首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
This article pursues the varying understandings of the photograph in archival literature. An in-depth review of the scholarship uncovers several possible reasons why archivists and those writing about photographic archives apparently continue to struggle with the photograph, including: the sheer difficulty that photographs as an elusive medium present; past debates about photography in art history, history, and archival literature; and the challenges that the photograph as an evasive document presents to the contradictory nature of archives themselves and to conceptions of archival science. Having evolved from an understanding of photographs that conflated content with meaning to postmodernist notions of contingent and plural meanings in which photographs participate, archival writings on the photograph hold promise as they begin to tread the waters that Schwartz charted in the last 15 years. This paper follows that historical progression in order to trace the discourse on photographic archives that has emerged over the past three decades.
Tim SchlakEmail:
  相似文献   

2.
User perspective and user studies have received noticeably little practical attention in archives and archival science. The purpose of this article is to address the issues of communication and user participation in archival contexts. Two action research projects-based digital archives are discussed. The insights gained during the research and development work are used to formulate a new approach to a participatory archive. In spite of the historical nature of the archives discussed, the suggested ways of interacting with an archive are not specific to historical records. The fundamental characteristics of the proposed approach are decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and contextualisation of both records and the entire archival process.
Isto HuvilaEmail:
  相似文献   

3.
This article examines the archival methods developed by Colbert to train his son in state administration. Based on Colbert’s correspondence with his son, it reveals the practices Colbert thought necessary to collect and manage information in his state encyclopedic archive during the last half of the 17th century.
Jacob SollEmail:
  相似文献   

4.
This article analyses the extent to which archival exemptions for historical, scientific and statistical research in privacy legislation support preservation in selected European Union countries, and comparable aspects of Australian, American and Canadian law within a legal, ethical and digital archival perspective. The authors recommend that the further processing of personal data under data protection law be given a wider scope of interpretation for archival preservation purposes in both the public and private sector, coupled with the use of researcher and archival codes in relation to access to personal data. They also recommend early appraisal and integration of privacy with freedom of information and archival regimes.
Malcolm ToddEmail:
  相似文献   

5.
6.
An Australian Research Council project, Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, brought together experts in recordkeeping, privacy, confidentiality, intellectual property, torts, medical law and ethics to address concerns with a major networked Australian health record initiative. The research required developing innovative research tools and understandings, which provides an exemplar for methodologies to address multiple-disciplinary concerns and priorities that set a precedent for future inter-disciplinary collaborative projects concerned with the analysis and design of such systems. This article provides an analysis of the research design, methods, tools and findings of the project which operated within a records continuum framework.
Barbara ReedEmail:

Dr. Livia Iacovino   is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow with the Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics in the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia, where she has taught the legal and ethical curricula in the recordkeeping courses. Her research and publications are focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of archival science, law and ethics, in particular ownership, access and privacy of electronic records. She has been a Chief Investigator for Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant and has collaborated internationally with the InterPARES Project and the International Records Management Trust. Barbara Reed   has been involved with industry, teaching, research and standards setting, in the course of her 25 years in the recordkeeping and information management communities. She has been the Director of The Recordkeeping Institute since 2000 and has over 20 years consulting experience to all levels of government, private and public companies and not-for profit organisations. She has developed and negotiated Standards for recordkeeping at state, national and international levels. She has published widely on metadata definition and deployment, recordkeeping, interoperability, management of resources over time and digital preservation. She was a Research Associate in the Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, 2002–2005, and Clever Recordkeeping Metadata, 2005–2006, both ARC Projects.  相似文献   

7.
The article examines the transition of (West) German archivists from the Nazi period to the time of Allied occupation and on into the early years of the Federal Republic of Germany. After considering the extent of the profession’s nazification, the article focuses on Allied denazification efforts after the war and discusses the strategies archivists devised in order to maneuver through these dangerous times. In the end, the archival profession mastered the transition with only minor “denazification damage.” The article closes with an examination of the consequences of the continuity of personnel especially among the leading archivists of the former Prussian Archival Administration (Preussische Archivverwaltung) for the reconstruction of the archival profession in West Germany.
Astrid M. EckertEmail:

