共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 250 毫秒
1.
采用键盘敲击任务探讨学习者主观估计错误活动、结果反馈时机(knowledge of results,简称KR)对运动技能学习的影响.抽取90名右利手的在校大学生,随机分为:主观估计无KR组、主观估计及时KR组、主观估计延迟KR组,算术活动无KR组,算术活动及时KR组,算术活动延迟KR组(组间性别均衡设计).主观估计错误活动组在练习间以口头报告的形式评估自己刚才操作总时间的误差,算术活动组按照实验员的要求进行数字算术口头运算.无KR组不提供KR,及时KR组在主观估计错误活动或算术活动后即刻获得KR,延迟KR组则延迟4s获得KR.第1-2天,6组受试者在各自的条件下分别练习,每天练习108次.第3天,练习后,休息10min,使用原任务进行保持测试10次,要求受试者每次测试后口头报告自己操作的总时间.第4天,使用原任务进行保持测试10次,要求受试者每次测试后口头报告自己操作的总时间.结果显示:(1)练习后从事主观估计错误活动,并能及时获得KR的学习者,保持测试的绩效最好;(2)主观估计错误活动影响提供KR的适宜时机. 相似文献
2.
年龄对结果反馈时间点适宜值的影响 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
采用二维轨迹追踪任务探讨年龄对结果反馈(KR)时间点适宜值的影响。抽取150名右利手的18～22岁、35～39岁、60～64岁各50人,分为3组(每组男女各25名)。三组受试者分别在5种KR反馈条件下,练习两维轨迹追踪任务3天,每天练习30次。第3天练习结束后休息10min,3组受试者进行无KR保持测试。一天后,再进行无KR的保持测试。结果显示:(1)年龄影响延迟KR在运动技能学习中的作用;(2)年龄与KR时间点适宜值存在相互作用,随着个体年龄的增长,年龄与KR时间点适宜值之间呈现U型关系,即延迟4s提供KR利于中年组个体自身觉察错误能力的形成,而即刻提供KR利于青年组和老年组个体自身觉察错误能力的形成。以上结果还提示,自身觉察错误能力形成发展的趋势与个体生长发育的规律相吻合。 相似文献
3.
任务性质、结果反馈时机与运动技能的学习 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
采用键盘敲击任务探讨任务性质、结果反馈时机对运动技能学习的影响.将100名右优势手大学生随机分为开放性和封闭性任务组(男女各25名),两组分别在5种KR条件下,练习开放或封闭任务3天,每天练习108次.第3天练习结束后休息10min,进行不提供KR的保持测试10次.24 h后,进行无KR保持测试10次.结果显示:(1)在封闭性运动技能学习中延迟KR更有利,而即刻KR促进开放性运动技能的学习;(2)提供KR的适宜时机受任务性质影响.与开放性技能相比,操作封闭性技能时,提供KR的适宜时机应延迟. 相似文献
4.
采用单维电脑追踪任务,探讨反馈频率对追踪任务技能学习的影响作用.48名右利手的在校大学生随机分为4组(每组男、女各6人),分别按反馈次数占总练习次数比例的25%、50%、75%、100%的频率方式向各组受试者提供当前反馈.结果显示:①获得阶段,频繁反馈有利于提高操作绩效;②保持阶段,减少反馈频率有利于简单追踪任务技能学习.结论:①当前反馈对于练习者学习动作技能具有很强的指导作用,并且容易使学习者对反馈产生依赖性;②通过减少反馈频率的方式可以减少学习者对反馈的依赖作用;③追踪任务技能学习过程中存在反馈频率适宜值. 相似文献
5.
通过不同情境中KR时间点适宜值的变化，探讨不同情境因素对自身觉察错误能力形成的影响，以期深入探测运动技能学习中自身觉察错误能力的形成机制。结果显示：只有根据操作情境的任务、个体和环境特征，在适宜的时机提供KR才能促进运动技能学习；KR时间点适宜值不是固定的点，受到诸如任务难度、任务性质、个体技能熟练程度、年龄和视觉反馈等多种情境因素的影响，不断发生变化和波动，并且在不同情境中KR时间点适宜值的变化，可以间接反映该情境中个体自身觉察错误能力形成和发展状况；运动技能学习中，个体自身觉察错误能力的形成受到任务复杂程度、任务性质、个体技能熟练程度、年龄、视觉反馈等情境因素影响。 相似文献
6.
