共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 139 毫秒
1.
2.
An Australian Research Council project, Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, brought together experts in recordkeeping, privacy, confidentiality, intellectual property, torts, medical law and ethics
to address concerns with a major networked Australian health record initiative. The research required developing innovative
research tools and understandings, which provides an exemplar for methodologies to address multiple-disciplinary concerns
and priorities that set a precedent for future inter-disciplinary collaborative projects concerned with the analysis and design
of such systems. This article provides an analysis of the research design, methods, tools and findings of the project which
operated within a records continuum framework.
Dr. Livia Iacovino is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow with the Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics in the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia, where she has taught the legal and ethical curricula in the recordkeeping courses. Her research and publications are focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of archival science, law and ethics, in particular ownership, access and privacy of electronic records. She has been a Chief Investigator for Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant and has collaborated internationally with the InterPARES Project and the International Records Management Trust. Barbara Reed has been involved with industry, teaching, research and standards setting, in the course of her 25 years in the recordkeeping and information management communities. She has been the Director of The Recordkeeping Institute since 2000 and has over 20 years consulting experience to all levels of government, private and public companies and not-for profit organisations. She has developed and negotiated Standards for recordkeeping at state, national and international levels. She has published widely on metadata definition and deployment, recordkeeping, interoperability, management of resources over time and digital preservation. She was a Research Associate in the Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, 2002–2005, and Clever Recordkeeping Metadata, 2005–2006, both ARC Projects. 相似文献
| Barbara ReedEmail: |
Dr. Livia Iacovino is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow with the Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics in the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia, where she has taught the legal and ethical curricula in the recordkeeping courses. Her research and publications are focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of archival science, law and ethics, in particular ownership, access and privacy of electronic records. She has been a Chief Investigator for Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant and has collaborated internationally with the InterPARES Project and the International Records Management Trust. Barbara Reed has been involved with industry, teaching, research and standards setting, in the course of her 25 years in the recordkeeping and information management communities. She has been the Director of The Recordkeeping Institute since 2000 and has over 20 years consulting experience to all levels of government, private and public companies and not-for profit organisations. She has developed and negotiated Standards for recordkeeping at state, national and international levels. She has published widely on metadata definition and deployment, recordkeeping, interoperability, management of resources over time and digital preservation. She was a Research Associate in the Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, 2002–2005, and Clever Recordkeeping Metadata, 2005–2006, both ARC Projects. 相似文献
3.
网络档案信息检索需要对检索途径和方法进行重新的思考与审视。元数据设计成为实现网络档案信息检索的前提。网络档案信息检索中元数据的具体设计可以参考现有的各类元数据标准,例如EAD标准,DA/T 46-2009《文书类电子文件元数据方案》,ISO 15489-1:redline:2016《信息与文献——文件管理——第1部分:概念与原则》。网络档案信息检索的元数据设计要能够实现对档案内容的有效检索,要记录完善的背景信息并能够针对其进行检索,要能够实现多级著录并应全面覆盖《档案著录规则》。 相似文献
4.
Joanna Sassoon 《Archival Science》2007,7(2):133-145
The emergence of the new format of electronic/digital records provides the opportunity for archivists to reconsider the presumed
format-neutrality of professional practice. As research in electronic records has served to re-emphasise, without an understanding
of the needs and forms of material, then the work of archivists can have a profound impact on the evidential value and long-term
research potential of the material. This paper attempts to broaden the debate about the requirements of all archival formats,
and to build a new regime of 21st-century format specialists.
Dr. Joanna Sassoon is currently seconded to Edith Cowan University as Senior Lecturer in the School of Computer and Information Science. Her permanent position is in the State Records Office of Western Australia. She has long experience in managing archival collections, and has written extensively on a range of topics including digitisation, the effect of institutional practice on archival materials, environmental and indigenous history, and photographs as archives, and her work has been recognised with two Mander-Jones awards from the Australian Society of Archivists. She holds a Ph.D. in history with distinction from the University of Western Australia. 相似文献
| Joanna SassoonEmail: |
Dr. Joanna Sassoon is currently seconded to Edith Cowan University as Senior Lecturer in the School of Computer and Information Science. Her permanent position is in the State Records Office of Western Australia. She has long experience in managing archival collections, and has written extensively on a range of topics including digitisation, the effect of institutional practice on archival materials, environmental and indigenous history, and photographs as archives, and her work has been recognised with two Mander-Jones awards from the Australian Society of Archivists. She holds a Ph.D. in history with distinction from the University of Western Australia. 相似文献
5.