Astrid M. Eckert   is an Assistant Professor of Modern European History at Emory University in Atlanta. (M.A., University of Michigan, 1995; M.A. Free University Berlin, 1998; Dr. Phil. Free University Berlin, 2003). Before moving to Emory, she was a Research Fellow at the German Historical Institute (GHI) in Washington, D. C. (2002–2005). Her 2003 Dissertation on the history of captured German records after the Second World War was awarded the Friedrich Meinecke Dissertation Prize of Free University’s history department, and the biennial Hedwig Hintze Dissertation Award of the German Historical Association. The work was published in German in 2004 and will appear in English with Cambridge University Press as Fight for the Files: The Western Allies and the Captured German Archives after World War II. Her research interests include the history of postwar Germany, transnational historiographical questions, and, most recently, the political and cultural history of the inter-German border.  相似文献   

8.
This paper reviews the archival process at the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), a repository of digital social science data, and maps ICPSR’s Ingest and Access operations to the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model. The paper also assesses ICPSR’s conformance with the archival responsibilities of “trusted” OAIS repositories, with the proviso that audit criteria for archival certification are still under development. The ICPSR to OAIS mapping exercise has benefits for the larger social science archiving community because it provides an interpretation of the reference model in the quantitative social science environment and points to preservation-related issues that may be salient for other social science archives. Building on the archives’ long tradition of shared norms and cooperation, we may ultimately be able to design a federated system of trusted social science repositories that provides access to the global heritage.
Cole WhitemanEmail:
  相似文献   

9.
To put an end to the large copyright trade deficit, both Chinese government agencies and publishing houses have been striving for entering the international publication market. The article analyzes the background of the going-global strategy, and sums up the performance of both Chinese administrations and publishers.
Qing Fang (Corresponding author)Email:
  相似文献   

10.
This paper gives an overview of the archival issues that relate to digitally signed documents. First, by way of introduction, the advanced digital signature is presented briefly. In the second part, a number of problems are discussed that present themselves when a digital signature is used as a proof of authenticity and integrity for digital documents in general. In particular, it is also being investigated whether it makes any sense for the archivist to digitally sign all electronic records under his or her management. Problems relating to the (medium) long-term archiving of digitally signed documents are dealt with in the third part. After an overview of the sticking points for long-term validation (“Archival issues”) a number of possible solutions are discussed (“Solutions for long-term archiving”).
Filip BoudrezEmail:
  相似文献   

11.
A summary overview of the children’s and young adult publishing industry in China with a focus on the size of the market, ten major publishing houses, copyright and trends. Special emphasis has been placed on specific transaction for the sale of translation rights from German language publishers to China and minimal activities of German rights sold to Chinese publishers.
Jing BartzEmail:
  相似文献   

12.
This article analyzes current industry practices toward the identification of digital book content. It highlights key technology trends, workflow considerations and supply chain behaviors, and examines the implications of these trends and behaviors on the production, discoverability, purchasing and consumption of digital book products.
Andy WeissbergEmail:
  相似文献   

13.
The comparative study of archival inventories in early modern Switzerland reveals that three major regimes of inventorying logic emerged from the late fifteenth to the early eighteenth century. Early inventories constructed as lists gave way first to ideal-topographical inventories that relied on a double mapping of conceptual spaces against archival space and inventory pages, succeeded eventually by taxonomic inventories oriented around an active state apparatus and its needs. Synchronic and diachronic comparisons that focus on major reorganizations have proven effective in illustrating the scope and effectiveness of each of the successive regimes. A similar approach applied to major inventory projects across early modern Europe may identify further systems for making accumulating documents accessible to rulers, and may also allow us to trace genealogies of inventory practice regimes as they appeared in different regions, at different scales, and in diverse political contexts.
Randolph C. HeadEmail:

Randolph C. Head   has been a professor of History at the University of California, Riverside, since 1992, after studies at Harvard and the University of Virginia. His areas of research include the political culture of early modern Europe, the history of democracy, and religious coexistence before and after the Protestant Reformation. His current project on archival inventories in early modern Europe grew out of his interest in the origins and articulation of political knowledge and institutional culture in early modern Switzerland.  相似文献   

14.
A review and analysis of the rules and regulations including the tax aspects of making an investment in India is presented. The full range from Foreign Direct Investment to different forms of doing business with specific examples from the publishing industry is explored to help understand current policies and regulations.
Sandeep ChauflaEmail: Email:
  相似文献   

15.
The British civil administration of the Mandate (1920–1948) introduced the recordkeeping system used by British government. The main tool was the Central Registry. Filing was by series, each series including case files, correspondents’ files and subject files. After Independence, government agencies, courts and local authorities continued the recordkeeping systems and methods adopted during the Mandate period. Even today, many features of recordkeeping in Israel bear witness to their British origin.
Zohar AloufiEmail: Email:

