conducted directly after 95 undergraduate students’ presentations in the following conditions: teacher feedback, peer feedback and peer feedback guided by tutor. All processes were videotaped and analysed using a coding scheme that included seven feedback quality criteria deduced from the literature. Results demonstrate that teacher feedback corresponds to the highest extent with the majority of the seven identified feedback quality criteria. For four criteria, peer feedback guided by tutor scores higher than peer feedback. Skills courses should incorporate strategies focused on discussing perceptions of feedback and practising providing feedback to increase the effectiveness of peer feedback. 相似文献
20.
Monika Bader Tony Burner Sarah Hoem Iversen Zoltan Varga 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(7):1017-1028
Despite the crucial role that students play in formative assessment practices, student perspectives on such practices are relatively under-researched. Through a qualitative analysis of 128 reflection notes written by student teachers of English, this article investigates the students’ perceptions of formative feedback as part of portfolio assessment at two teacher education institutions in Norway. As such, it contributes to bridging the gap between research and practice. Students received peer and teacher feedback on assignments and wrote reflection notes during the semester. Findings show that students are positive towards teacher feedback and highlight the significance of teacher praise. Main objections raised against peer feedback concern the lack of constructive criticism. However, positive attitudes towards peer discussion groups suggest that they may be a more effective way of implementing peer assessment than formalised written peer commentary. Student reflections suggest that a failure to understand the task and the feedback is a possible hindrance to successfully revising assignments. Overall, students’ positive attitudes towards the portfolio process, which includes multiple drafting, suggest that students in higher education would benefit from more opportunities to revise and resubmit their work, yet they need adequate practice in providing peer feedback, and interpreting and implementing feedback in general. 相似文献