共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
高中课程标准中可持续发展教育内容探讨 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
开展可持续发展教育是实施可持续发展战略的重要手段，也是我国基础教育领域深化素质教育的重要内容。本从可持续发展教育内容的界定入手，提出中国可持续发展教育的内容，在此基础上，分析了新高中课程标准中不同学科对可持续发展教育的定位、内容及特点。 相似文献
2.
试论教育投资的可持续发展 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
鲁茗 《辽宁教育行政学院学报》1997,(3)
教育投资走可持续发展之路是我国教育发展战略的重要内容。本文从我国教育投资的国情出发，分析教育投资可持续发展的内在机理，提出教育投资可持续发展的基本构想 相似文献
3.
白彩敏 《中国科教创新导刊》2009,(22):58-58
作为一种新的教育理念和方式,可持续发展教育是可持续发展战略的重要组成部分。作为新课标精神下的产物,初中科学课程与可持续发展教育不仅有密切联系而且蕴含了很多可持续发展教育的内容,对此,本文着重对初中科学教学中可持续发展教育的内容与实施策略展开了探讨。 相似文献
4.
幼儿教育的新视点:可持续发展教育 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
20世纪80代以来，可持续发展的理念已经在世界范围内广为传播，可持续发展教育由此开始展开。各国幼教人士开始探讨幼儿可持续发展教育的意义、目标、内容与方法，认为幼儿可持续发展教育应当成为可持续发展教育体系的重要组成部分，并在促进世界可持续发展中发挥应有的作用。 相似文献
5.
宋五好 《三门峡职业技术学院学报》2007,6(2):59-61
可持续发展教育是伴随可持续发展战略的提出而产生的,它既是可持续发展战略的重要组成部分,又是实现可持续发展战略的手段;而由于科技的发展、生产力水平的提高、人口的增加、资源的紧张等原因所导致的人与自然的关系紧张,促使人类开始反思人与自然关系所出现的生态伦理,它与可持续发展的内涵有着密切的联系。从可持续发展战略和可持续发展教育的内容不难看出生态伦理在其中的重要位置,生态伦理是可持续发展战略及其教育中核心的观念形态。 相似文献
6.
7.
可持续发展是一次广泛的社会变革,教育要随之而动并积极推进教育自身的变革。可持续发展是新世纪教育内容变革的时代要求;要将代际教育纳入教育指向变革的视野;教育方针变革应促进人的可持续发展能力;可持续发展呼唤学科教学的变革;思想教育变革要研究并适应可持续发展新的伦理建构;学校是可持续发展的教育机构和实践基地,应以可持续发展思路推进学校建设和变革;教育要从惯性发展向科学的创新发展转变,酝酿并实施具有创新特征的教育变革;为了可持续发展的教育是教育面向世界的重要主题,通过教育变革推进中国教育发展,提升中国教育对人类社会发展的贡献力。 相似文献
8.
可持续发展教育是建设我国和谐社会的重要战略措施。站在可持续发展教育的视角审视教育信仰,对于实现教育的可持续发展具有深刻的时代意义。教育信仰是实现可持续发展教育的重要保证。 相似文献
9.
科学课程进行可持续发展教育,是学科教学实施素质教育的必然要求,对学生进行国情教育、辩证唯物主义自然观的教育,是科学教学渗透可持续发展教育的重要内容,文章从科学教学与可持续发展教育的关系,科学课程如何实施可持续发展教育,教学中进行可持续发展教育的几个原则等问题展开探讨并提出学科教学进行可持续发展教育的渗透性、实践性、系统性原则。 相似文献
10.
近年来,日本在响应联合国教科文组织的号召,推进可持续发展教育事业方面做出了积极的贡献。日本中央政府初期通过出台一系列教育政策来普及可持续发展教育事业,而随着教育事业全面转向学校实践之后,中央政府与地方政府通过为学校、教师间搭建交流平台来支持可持续发展教育事业的全面开展。在学校实践层面,可持续发展教育实践主题多样,内容丰富,教育形式以课外活动为主,并具有以下两个特点：分阶段教学,配合学生的心智发展是其一个重要特点;将地域文化引入实践,因地制宜,充分发挥地区优势是其另一个重要特点。 相似文献
11.