Zohar Aloufi 《Archival Science》2007,7(3):207-211
The British civil administration of the Mandate (1920–1948) introduced the recordkeeping system used by British government.
The main tool was the Central Registry. Filing was by series, each series including case files, correspondents’ files and
subject files. After Independence, government agencies, courts and local authorities continued the recordkeeping systems and
methods adopted during the Mandate period. Even today, many features of recordkeeping in Israel bear witness to their British
origin.
Zohar Aloufi has an MLS (Archives Studies) from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. She is currently Archivist at Tel-Aviv University Archives, in charge of Prof. Yuval Ne’eman Archives. Former positions were Superintendent of Records Management in the State Archives and Deputy Director of the Archives and Museum of the Jewish Labour Movement. She established the Haifa City Archives, and was Haifa City Archivist until retirement. Aloufi initiated and co-founded the Section of Municipal Archivists of the International Council on Archives. She is a now a member of ICA/ACOM. She is currently the President of Israel Archives Association. Aloufi has taught Records Management at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Graduate School of Library, Archives and Information Studies; at Emeq-Jezreel College, and at various other institutions and has consulted for a wide variety of projects and organizations 相似文献
| Zohar AloufiEmail: Email: |
Zohar Aloufi has an MLS (Archives Studies) from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. She is currently Archivist at Tel-Aviv University Archives, in charge of Prof. Yuval Ne’eman Archives. Former positions were Superintendent of Records Management in the State Archives and Deputy Director of the Archives and Museum of the Jewish Labour Movement. She established the Haifa City Archives, and was Haifa City Archivist until retirement. Aloufi initiated and co-founded the Section of Municipal Archivists of the International Council on Archives. She is a now a member of ICA/ACOM. She is currently the President of Israel Archives Association. Aloufi has taught Records Management at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Graduate School of Library, Archives and Information Studies; at Emeq-Jezreel College, and at various other institutions and has consulted for a wide variety of projects and organizations 相似文献
6.
7.
论文从电子文件真实性权威性需求出发,对文件管理元数据保证电子文件真实性的途径进行了探讨,并提出了国家标准《文件管理元数据原则》对文件管理元数据所规定的总体结构,最后指出了国家标准《文件管理元数据原则》从文件管理元数据方面保证电子文件真实性的标准化作用与意义。 相似文献
8.
描述医学资源的元数据方案 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
介绍4种描述医学资源的元数据:OhioLINK的医学元数据、NLM Metadata Schema、Medi-cal Core Metadata(MCM)、CISMeF(Catalog and Index of French-language health resources)无数据,得出一般是通过元数据的复用来形成描述医学资源的元数据集的结论。 相似文献
9.
Astrid M. Eckert 《Archival Science》2007,7(3):223-244
The article examines the transition of (West) German archivists from the Nazi period to the time of Allied occupation and
on into the early years of the Federal Republic of Germany. After considering the extent of the profession’s nazification,
the article focuses on Allied denazification efforts after the war and discusses the strategies archivists devised in order
to maneuver through these dangerous times. In the end, the archival profession mastered the transition with only minor “denazification
damage.” The article closes with an examination of the consequences of the continuity of personnel especially among the leading
archivists of the former Prussian Archival Administration (Preussische Archivverwaltung) for the reconstruction of the archival
profession in West Germany.
Astrid M. Eckert is an Assistant Professor of Modern European History at Emory University in Atlanta. (M.A., University of Michigan, 1995; M.A. Free University Berlin, 1998; Dr. Phil. Free University Berlin, 2003). Before moving to Emory, she was a Research Fellow at the German Historical Institute (GHI) in Washington, D. C. (2002–2005). Her 2003 Dissertation on the history of captured German records after the Second World War was awarded the Friedrich Meinecke Dissertation Prize of Free University’s history department, and the biennial Hedwig Hintze Dissertation Award of the German Historical Association. The work was published in German in 2004 and will appear in English with Cambridge University Press as Fight for the Files: The Western Allies and the Captured German Archives after World War II. Her research interests include the history of postwar Germany, transnational historiographical questions, and, most recently, the political and cultural history of the inter-German border. 相似文献
| Astrid M. EckertEmail: |
Astrid M. Eckert is an Assistant Professor of Modern European History at Emory University in Atlanta. (M.A., University of Michigan, 1995; M.A. Free University Berlin, 1998; Dr. Phil. Free University Berlin, 2003). Before moving to Emory, she was a Research Fellow at the German Historical Institute (GHI) in Washington, D. C. (2002–2005). Her 2003 Dissertation on the history of captured German records after the Second World War was awarded the Friedrich Meinecke Dissertation Prize of Free University’s history department, and the biennial Hedwig Hintze Dissertation Award of the German Historical Association. The work was published in German in 2004 and will appear in English with Cambridge University Press as Fight for the Files: The Western Allies and the Captured German Archives after World War II. Her research interests include the history of postwar Germany, transnational historiographical questions, and, most recently, the political and cultural history of the inter-German border. 相似文献
10.
