共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Designing collaborative multiplayer serious games 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Viktor Wendel Michael Gutjahr Stefan Göbel Ralf Steinmetz 《Education and Information Technologies》2013,18(2):287-308
The idea of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) is being investigated for more than twenty years. Since a few years, game-based approaches like video games for learning (Serious Games) offer new fields of application. The combination of game-based learning concepts and collaborative learning may enable new, game-based application areas of CSCL, like collaborative multiplayer Serious Games. Designing such games, however, is very challenging as it requires to take into account traditional single player game design concepts, concepts for multiplayer game design, and concepts for Serious Game design simultaneously. Only very few examples of such games exist today. In this paper we describe an approach for the design of game-based collaborative learning scenarios using multiplayer Serious Games. Our approach aims at combining design concepts from the fields of collaborative learning and (multiplayer) game design. Our approach takes into account the requirements of traditional single player games (fun, narration, immersion, graphics, sound), challenges of multiplayer games (concurrent gaming, interaction) and Serious Game design (seamless inclusion of learning content, adaptation and personalization). Furthermore, requirements of collaborative learning are considered, like group goals, positive interdependence, and individual accountability. Our design concept was used to create a collaborative 3D multiplayer game fostering collaborative behavior as a foundation for game-based collaborative learning in small teams. We performed a user study with eight gaming sessions and a total of 23 participants. Results showed that the game enables a collaborative gameplay and fosters collaborative behavior. This may allow us to use a game-based CSCL approach to combine the advantages of game-based learning with those of collaborative learning in future. 相似文献
2.
柴少明 《现代远程教育研究》2012,(4):35-40
计算机支持的协作学习（CSCL）是近年来教育技术和学习科学研究的热点,协作知识建构是CSCL的主要学习方式和学习目标,如何支持和促进协作知识建构是教育研究者和实践者关注的焦点问题之一。在社会建构主义和对话学习理论基础上建立的基于对话的教学设计和基于研究与实践的协作学习过程模型可以作为一种系统的教学模式,引入到CSCL学习环境中来支持协作知识建构。网络环境下协作学习困难和问题调查,以及CSCL课程实践证明：旨在提高学生对话能力,促进学生不同类型对话产生和发展,培养学生批判性思维能力的促进协作知识建构的教学设计和实施策略是有效的,学生在协作学习中能掌握并运用这些策略来促进协作学习。实现知识建构的目标。 相似文献
3.
Collis Betty Margaryan Anoush 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2004,52(4):38-52
Business needs in many corporations call for learning outcomes that involve problem solutions, and creating and sharing new
knowledge within worksplace situation that may involve collaboration among members of a team. We argue that work-based activities
(WBA) and computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) are appropriate components for courses in such learning situations.
Via this approach, collaborative work situations become the core of a course. We further describe how activity theory can
provide a framework for the design of courses that involve WBA and CSCL as part of a workplace-oriented activity system for
learning. The use of this design approach for courses offered by the Learning and Leadership Development organization of Shell
International Exploration and Production is described and an example is elaborated. Finally, we identify four main issues
and challenges that arose during the use of the design approach. 相似文献
4.
Nadira Saab 《Metacognition and Learning》2012,7(1):1-6
Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is an approach to learning in which learners can actively and collaboratively
construct knowledge by means of interaction and joint problem solving. Regulation of learning is especially important in the
domain of CSCL. Next to the regulation of task performance, the interaction between learners who work in a CSCL environment
needs to be regulated as well. Despite its importance, the regulation of learning in CSCL has received relatively little attention
in research. In the contributions of this special issue different labels are used for various forms of regulation of learning
during CSCL. During collaborative learning, the regulation of activities can take place at different levels of social interaction:
the individual level, the dyadic level, and the group level. Regulative activities of all three levels are presented in the
three studies. All studies have investigated whether the use of regulative activities affected performance, and have found
that regulation at the dyadic and/or group level was positively related to group performance. In sum, these three contributions
provide a constructive overview of the role of regulation of the (collaborative) learning process in CSCL, both in terms of
the impact of regulation on learning processes and learning results as well as the influence of different kinds of support
on the regulation of collaborative learning. 相似文献
5.
6.
Helen Tomlinson William Henderson 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》1995,26(2):131-140
This paper briefly surveys current work in the emerging area of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) and describes how the technology can be extended to exploit communication between computers. A number of applications which might make use of network support, distributed CSCL, are reviewed and a simple prototype distributed CSCL application is described and evaluated. The work has highlighted issues concerning the value, viability and development of distributed CSCL software. It would appear that valuable opportunities for the development of such software exist but it is unclear how these applications might be developed using existing hardware. Conclusions are presented regarding the future of network supported CSCL. 相似文献
7.
