共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 205 毫秒
1.
基于博雅教育理念,借鉴国内外一流高校在大学物理实验教学中的成功经验,从教学目的、教学内容、教学方法和实验室文化等方面对我校大学物理实验教学系统进行了讨论. 相似文献
2.
3.
加强技能培养的实验教学模式构建 总被引：3，自引：1，他引：3
结合大学物理实验教学改革实践,从改革实验课程体系出发,介绍优化教学内容、改革教学方法、制订新的考核办法几个方面构建加强技能培养的实验教学模式。新的教学模式突出对学生动手能力、设计能力、创新能力等实验技能培养,有效提高了实验教学质量。 相似文献
4.
本文运用问卷调查法,从实验室配备、教学内容、教学方式及学习方式、考核方式等方面对大学物理实验教学现状进行了调查研究.并基于调查结果提出合理利用现有资源、加强实验设备管理;开设与专业相结合的物理实验项目并增加综合性、设计性实验比例;确立以学生自学为主、老师指导为辅的教学方式;建立平时与期末测试相结合、且注重学生创新能力培养的成绩考核方式等教学对策,以期能够提高大学物理实验课程教学质量. 相似文献
5.
结合“大学物理实验”课程现有的教学内容、教学手段及实验教学条件情况,对大学物理实验教学内容进行了重组,构建了基础性、综合性、设计性以及演示性实验四个层次的实践教学内容体系,每学期开设一堂高效演示实验课.实践表明,重组后的大学物理实验教学内容体系有效地改善了实验教学的效果. 相似文献
6.
基于我国大学物理实验教学中存在的问题和不足,引入并分析了开放式实验教学的内涵和必要性,从教学时间、实验空间、教学内容、教学方法四个方面给出了开放性教学模式的建构策略。 相似文献
7.
针对大学物理实验课教学的现状,结合高校理科物理学专业对普通物理实验教学的基本要求,以努力培养创新人才为目的,讨论了教学模式、教学方法、教学内容和实验考核的改革设想;提倡在物理实验教学中引入实验定量考核作为实验教学的必要措施,陈述了关于设计性实验的一些建议,同时强调在物理实验教学中优化学生的实验心理. 相似文献
8.
结合大学物理实验教学改革实践,从教学方法、教学内容和考评方式等方面对实验教学新体系进行了论述。新的实验教学体系有利于激发学生学习兴趣和求知欲,培养和提高创新意识和创新能力。 相似文献
9.
介绍了模拟电子技术实验课程的教学现状及面临的各种问题,通过教学实践对该实验课程的教学改革进行了探索,包括:在教学内容方面整合实验项目、加强仪器仪表的使用、增加仿真技术的学习;在教学方法上运用"任务驱动"教学法的教学思想,将多媒体技术教学手段应用在实验教学的预习环节、课堂讲解过程中以及课后复习环节中;在实验考核方面采取实际操作加笔试的考核方式等。这些实验教学的改革措施,激发了学生的学习兴趣,改善了实验教学效果。 相似文献
10.
宁土荣古迪赖国霞申惠娟车囿达邓锂强 《实验室研究与探索》2023,(4):237-240
基于目前大学物理实验教学中所呈现出的教学模式保守、教学内容陈旧、教学方法呆板、考评方式单一等问题,设计了不同方法测量三棱镜的折射率并拟合其色散曲线的设计性物理实验。介绍了实验题目选择、实验方案设计、实验操作实施、实验过程汇报、实验论文撰写等设计性物理实验开设的全过程以及考评方式。设计性教学方式的运用成功激发了学生的学习兴趣与探索精神,培养学生的创新思维以及科研能力,提高了实验教学质量。 相似文献
11.
基于整合技术的学科教学知识(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge,TPACK)的研究现状分析,文章首先对TPACK要素进行了界定。随后,文章对4名高校英语教师在参与慕课教学过程中TPACK的发展进行了实证研究,结果发现:4名教师的TPACK各要素均得到了不同程度的发展,其中发展最明显的TPACK要素是整合技术的教学策略知识、整合技术的评估知识,其次是有关学生的知识和课程知识,发展最不易的是整合技术的学科教学统领观念。基于此结论,文章针对高校教师TPACK的持续发展提出了相关建议,以期助力高校教师有效整合信息技术,推进高校教学方式和教学观念的转型。 相似文献
12.
Assessing university students' perceptions of their Physics instructors' TPACK development in two contexts 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Yahui Chang Syh‐Jong Jang Yang‐Hsueh Chen 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2015,46(6):1236-1249
Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) has been gaining traction among educational researchers; however, studies documenting university students' perceptions of their teachers' TPACK remain limited. This study intends to investigate the professional development of two physics instructors through the lens of the TPACK framework. Moreover, this study spans an 18‐week semester within both the contexts of Taiwan and China. Multiple data were collected and analyzed, including the pretest and posttest TPACK surveys, instructor interviews, in‐class observations and students' feedback and opinions. The results revealed that John's instructional representations and strategies and technology integration and application scores increased significantly, as well as Mike's knowledge of students' understanding score showing a significant increase from the middle to the end of semester. John (Taiwan) emphasized life examples and the use of multimedia while Mike (China) chose to emphasize students' knowledge and evaluation. Such results showed different teaching characteristics in the two contexts. Implications and suggestions are put forward based on the results of this study. 相似文献
13.