《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(56):147-160
Abstract The Center for Electronic Records of the National Archives is the unit of the National Archives and Records Administration responsible for the appraisal, accessioning, preservation, and provision of access to the permanently valuable electronic records of the Federal government. Recent changes in technology, especially the development of global networks of computers, have changed the way some archivists view the role of archives, especially for electronic records. From a reference services perspective, there is a continuing rqle for electronic records archives. 相似文献
11.
论文对国家标准《文件管理元数据原则》中文件管理元数据的结构化信息与半结构化信息的定义、由来及其如何理解进行了探讨,并对作为典型的结构化信息的《都柏林核心元数据集》进行了辨析,同时,对文件管理元数据的半结构化信息进行了辨析,最后指出了文件管理元数据的结构化信息与半结构化信息的意义所在. 相似文献
12.
This article is a general introduction into the special issue of Archival Science on “archiving research data”. It summarizes
the different contributions and gives an overview of the main issues in this special field of archiving. One of the leading
questions is how and why research data archives differ from public record offices. In the past, the developments in these
two worlds have been rather separate. There are however signs that they are converging in the digital world. In particular,
this can be seen in the areas of metadata and Internet dissemination as these are strongly influenced by the rapid changes
in information technology. These changes have also led to important new developments in the infrastructure of research data
to which special attention is paid. New concepts such as collaboratories, data curation, Open Access and the Open Archives
Initiative are discussed.
相似文献
| Heiko TjalsmaEmail: |
13.
There is a need for systemic improvement in the management of care records in Australia. This has been highlighted by government inquiries, media coverage and research literature relating to the significance of records for those who experience out-of-home care. The Who Am I? project – an interdisciplinary collaboration between historians, social workers and archivists – sought to address this concern and support positive change in 12 participating community service organisations (CSOs) in Victoria. To provide a framework for practice improvement, research archivists on the Who Am I? team designed the Self-Assessment Tool for Archives. Based on an action research methodology and influenced by the Records Continuum, this was an ‘educative intervention’ for the CSOs, as well as the participating archivists. 相似文献
14.
Edward M. Corrado 《International Information and Library Review》2018,50(1):47-53
Discovery products promise to offer library patrons one-stop shopping for library resources. In order to accomplish this, they harvest metadata from various library databases and repositories such as integrated library systems, institutional repositories, and digital libraries. Discovery products then index this metadata along with the metadata for resources from the discovery service into a single product for search. The most common method used to harvest local metadata is the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). This column first looks at discovery, then it describes OAI-PMH and some of the issues involved with effectively harvesting library metadata. 相似文献
15.
Jennifer S. Milligan 《Archival Science》2007,7(4):359-367
Curious Archives examines the creation of the museum of archives, the Musée de l’Histoire de France, at the Imperial Archives
of France under the direction of Leon de Laborde, 1858–1867. This museum was intended as a crucial tool for publicizing the
Archives and educating the public, but also represented a break from the Archives’ role as administrative storehouse both
in practice and in the popular imagination. The museum’s conception and reception reveal conflicts around the Archives’ mission
and contents, particularly regarding public interest, the potential dangers of public curiosity, and nature of documentary
and historical knowledge in nineteenth-century France.
相似文献
| Jennifer S. MilliganEmail: |
16.
OAIS参考模型与中文元数据方案 总被引：12，自引：2，他引：10
介绍了OAIS参考模型的概念与框架，分析其对数字资源的长期保存功能。中文元数据方案的设计基于OAIS参考模型，包括了描述性、管理性、技术性和法律性信息，用户可以在这几个方面对中文数字信息进行语义级访问。 相似文献
17.
18.