采用两维电脑追踪任务,探讨个体技能熟练程度对反馈频率适宜值的影响作用.96名右利手在校大学生随机分为低练组和高练组(每组男、女各24名).首先,高练组受试者在100%反馈频率条件下练习2天,每天练习36次;同期,低练组受试者不进行练习,2天练习结束后,结果表明,经过不同练习量的练习,高练组受试者和低练组受试者之间形成了动作技能熟练程度的差异.此后,两组受试者分别在25%反馈频率、50%反馈频率、75%反馈频率、100%反馈频率条件下,连续2天练习两维复杂电脑追踪任务,每天练习36次.第2天练习结束后休息10 min,两组受试者进行无反馈保持测试.24 h后,再进行无反馈的保持测试.研究结果显示,获得阶段,两组受试者的操作绩效随反馈频率增加呈提高趋势;50%反馈频率有利于高练组受试的动作技能学习,75%反馈频率有利于低练组受试的动作技能学习;个体技能熟练程度与反馈频率适宜值存在交互作用,与低练组受试者相比,高练组学习动作技能时应适当减少反馈频率.提示,个体技能熟练程度影响反馈频率适宜值;技能熟练程度较高的个体学习动作技能时,应适当减少反馈频率. 相似文献
7.
任务复杂程度对反馈频率适宜值的影响研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
采用单维简单和两维复杂电脑追踪任务,探讨任务复杂程度对反馈频率适宜值的影响.96名右利手的在校大学生随机分为简单任务和复杂任务组(每组男、女各24名).两组受试者分别在25%相对频率(提供反馈的练习次数占总练习次数的25%,简称反馈频率,下同)、50%反馈频率、75%反馈频率、100%反馈频率条件下,连续两天练习简单或复杂任务,每天练习36次.第2天练习结束后休息10min,2组受试者进行无反馈保持测试.一天后,再进行无反馈的保持测试.结果显示:(1)练习阶段,两组受试者的操作绩效随反馈频率增加呈提高趋势;(2)50%反馈频率利于简单任务的技能学习,75%反馈频率利于复杂任务的技能学习;(3)任务复杂程度与反馈频率适宜值存在交互作用,与简单任务相比,操作复杂任务时,应增加反馈的频率.以上结果提示:当信息加工负荷较小(如操作任务较简单)时,减少反馈频率利于技能学习;而当信息加工负荷较大(操作任务较复杂)时,频繁反馈利于技能学习. 相似文献
8.
9.
采用两维电脑追踪任务,探讨任务性质对反馈频率适宜值的影响。将大学生随机分为开放性任务和封闭性任务组,两组受试者分别在不同的反馈频率条件下,连续两天练习开放性或封闭性任务。结果显示:获得阶段,两组受试者的操作绩效随反馈频率增加呈提高趋势;任务性质与反馈频率适宜值存在交互作用;与封闭性任务相比,操作开放性任务时,应适当增加反馈的频率。提示:动作技能学习中,任务性质影响反馈频率适宜值。 相似文献
10.
王晓波 《西安体育学院学报》2011,28(5):603-608
观察使用计算机追踪任务探讨任务性质、观察学习和身体练习比例对运动技能学习的影响。72名受试划分为开放性任务学习组和封闭性任务学习组,然后再根据观察学习+身体练习比例将受试随机分为25%观察学习+75%身体练习组、50%观察学习+50%身体练习组、以及75%观察学习+25%身体练习组,进行为期3 d的计算机追踪任务学习。第3 d学习结束后,对所有受试进行即刻测试2、4 h后保持测试和迁移测试。结果显示:对于封闭性任务技能学习而言,50%观察学习+50%身体练习的比例所获得的学习效果好于25%观察学习+75%身体练习的比例和75%观察学习+25%身体练习的比例;对于开放性任务技能学习而言,25%观察学习+75%身体练习的比例所获得的学习效果好于75%观察学习+25%身体练习的比例;使用相同比例条件下,封闭性任务技能的学习效果好于开放性任务技能。 相似文献
11.