When inquiry-based learning is designed for a collaborative context, the interactions that arise in the learning environment can become fairly complex. While the learning effectiveness of such learning environments has been reported in the literature, there have been fewer studies on the students’ learning processes. To address this, the article presents a study of science learning in a computer-supported learning environment called Collaborative Science Inquiry (CSI), which integrates guided inquiry principles for activity design, employs modelling and visualisation tools for promoting conceptual understanding and incorporates key computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) elements for enabling students’ collaboration. With the aim of understanding the process of students’ conceptual changes supported by the CSI learning environment as used in a secondary school, data on students’ test achievements, responses to learning tasks and peer discussions in collaboration were collected, analysed and discussed. The results of the qualitative and quantitative data analysis indicated that guided inquiry coupled with CSCL elements facilitated by the CSI system can engage students in inquiry activities and promote their conceptual understanding in a progressive way. 相似文献
8.
9.
Martin Lea Paul Rogers & Tom Postmes 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2002,33(1):53-63
This paper briefly summarizes the initial development of a computer-supported collaborative learning environment and evaluates its effects in relation to the productivity of CSCL groups. The design of the SIDE-VIEW system is driven by the social identity approach to understanding group behaviour and is premised upon the need to establish congruity between the self-definition of group members and their collaborative learning tasks. We begin by outlining the rationale for the system in relation to productivity and the emergence of team players within collaborative learning groups. We then describe aspects of the design that are intended to enhance both, and report on a field trial of the initial prototype on international groups of higher education students. The preliminary results of the field study indicate that aspects of the design encourage the emergence and influence of team players within groups, with consequential improvements to the quality of the group output. The role of team players in CSCL groups is contrasted with that of group leaders. 相似文献
10.
Shu-Ling Wang Hui-Ting Hong 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2018,66(4):937-953
Research has suggested that self or co-regulated learning is very helpful for the development of students’ autonomy, and is particularly important in online learning environments, because such non-linear environments tend to lack focus and teachers’ monitoring. The social cognitive research suggests that highly self-regulated learners have higher motivation and more control of their learning behaviors, and thus generate better outcomes on an individual basis rather on a group basis. This study thus attempts to extend the social cognitive perspective of self-regulated learning to collective regulated learning, and to investigate the relationships among collective beliefs (i.e., collective task value, a newly developed group motivation), collaborative behaviors (i.e., group cohesion, cognitive quality of collaborative interactions), and collaborative performance through collaborative creation in the CSCL environment. A total of 96 college students participated in this study. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were applied. The results indicate that collective task value is a reliable and valid construct. The results also show that collective task value significantly predicts students’ group cohesion and collaborative performance, although it does not predict students’ cognitive quality of collaborative interactions. Students’ group cohesion and higher level of cognitive quality in collaborative interactions also both significantly predict their collaborative performance through collaborative creation in the CSCL environment. 相似文献
11.
Jun Oshima Ritsuko Oshima Isao Murayama Shigenori Inagaki Makiko Takenaka Hayashi Nakayama 《International Journal of Science Education》2013,35(10):1199-1221
This paper reports design experiments on two Japanese elementary science lesson units in a sixth‐grade classroom supported by computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL) technology as a collaborative reflection tool. We took different approaches in the experiments depending on their instructional goals. In the unit ‘air and how things burn’, we designed the unit where groups of students engaged in building theories on ‘how a candle stops burning in a closed jar’. In the unit ‘characteristics of various solutions’, groups of students collaboratively constructed a pH scale as knowledge artefact. In both studies, the CSCL technology was implemented mainly for facilitating collaboration between groups. Results showed that: (1) students were more likely to engage in symmetric communication (i.e. between groups as well as within groups) in the second unit, and (2) they were also more idea‐centred and more frequently shared their ideas in the second unit. The results were discussed from the perspectives of the scientific practices students engaged in and task structure. 相似文献
12.
Jannet Van Drie Carla Van Boxtel Gijsbert Erkens Gellof Kanselaar 《Technology, Pedagogy and Education》2013,22(1):25-41
Abstract In this article the authors focus on how features of a computersupported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment can elicit and support domain-specific reasoning and more specifically historical reasoning. The CSCL environment enables students to collaborate on a historical inquiry task and in writing an argumentative essay. In order to support historical reasoning the authors compared two representational tools: a graphical representation (argumentative diagram) and a linear representation (argument list). As it is assumed that an argumentative diagram can support both cognitive and interaction processes, it was expected that using this tool would result in more qualitative historical reasoning, in the chat as well as in the essay. However, the results of this study did not show a significant difference in the amount of historical reasoning between the two conditions. A possible explanation can be found in the way the students make use of the representational tool while executing the task. The tool does not only function as a cognitive tool that can elicit elaborate activities, but also as a tool through which students communicate. 相似文献
13.