Adam Cheeseman Jaylene Murray Marcia McKenzie 《Environmental Education Research》2019,25(12):1697-1712
AbstractThis paper provides a review of the current literature that examines the uptake of sustainability policies in higher education. Articles were retrieved from both ERIC and Scopus databases and then manually reviewed to ensure that they focused on each of: higher education; sustainability; and policy. A total of 91 articles were analysed using a multi-stage process that involved sorting data according to typologies (i.e. temporal, terminology, methodology, geography), coding the text of the articles based on topical content, and an indexing method used to label data for further analysis and the development of broader code categories. Results suggest that drivers and barriers associated with the integration of sustainability policy in higher education are well known; yet increased research is needed to understand best practices and processes by which sustainability can be furthered through higher education policy. In addition, findings demonstrate the need for future research to focus on various aspects of the policy process, including policy development and enactment, and on implications of policy for practice. While there have been some reviews of sustainability policy in higher education research to date, this review contributes to this literature by highlighting research primarily focused on sustainability policy within higher education. 相似文献
12.
Neus Evans Hilary Whitehouse Margaret Gooch 《The Journal of environmental education》2013,44(2):121-138
There are many documented barriers to implementing school-based sustainability. This article examines a) the barriers faced by principals and staff in two regional primary schools in Far North Queensland, Australia, well known for their exemplary practice, and b) ways the barriers were overcome. Through interviews conducted with principals and key staff, the authors found lack of time, direct funding for innovation, teacher conceptual understanding, resistance from some fellow staff to sustainability education, and being positioned as a “greenie” were presented as barriers to effective practice. The research reveals how innovation, determination, trust, and active principal support enabled the teachers to push ahead. Other educators experiencing difficulties with implementing sustainability education will likely find the discussion useful. 相似文献
13.
Janet E. Dyment Julie M. Davis Diane Nailon Sherridan Emery Seyum Getenet Nadine McCrea 《Environmental Education Research》2014,20(5):660-679
In recent times, Australia has recognised and enacted a range of initiatives at service, system and community levels that seek to embed sustainability into the early childhood sector. This paper explores the impact of a professional development (PD) session that provided opportunities for early childhood educators to learn and share ideas about the theory and practice of sustainability generally and early childhood education for sustainability (ECEfS) specifically. The PD was entitled ‘Living and Learning about Sustainability in the Early Years’ and was offered on three occasions across Tasmania. A total of 99 participants attended the three PD sessions (one 5 hour; two 2 hour). The participants had varying levels of experience and included early childhood teachers, centre based educators and preservice teachers. At the start and end of the PD, participants were invited to complete a questionnaire that contained a series of likert scale questions that explored their content knowledge, level of understanding and confidence in regards to ECEfS. Participants were also asked at the start and end of the PD to ‘list five words you think of when you consider the word sustainability.’ A model of teacher professional growth was used to conceptualise the results related to the changes in knowledge, understanding and confidence (personal domain) as a result of the PD related to ECEfS (external domain). The likert-scale questions on the questionnaire revealed significant positive changes in levels of knowledge, understanding and confidence from the start to the end of the PD. Differences as a function of length of PD, level of experience and role are presented and discussed. The ‘5 words’ question showed that participants widened their understandings of ECEfS from a narrow environmental focus to a broader understanding of the social, political and economic dimensions. The early childhood education and care (ECEC) sector has been characterised as having a pedagogical advantage for EfS suggesting that early childhood educators are well placed to engage with EfS more readily than might educators in other education sectors. This article argues that PD is necessary to develop capability in educators in order to meet the imperatives around sustainability outlined in educational policy and curriculum documents in ECEC. 相似文献
14.
This paper reports some findings from an investigation of educational practice in ten (formal and informal) education for sustainability (EfS) initiatives, to characterise exemplary practice in school and community education for sustainability, considered crucial to Australia’s future. The study focused on rural/regional Australia, specifically New South Wales sites in the Murray-Darling Basin (crucial to Australian agricultural economy, under substantial environmental threat, undergoing significant social and demographic change). The research used and explored new developments in practice theory, aiming to achieve innovative rich characterisations of individual and extra-individual (cultural, discursive, social, material) aspects of practice. The study aimed to derive implications for theory, policy and practice in relation to sustainability and EfS, practice theory, education, and more specifically education for the professions (including the initial education and continuing professional development of educators). 相似文献
15.
This article argues that the dominant sustainable development approach fails to acknowledge the interconnectedness and interrelatedness of social and environmental issues, and that sustainability requires a ‘transformational’ approach, involving a fundamental change in how humans relate to each other and to nature. The authors propose that virtue ethics, grounded in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, provides a framework with which to tackle such a transformation; to redress the human-nature relationship and help foster a more ecological perspective; to facilitate a more holistic and integrative view of sustainability; and to explore questions of how to live and flourish within a more sustainable world. Beginning with an overview of virtue ethics and critique of current approaches in environmental virtue ethics, this article proposes a new virtue, ‘harmony with nature’, that addresses the interconnectedness of our relationship with nature. This is followed by a proposal for the re-visioning of human flourishing as being necessarily situated within nature. The article concludes with some of the implications of a virtue ethics approach to sustainability, and the new virtue, for both sustainability education and moral education. 相似文献
16.