Zohar Aloufi   has an MLS (Archives Studies) from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. She is currently Archivist at Tel-Aviv University Archives, in charge of Prof. Yuval Ne’eman Archives. Former positions were Superintendent of Records Management in the State Archives and Deputy Director of the Archives and Museum of the Jewish Labour Movement. She established the Haifa City Archives, and was Haifa City Archivist until retirement. Aloufi initiated and co-founded the Section of Municipal Archivists of the International Council on Archives. She is a now a member of ICA/ACOM. She is currently the President of Israel Archives Association. Aloufi has taught Records Management at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Graduate School of Library, Archives and Information Studies; at Emeq-Jezreel College, and at various other institutions and has consulted for a wide variety of projects and organizations  相似文献   

16.
This article describes the first half century of the Communist government’s supervision and management of the central-government archives of the last two dynasties. Immediately with the Communist ascent to power in 1949, the new government took great interest in assembling and protecting the country’s archival documents, readying the Ming-Qing archives for access to scholars, and preparing for publication of selected materials. By the 1980s Beijing’s Number One Historical Archives, in charge of the largest holding of Ming-Qing documents, had become the first Chinese authority to complete a full sorting and preliminary catalogues for such a collection. Moreover, to facilitate searches, an attempt has recently begun to create a subject-heading system for these and other holdings in the country. In the first half century’s final decades, foreign researchers were admitted for the first time and tours and international exchanges began to take place.
Beatrice S. BartlettEmail:
  相似文献   

17.
18.
This article critically analyses the views of a group of international experts on ISO 15489, the international records management standard, during the final phase of a project assessing its impact in the UK. It provides an overview of the entire research project and then focusses on the use of a modified Delphi study in gathering the views of experts. The Delphi technique is a research method not commonly used in records management and archival science research; relevant background to the technique is provided though the purpose of the article is not to provide a comprehensive review of it as a research method. A modified electronic version of the technique was used which was qualitative rather than quantitative and not focussed on the more usual consensus building. The article concludes that a Delphi study is a practical technique for conducting research which seeks to gather views from geographically dispersed participants in a timely, time-effective and convenient manner for all those involved. The use of a modified Delphi study proved to be extremely valuable in facilitating discussions of complex emergent issues about the role, value and nature of standards for records management, in particular ISO 15489, and about the future of ISO 15489, at a higher level of abstraction. The article makes a contribution in two areas: first in terms of the views of a group of leading international records management experts on the first international standard in records management; and second, in terms of the use of a research method which has previously been little used in the records management discipline.
Sue ChildsEmail:

Julie McLeod   is a Professor in Records Management in the School of Engineering, Computing and Information Sciences at Northumbria University, joining after a career in industry. She has worked on innovative work-based and distance learning training and education initiatives with the BBC, Deutsche Bank, The National Archives and the European Central Bank. A member of the BSI and ISO committees on records management standards work, she has conducted JISC and AHRC funded research in records management, has published widely and holds positions on the boards of several esteemed journals. In 2006 she became a member of the AHRC Peer Review Panel for Libraries, Museums and Archives and in 2007 was awarded a Personal Chair by Northumbria University. Sue Childs   is a Research Fellow within the Information Society Research and Consultancy Group at the School of Computing, Engineering and Information Sciences, Northumbria University. Her research interests include: records management; information society; health information; evidence-based practice particularly systematic reviews; user needs; ICT, information and critical/evaluative skills. She has worked on many research projects funded by a wide range of organisations. She has worked with Julie McLeod on records management projects funded by the AHRC and JISC; she also teaches on research methods courses. She edits the ‘Health Information on the Internet Journal’, published by the Royal Society of Medicine Press.  相似文献   

19.
20.
This article provides a summary of and commentary on ‘A Lovely Kind of Madness: Small and Independent Publishing in Australia’, an unpublished report by Kate Freeth, commissioned by the Small Press Underground Networking Community (SPUNC), the representative body for small and independent publishers in Australia, and released in November 2007. Freeth’s 14,000 word report constitutes the most detailed and comprehensive study of Australian small and independent publishing since the second volume of Michael Denholm’s Small Press Publishing in Australia (1991) and provides much primary material for policy makers, scholars, and people working in and around the publishing industry.
Nathan HollierEmail:
  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号