共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 278 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
陈玉梅 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014,53(6)
正在新的形势下,面对新文化建设的繁重任务和网络化、信息化社会的发展,综合性人文社科学术期刊如何保持自身特色,实现转型升级,为社会科学进步、文化传承与传播做出贡献,是期刊界面临的共同问题。一、《社会科学战线》的特色建设综合性学术期刊发挥优势,加强刊物特色建设,关键是创新。只有充分利用综合性刊物不同学科的学术资源,组织充分渗入的跨学科对话,才能以边缘冲击、跨界交流来推动文化创新。基于此, 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
陈洪捷 《北京大学教育评论》2011,9(2):1-9
本文对通行的人文社会科学学科体系的概念与内涵进行了讨论,提出了人文社会科学学平面体系和立体体系的概念,认为立体体系是建设具有中国特色的人文社会科学体系的关键所在,并从国际比较的角度,把中国特色与中国优势联系起来,指出建设具有中国特色的人文社会科学体系的核心在于形成中国人文社会科学的优势,没有优势,则无特色可言。 相似文献
8.
石新中 《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2004,1(6):119-122
当前 ,中国人文社会科学研究中存在着严重的学科分割现象 ,这已严重地阻碍了我国人文社会科学研究的进一步发展。学科的分割与近代以来人们的分析方式有关 ,然而时代的发展要求人文社会科学各学科之间实现沟通和融合。在促进人文社会科学各学科之间的沟通和融合的过程中 ,综合性社科期刊可以发挥其独特的作用。 相似文献
9.
人文社会科学基础课程是小学教师进修高等师范专科小学教育专业必修的综合基础课程,4学分,72学时,其中IP课件6学时。 本课程的要求是:了解人文社会科学的基础知识;了解人文社会科学在物质文明和精神文明建设中的地位和作用,现代人文社会科学的若干主干学科的发展概貌和总体发展趋势,以及人文社会科学发展与初等教育改革的关系;理解人文社会科学与自然科学的区别和联系,初步确立完整的现代科学文化概念;学习运用人文社会科学的知识、观点、方法分析现实社会问题和教育问题,提高初等教育中理科文科互补互渗、开展综合性教育的理性认识和 相似文献
10.
理工科高校的人文社会科学的基础相对较为薄弱,如何借助理工科优势进行人文社会科学的学科交叉、发展人文社会科学成为一个亟待解决的问题。文章基于组织模式的维度和特征构建D-F模型,采用调查研究法、内容分析法分析麻省理工学院、斯坦福大学和上海交通大学人文社会科学的学科交叉的组织模式,提出思考与建议,以期对理工科高校构建特色鲜明、文理交叉的学科体系并推动人文社会科学的发展提供思路与模式借鉴。 相似文献
11.
赵锋 《襄樊职业技术学院学报》2011,10(5):58-60,69
文章通过分析教育部社科司2008年的统计数据,发现我省人文社科研究人员人均成果、地方高校人文社科成果与研究发展人数、人文社科在研项目和成果应用率、地方高校投入人文社科研发经费等方面与全国其他地方相比都存在不小的差距,与我省的经济地位、发展定位都不相适应,相应提出了一些思考和建议。 相似文献
12.
改革开放后清华大学确定了综合性大学的发展目标,逐步恢复和增设了若干人文社科院系,使人文社会科学获得了全面发展。本文主要以人文社会科学学院为代表,对这一时期清华大学人文社会科学的历史沿革进行了系统论述,并深入分析其发展动因、成就及局限。该研究对于总结改革开放以来清华大学人文社会科学的发展经验,正确认识其历史地位以及制定今后的发展方向等具有一定的参考价值。 相似文献
13.
14.
Robert Hanson 《Higher Education》1994,28(1):109-117
The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) is the principal source of funds for university-based research and scholarship in the social sciences and the humanities in Canada. Hence, its funding practices have a significant impact on what research is conducted and how that research is performed. At the same time, high levels of demand for research funding in the face of a limited budget accentuate the need to ensure the best use of funds available. Consequently, the SSHRC pursues a range of evaluation activities ranging from the peer-based adjudication of grant requests for operational purposes, to program evaluations for strategic purposes.The opinions and views express herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 相似文献
15.