Recent studies (Chiviacowsky & Wulf, 2002, 2005) have shown that learners prefer to receive feedback after they believe they had a "good" rather than "poor" trial. The present study followed up on this finding and examined whether learning would benefit if individuals received feedback after good relative to poor trials. Participants practiced a task that required them to throw beanbags at a target with their nondominant arm. Vision was prevented during and after the throws. All participants received knowledge of results (KR) on three trials in each 6-trial block. While one group (KR good) received KR for the three most effective trials in each block, another (KR poor) received feedback for the three least effective trials in each block. There were no group differences in practice. However the KR good group showed learning advantages on a delayed retention test (without KR). These results demonstrated that learning is facilitated if feedback is provided after good rather than poor trials. The findings are interpreted as evidence for a motivational function of feedback. 相似文献
12.
Recent studies (Chiviacowsky & Wulf, 2002, 2005) have shown that learners prefer to receive feedback after they believe they had a “good” rather than “poor”trial. The present study followed up on this finding and examined whether learning would benefit if individuals received feedback after good relative to poor trials. Participants practiced a task that required them to throw beanbags at a target with their nondominant arm. Vision was prevented during and after the throws. All participants received knowledge of results (KR) on three trials in each 6-trial block. While one group (KR good) received KR for the three most effective trials in each block, another (KR poor) received feedback for the three least effective trials in each block. There were no group differences in practice. However, the KR good group showed learning advantages on a delayed retention test (without KR). These results demonstrated that learning is facilitated if feedback is provided after good rather than poor trials. The findings are interpreted as evidence for a motivational function of feedback. 相似文献
13.
This experiment investigates the recent proposal of Schmidt, Young, Swinnen, and Shapiro (1989) that summary knowledge of results (KR) improves skill retention. In Schmidt et al.'s experiment, however, summary length varied concomitantly with the frequency of KR presentation. The current investigation held KR presentation frequency constant while manipulating the number of trials seen in the summary KR display. Subjects were required to perform a timing task on a linear slide. Five groups (n = 12) of subjects participated in acquisition trials then in 10-min and 2-day delayed no-KR retention tests. In 4 conditions, subjects completed each acquisition block without any KR, but following each block they received KR on either 15, 7, 3, or 1 of the 15 trials performed in that block. In the final condition subjects received immediate KR. Analysis of the absolute constant error (magnitude of CE) data for acquisition revealed all groups improved with practice and the immediate KR group performed better than all the summary groups which in turn did not differ significantly. Analysis of the magnitude of CE retention data found performance to be worse on the 2-day retention test for all groups. The effect of condition was significant. The 1/1 group had lower error scores than all other groups, which in turn were not significantly different. Analyses of variable error (VE) revealed only that VE decreased with practice. These findings suggest frequency of KR presentation may be the basis for the summary KR effect found by Schmidt et al. (1989). 相似文献
14.
Abstract The present experiment investigated the effects of interpolated processing activity (IPA) during the post knowledge of results (KR) interval. The study attempted to correct some of the problems inherent in previous research by using a ballistic timing criterion task and assessing the effects of interpolated processing activity (IPA) on both acquisition and No KR transfer trials. To insure that the efficacy of the IPA manipulation, a paced task was used and performance was assessed. Two levels of post-KR delay (5 and 10 s) were factorially combined with two levels of IPA (IPA or No IPA) to yield four experimental groups. Each subject completed 30 KR acquisition trials and 20 No KR transfer trials. Interresponse interval was held constant. In contrast to many previous studies, IPA interfered with the subjects' ability to learn and perform the criterion movement time of 150 ms. Both the memory trace and the perceptual trace were similarly affected. The detrimental effects of IPA on absolute error and objective-subjective error differences found during acquisition persisted during KR withdrawal. 相似文献
15.