In this paper, we report on an investigation into sustainability education in schools in the Australian state of Tasmania following the implementation of the Australian Curriculum. Sustainability is one of three cross-curriculum priorities in the new national curriculum and is the focus of this research (sustainability cross-curriculum priority (CCP)). Principals and Curriculum Leaders (PCLs) from all schools in Tasmania were invited to complete a survey that asked them about their understanding of various aspects of sustainability and how the sustainability CCP was integrated across learning areas. Sixty-eight PCLs (24%) responded to the survey. They reported generally good understandings of sustainability and education for sustainability, but lesser understandings of the sustainability CCP and the nine organising ideas. Respondents’ understandings of sustainability were dominated by an environmental focus. The PCLs’ responses in relation to sustainability implementation across learning areas gave insights into ways that the sustainability CCP can serve as a pivot for cross-curricular teaching and learning, which is strongly advocated for achieving transformative sustainability education. We conclude this paper with a discussion of how the sustainability CCP is an important asset in the necessary reorientation of the Australian formal education system for a more sustainable future. We note the importance of professional support so that educators may better understand sustainability and its complexity as a cross-curricular priority and envision ways in which the sustainability CCP can be realised within education. 相似文献
17.
Susanne C. Paulus 《Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning》2016,16(2):117-130
This article explores a pluralist understanding of learning for sustainability in educational theory and relates it to outdoor education practice. In brief, this kind of learning can be described as a deep engagement with an individual’s multiple identities and the personal location in diverse geo-physical and socio-cultural surroundings. I identify the intersection of learning for sustainability and pluralism in three themes: learning as transformation, learning as participation and learning about identities and spaces. The reflections on what kind of learning outdoor education could seek to promote potentially help the field to clarify its role as a sustainable education approach. A programme designed to be responsive to both sustainability and pluralism would enable learners to explore the multifacetedness of a location and provide space for them to share and exchange individual experiences, perceptions and worldviews. 相似文献
18.
This study focuses on the impact of a sustainability leadership development program (SLDP) designed to develop staff members as leaders who encourage sustainability practices within institutions of higher education (IHE). Using the framework of community of practice (CoP), we explored the program’s contribution by interviewing 16 staff members who had attended the program. At the individual level, we found that the SLDP provided participants with opportunities to learn from and with other members of the CoP and to engage them in debate about the various meanings of ‘sustainability’, increasing their environmental awareness and their environmental involvement within the IHE’s community. At the institutional level, the SLDP disseminated the college’s socio-environmental mission statement, increased its administration’s commitment and involvement, served as a platform for addressing local socio-environmental problems and initiated an Education-for-Sustainability (EfS) activists’ network. However, the participants indicated that the SLDP had limited impact on the environmentalism of other staff members and that the on-going mentoring and support from the college administration was insufficient. This study highlights the importance of such EfS professional programs to the development of both staff members and entire institutions as sustainability leaders. It also suggests ways to increase staff involvement in institutional EfS discourse. 相似文献
19.
The ecological footprint as an educational tool for sustainability: A case study analysis in an Israeli public high school 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Dan Gottlieb Eran Vigoda-GadotAbraham Haim Meidad Kissinger 《International Journal of Educational Development》2012,32(1):193-200
Education is widely acknowledged to be a means for advancing environmental sustainability. Many schools have recently introduced the idea of sustainability into their educational agenda and curriculum. This study uses an innovative method of communicating the principle of sustainability, the ‘Ecological Footprint’ Analysis, which illustrates the impact of community lifestyles upon the natural environment. This paper describes the process of integrating the concept of the ecological footprint at the high school level, analyzes the school's ecological footprint, and discusses its contributions to education for sustainability in schools. 相似文献
20.
Orana Jade Sandri 《Environmental Education Research》2013,19(6):810-822
This paper presents a framework for understanding the role that systems theory might play in education for sustainability (EfS). It offers a sketch and critique of Land and Meyer’s notion of a ‘threshold concept’, to argue that seeing systems as a threshold concept for sustainability is useful for understanding the processes of learning for sustainability. With an understanding of systems approaches as a key part of the practice of sustainability, educators do well to focus on ways to facilitate learners’ internalisation of systems thinking through EfS. This is particularly relevant given that sustainable development requires learners to go out into the world and apply sustainability theory to create change. The capacity to do this, it is argued, depends on learners’ understanding and internalisation of the core concepts of sustainability, such as systems. 相似文献