This article critically analyses the views of a group of international experts on ISO 15489, the international records management
standard, during the final phase of a project assessing its impact in the UK. It provides an overview of the entire research
project and then focusses on the use of a modified Delphi study in gathering the views of experts. The Delphi technique is
a research method not commonly used in records management and archival science research; relevant background to the technique
is provided though the purpose of the article is not to provide a comprehensive review of it as a research method. A modified
electronic version of the technique was used which was qualitative rather than quantitative and not focussed on the more usual
consensus building. The article concludes that a Delphi study is a practical technique for conducting research which seeks
to gather views from geographically dispersed participants in a timely, time-effective and convenient manner for all those
involved. The use of a modified Delphi study proved to be extremely valuable in facilitating discussions of complex emergent
issues about the role, value and nature of standards for records management, in particular ISO 15489, and about the future
of ISO 15489, at a higher level of abstraction. The article makes a contribution in two areas: first in terms of the views
of a group of leading international records management experts on the first international standard in records management;
and second, in terms of the use of a research method which has previously been little used in the records management discipline.
Julie McLeod is a Professor in Records Management in the School of Engineering, Computing and Information Sciences at Northumbria University, joining after a career in industry. She has worked on innovative work-based and distance learning training and education initiatives with the BBC, Deutsche Bank, The National Archives and the European Central Bank. A member of the BSI and ISO committees on records management standards work, she has conducted JISC and AHRC funded research in records management, has published widely and holds positions on the boards of several esteemed journals. In 2006 she became a member of the AHRC Peer Review Panel for Libraries, Museums and Archives and in 2007 was awarded a Personal Chair by Northumbria University. Sue Childs is a Research Fellow within the Information Society Research and Consultancy Group at the School of Computing, Engineering and Information Sciences, Northumbria University. Her research interests include: records management; information society; health information; evidence-based practice particularly systematic reviews; user needs; ICT, information and critical/evaluative skills. She has worked on many research projects funded by a wide range of organisations. She has worked with Julie McLeod on records management projects funded by the AHRC and JISC; she also teaches on research methods courses. She edits the ‘Health Information on the Internet Journal’, published by the Royal Society of Medicine Press. 相似文献
| Sue ChildsEmail: |
Julie McLeod is a Professor in Records Management in the School of Engineering, Computing and Information Sciences at Northumbria University, joining after a career in industry. She has worked on innovative work-based and distance learning training and education initiatives with the BBC, Deutsche Bank, The National Archives and the European Central Bank. A member of the BSI and ISO committees on records management standards work, she has conducted JISC and AHRC funded research in records management, has published widely and holds positions on the boards of several esteemed journals. In 2006 she became a member of the AHRC Peer Review Panel for Libraries, Museums and Archives and in 2007 was awarded a Personal Chair by Northumbria University. Sue Childs is a Research Fellow within the Information Society Research and Consultancy Group at the School of Computing, Engineering and Information Sciences, Northumbria University. Her research interests include: records management; information society; health information; evidence-based practice particularly systematic reviews; user needs; ICT, information and critical/evaluative skills. She has worked on many research projects funded by a wide range of organisations. She has worked with Julie McLeod on records management projects funded by the AHRC and JISC; she also teaches on research methods courses. She edits the ‘Health Information on the Internet Journal’, published by the Royal Society of Medicine Press. 相似文献
19.
电子档案元数据方案设计与应用初探 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
《ISO23081信息与文献—文件管理过程—文件元数据》发布以来,我国的本土化研究应用、采标制标等工作均取得明显进展,使得以元数据集作为电子档案管理系统数据模型成为必然。文章以江西省档案馆电子档案接收管理系统(以下简称JXDAERIMS)为实例,探讨、分析电子档案元数据方案的扩展设计与应用。 相似文献
20.
Tim Schlak 《Archival Science》2008,8(2):85-101
This article pursues the varying understandings of the photograph in archival literature. An in-depth review of the scholarship
uncovers several possible reasons why archivists and those writing about photographic archives apparently continue to struggle
with the photograph, including: the sheer difficulty that photographs as an elusive medium present; past debates about photography
in art history, history, and archival literature; and the challenges that the photograph as an evasive document presents to
the contradictory nature of archives themselves and to conceptions of archival science. Having evolved from an understanding
of photographs that conflated content with meaning to postmodernist notions of contingent and plural meanings in which photographs
participate, archival writings on the photograph hold promise as they begin to tread the waters that Schwartz charted in the
last 15 years. This paper follows that historical progression in order to trace the discourse on photographic archives that
has emerged over the past three decades.
相似文献
| Tim SchlakEmail: |