Manuel Palomo-Duarte Juan Manuel Dodero Inmaculada Medina-Bulo Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada Iván Ruiz-Rube 《Interactive Learning Environments》2013,21(4):444-466
The widespread adoption of computers and Internet in our life has reached the classrooms, where computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) based on wikis offers new ways of collaboration and encourages student participation. When the number of contributions from students increases, traditional assessment procedures of e-learning settings suffer from scalability problems. In a wiki-based learning experience, automatic tools are required to support the assessment of such huge amounts of data. In this work, we present StatMediaWiki, a tool that collects and aggregates information that helps to analyze a MediaWiki installation. It generates charts, tables and different statistics enabling easy analysis of wiki evolution. We have used StatMediaWiki in a Higher Education course and present the results obtained in this case study. 相似文献
14.
15.
Janssen Jeroen Kirschner Paul A. 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2020,68(2):783-805
Educational technology research and development - Research on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) has traditionally investigated how student-, group-, task-, and technological... 相似文献
16.
Addressing a drawback in current research on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), this study investigated the influence of motivation on learning activities and knowledge acquisition during CSCL. Participants’ (N = 200 university students) task was to develop a handout for which they had first an individual preparing phase followed by a computer-supported collaborative learning phase immediately afterwards. It was hypothesized that in both phases current motivation (in terms of expectancy and value components) influences both learning activities and knowledge acquisition in a positive way. According to main results, only goal orientations (before learning) were associated with knowledge acquisition respectively observed learning activities during the collaborative phase. Expectancy and value components of current motivation related neither to observed learning activities nor to knowledge acquisition during collaborative learning but were in part associated with learning activities and knowledge acquisition during individual learning. The discussion addresses several possible explanations for these unexpected results. 相似文献
17.
Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments provide learners with multiple representational tools for storing, sharing, and constructing knowledge. However, little is known about how learners organize knowledge through multiple representations about complex socioscientific issues. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate learners’ knowledge organization (KO) through multiple representations in a CSCL environment. We designed a learning unit on nuclear energy and implemented it with a group of 20 college students. The participants used a web-based hypertext KO platform that incorporated three representational modes: textual, pictorial, and concept map. The platform interlinked learners’ knowledge entries based on similar keywords. Utilizing mixed methods research we analyzed the individual entries and the knowledge base to determine KO both at the individual and the collective levels. We found that the density of the knowledge base was high; the learners mostly benefited from their text- and concept map-based entries, though the picture-based entries were also an important means for connecting entries with similar content and hence creating a dense knowledge base. Our results suggest that KO with multiple representations can create a more comprehensive knowledge base. Using distinct analytical approaches will allow CSCL researchers to better identify KO both at the individual and collective levels. 相似文献
18.
Carol K. K. Chan 《Metacognition and Learning》2012,7(1):63-73
This discussion paper for this special issue examines co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning
(CSCL) environments extending research on self-regulated learning in computerbased environments. The discussion employs a
socio-cognitive perspective focusing on social and collective views of learning to examine how students co-regulate and collaborate
in computer-supported inquiry. Following the review of the articles, theoretical, methodological and instructional implications
are discussed: Future research directions include examining the theoretical nature of collective regulation and social metacognition
in building models of co-regulated learning; expanding methodological approaches using trace data and multiple measures for
convergence and construct validity; and conducting instructional experiments to test and to foster the development of co-regulated
learning in computer-supported collaborative inquiry. 相似文献
19.
话语分析-研究CSCL中协作意义建构的新方法 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)中学习者主要是通过对话来进行意义建构的,意义体现在话语之中。因此话语成为研发和分析协作意义建构的焦点。在过去的二十年中,研究话语正在成为研究社会情境下学习的一个重要的理论视角,因此通过研究话语来研究网络教育成为该领域的一个新的研究路径。文章在探讨了话语的概念和特点的基础上,阐述了话语分析的发展历程和理论基础。结合CSCL中协作意义建构的特点,提出了适合运用话语分析方法研究问题的要素、原则和方法,最后提出了运用话语分析可以研究的CSCL问题及其意义。 相似文献
20.
Jeroen Janssen Gijsbert Erkens Paul A. Kirschner Gellof Kanselaar 《Instructional Science》2010,38(1):59-88
This research investigates the role of representational guidance by comparing the effects of two different representational
tools. We used a design with two different groups defined by the type of argumentative diagram students co-constructed while
working in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. The Graphical Debate-tool offered different representational
guidance than the Textual Debate-tool. The results show that groups that worked with the Graphical Debate-tool constructed
representations of higher quality and wrote essays that were better in terms of grounds quality. Furthermore, working with
the Graphical Debate-tool was found to have a positive effect on students’ learning as measured by a knowledge post-test.
In contrast to our expectations however, there was little difference between the two conditions regarding the online collaboration
process. It can be concluded that representational guidance has an impact on group and individual performance and should therefore
be taken into account during instructional design. 相似文献