Pentti Teräslinna 《Research quarterly for exercise and sport》2013,84(1):154-156
To assess the role of qualitative knowledge of results (KR) in children's motor learning, four-year-old subjects performed a linear positioning task. Children were divided into three groups, each varying on KR precision. A significant reduction in variable error (p < .05) over trials seemed to indicate that children can utilize KR to become more consistent in learning. No significant differences were found among the three KR groups; however, the most precise KR condition tended to show fewer errors than the least precise KR condition. Some recommendations for future research are discussed. 相似文献
16.
Jerry R. Thomas Beverly Mitchell Melinda A. Solmon 《Research quarterly for exercise and sport》2013,84(4):687-698
In motor skill performance and retention the complexity of knowledge of results should interact with the child's processing rate. This rate has been demonstrated to increase with age. Two experiments were designed to assess this hypothesis. In Experiment 1, 30 7-year-old and 30 10-year-old boys were randomly assigned within age level to three knowledge of results (KR) conditions: no KR, general KR, and precise KR. Performance was assessed on a vertical positioning task at two angles, 60° and 100°, for 10 performance trials. The preciseness of KR interacted with age and the degree of the angle, indicating that at the more difficult angle (60°) preciseness may have been detrimental to the performance of the 7-year-olds but beneficial to the 10-year-olds. At the easier angle (100°), precise KR improved performance for both age groups. In Experiment 2, 27 second-grade and 27 fourth-grade children were randomly assigned within age groups to the same three levels of KR preciseness. A horizontal curvilinear positioning task was used as the motor task and subjects were given 40 acquisition and 19 KR withdrawal trials. Results suggested that while KR was better than no KR during learning, the level of KR preciseness was of minor importance. However, the preciseness of KR during acquisition was of considerable value after KR was withdrawn (retention phase). The older children were able to use more precise KR to form a perceptual trace more resistant to forgetting, while the younger children were unable to use the additional information contained in precise KR. 相似文献
17.
The present study crossed three knowledge of results summarizing techniques (single-trial KR, summary KR, and average KR) with two spacing conditions (KR on every fifth trial-20%- and KR on every trial-100%). Participants (n = 10 per group) performed 80 acquisition trials of a ballistic movement task involving both a temporal and spatial goal, followed by 30 immediate (10 min) and 30 delayed (2 days) no-KR transfer trials. For the spatial goal, performance was less accurate (absolute constant error) for the 20% spacing condition than the 100% condition during acquisition, but more accurate during delayed transfer. No effects were significant for variable error. For the temporal goal, performance was more accurate for the summary and average conditions than the single-trial KR condition; however, this effect was only present within the 20% spacing condition and only during Block 1 of acquisition. A similar effect held for variable error as well, except that the effect persisted for acquisition and transfer. It was concluded that the spacing of KR is more influential in promoting spatial accuracy than the summarizing of KR. 相似文献
18.
Craig A. Wrisberg J. Herbert Paul Michael R. Ragsdale 《Research quarterly for exercise and sport》2013,84(4):699-708
The effect of subject gender and knowledge of results (KR) on receptor anticipation (Poulton, 1957) was investigated. Twenty trials were given in which subjects (N = 80) attempted to time a preferred-hand button press response coincident with the lighting of the last of a series of runway lights illuminating in a pattern of apparent motion of 9 mph. Half of the subjects received quantitative KR after each trial and half performed without KR. Each group contained 20 males and 20 females. Mean absolute error, mean algebraic error, and variable error were calculated for each subject on the block of trials 2 to 5 and on the three subsequent 5-trial blocks. The dependent measures were then analyzed by means of separate 2 × 2 × 4 (Gender × KR × Blocks) ANOVAs with repeated measures on the last factor. The results indicated that the receptor anticipation of males was more accurate and less variable than that of females, and KR did not influence the accuracy of anticipations but was associated with higher intravariability. Sociocultural and physiological explanations for sex differences in receptor anticipation are discussed. 相似文献