熊泽本 《邢台职业技术学院学报》2013,30(2):23-26
通过分析传统大学物理实验教学的弊端和教学内容的改革背景,阐述了分层次实验教学模式和网络化实验室管理形式,提出了大学物理实验教学内容的更新策略和改革的原则,说明了大学物理实验教学内容的改革和更新在教学过程中的具体落实,有利于素质教育、创新教育的开展,有利于充分发挥大学物理实验课程对学生综合素质的培养功能,有效推进课程改革,形成与时俱进、特色鲜明的大学物理教学内容新体系。 相似文献
14.
当前,国内的大学物理教学课程审视了已有的物理实验教学的体系,并且与国外的教学实践与方式相联系,对我国的大学物理实验教学进行了一定的改革与创新.使得实验教学中的观念和意识、创新和方法等更加的注重传统与现代、知识能力与技能创新等方面的结合,推动了大学教学改革系统的顺利进行,对于大学生综合素质的培养有积极的促进作用.因此,本文主要结合笔者自身的工作经验,针对大学物理实验教学的改革进行探索与分析,提出相关的建议,供参考和借鉴. 相似文献
15.
该文以蚌埠学院为例,对大学物理实验教学的一些实践经验进行总结,讨论了在＂工程化＂教育理念下加强大学物理实验教学创新性研究的几点措施：改进大学物理实验教学方法,培育创新素质;重视开放性实验室建设,提供创新资源;开展课外科技竞赛活动,培养创新精神;鼓励学生参与教科研项目,增强创新意识;加强大学物理实验教材建设,体现创新成果;加强实验工作队伍建设,提高创新能力. 相似文献
16.
Yi‐Fen Yeh Ying‐Shao Hsu Hsin‐Kai Wu Fu‐Kwun Hwang Tzu‐Chiang Lin 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2014,45(4):707-722
Technological pedagogical content knowledge TPACK refers to the knowledge set that teachers currently use to further improve the quality of their teaching and assist their students in learning. Several TPACK models have been proposed, either for discussing TPACK's possible composition or its practical applications. Considering that teachers' practical experiences should also be critical to the development of those teachers' knowledge, this study invited a research panel (six researchers) and an expert panel (54 science‐related educators) to propose and validate the framework of TPACK‐practical. After two rounds of anonymous communications that followed Delphi survey techniques, a total of eight dimensions of TPACK‐practical and corresponding indicators were identified and rated as having high levels of importance. Among these knowledge dimensions, the knowledge of direct information and communication technology uses for enhancing teachers' professionalism and students' conceptual comprehension was rated with a high level of importance. Also, disciplinary differences were found to exist between the different groups of experts. Biology teachers showed significantly higher ratings across all knowledge dimensions, whereas physics teachers' ratings were comparatively low. Such findings suggest that the structure and content of subject matter shapes not only the way they teach with technology but also the thinking logics they build longitudinally from their learning experiences. 相似文献
17.
Meredith J. C. Swallow Mark W. Olofson 《Journal of Research on Technology in Education》2017,49(3-4):228-244
The technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) framework considers the role of technology in teaching. Although TPACK is grounded in context, one limitation is the lack of understanding about the interactions between particular contexts, knowledge development, and instruction. This qualitative multiple-case study was designed to explore the contextual factors that contribute to teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge and practice. Researchers focused on the Catholic educational environment to develop a more refined understanding of specific, and unique, contextual factors within the TPACK framework. Individual case analysis of interview and observation data pointed toward microlevel, or teacher-centric, factors, including background, attitudes, and personal conceptualization of contemporary education, to be primary influences of the development and use of technological knowledge. Recommendations are made for educators to think about how changes in context influence the distinct overlapping components of the TPACK framework, and accordingly their individual TPACK. (Keywords: TPACK, educational technology, teacher practice, teacher context) 相似文献
18.
Miguel Gómez 《学校用计算机》2015,32(3-4):278-299
The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) conceptual framework, since its introduction in 2006, has provided researchers and teacher educators a theoretical means by which to understand the knowledge required to teach effectively with technology. However, a clear picture of what TPACK looks like in practice is still in its infancy. Using a case-study approach, this research examines the teaching practices of an eighth-grade social studies teacher, specifically how the teacher operationalizes TPACK within his classroom. Four examples of TPACK practices are given along with the teacher's rationale for his technology use. Two themes emerged: the transformation of technology into something that just happens in the classroom and the teacher's use of technology to shape instruction. Implications from this case study are then discussed, including the process and timing of combining the different knowledge components of TPACK and the need to better capture the role of students in the TPACK model. 相似文献
19.
Most countries stress that preparing quality teachers for twenty-first century students is an essential task for teacher training institutions. Besides the skills for how to teach subjects effectively, teachers should also know how to integrate digital technology into their teaching. Several studies have been done based on the TPACK framework. Some of these studies use this framework for specific subject domains. In this study a generally applicable instrument for measuring TPACK was created. The aim of the paper was to validate the created instrument and to find out how pre-service teachers perceive their technological, pedagogical and content knowledge regarding the TPACK framework in Estonia, in a technologically highly developed country where technology is broadly used in general education. Conducting factor analysis all items with technology merged into one factor meaning that young generation perceives technology already integrated with content and pedagogy. The results indicate that pre-service teachers lack pedagogical knowledge, but they perceive that they are good at integrating technology into their teaching. Differences in perceptions were also found according to gender, age and curricula. 相似文献