Dr. W. B. Toole Jr. 《Innovative Higher Education》1981,6(1):19-29
The School of Humanities and Social Sciences at North Carolina State University has been presenting noncredit humanities seminars to diverse adult audiences throughout the state since January 1978. The purpose of the program has been to bring small groups of people with college-level intelligence together to discuss humanistic issues in a format that reflects, to some extent, the intellectual background and discipline of a university. The success of the seminars, which involve personal and videotaped presentations by university humanists, has been due primarily to the quality of the faculty involved and the resources of the Cooperative Extension Service. Though this program is best suited for land-grant universities, its basic format could be adapted in various ways to other institutional settings. 相似文献
16.
美国高校人文社会科学的演变及其启示 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
张红霞 《清华大学教育研究》2003,24(1):49-54
本文通过对美国高校人文社会科学在学科性质、社会功能及高校课程演化过程的分析，揭示出美国的人文学科在经历了18世纪末到20世纪中叶的衰退后，在20世纪80年代经历了艰难而有成效的调整和重组，目前正以积极的姿态，通过与科学等其它学科的合作、通过贴近社会和学生需求，走向新的历程。相比于西方一些具有科学理性文化传统的国家而言，我国人文与社会科学的改革将面临更大的困难。人文与社会科学的现代化将对未来多元化学术社会达成价值共识具有重要意义。 相似文献
17.
世界一流研究型大学中人文社会科学的作用及发展趋势 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
当今世界一流研究型大学的办学理念和学科门类均具有文理结合、学科齐全的显著特点。人文社会科学的地位与作用越来越重要。未来人文社会科学在研究方法、研究领域、概念理论等方面均有新的发展趋势,我国高校人文社会科学研究主题也应有所转变。 相似文献
18.
Theda Thomas Joy Wallace Pamela Allen Jennifer Clark Adrian Jones Jill Lawrence 《International Journal for Academic Development》2017,22(2):120-133
The introduction of discipline standards in Australia has required a comprehensive rethinking of humanities and social science curricula from first year through to graduation. This paper proposes a model to facilitate academics’ engagement with discipline standards and their implication for first-year curricula. The model supports discipline-focussed professional development that integrates consideration of discipline threshold learning outcomes, first-year pedagogy principles, and discipline threshold concepts. The model is demonstrated using strategies that were applied, tested, and shown to be effective in workshops across five disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. 相似文献
19.
由于历史原因,我国高校中人文教育薄弱,大学生人文素质缺失.积极开展高校人文素质教育是我国培养现代人才、创建和谐小康社会迫切需要开展的工作.文章提出在高校开展人文素质教育,培养文理兼备的综合型人才,是我国社会生产力发展的必然要求,是历史的必然选择,也是大学教师必须面对和完成的历史使命. 相似文献
20.
The increasing importance of the competition in global university ranking has resulted in a paradigm shift in academic governance in East Asia. Many governments have introduced different strategies for benchmarking their leading universities to facilitate global competitiveness and international visibility. A major trend in the changing university governance is the emergence of a regulatory evaluation scheme for faculty research productivity, reflected by the striking features of the recent changing academic profile of publication norms and forms that go beyond the territories of nation-states in the East and West. With the expansion of the Taiwanese higher education system in the last two decades, the maintenance of quality to meet the requirements for international competitiveness has become a key concern for policy makers. Since 2005, the Ministry of Education has introduced a series of university governance policies to enhance academic excellence in universities and established a formal university evaluation policy to improve the competitiveness and international visibility of Taiwanese universities. In so doing, the government has legalized a clear link between evaluation results and public funding allocation. Research performance is assessed in terms of the number of articles published in journals indexed by the Science Citation Index (SCI), the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), and the Arts and Humanities Citation Index and in terms of citation rates and associated factors. Therefore, evaluation has taken on a highly quantitative dimension. Despite the efforts of concerned parties to encourage academic excellence, the abovementioned quantitative evaluation indicators have resulted in bitter complaints from the humanities and social sciences, whose research accomplishments are devalued and ignored by the current quantitative indicators. In this paper, the authors describe the recent petition for collective action initiated by university faculty to protest the privileging of SSCI and SCI publications as critical indicators for academic performance regardless of faculty discipline and specialization. The article concludes its argument with a group petition calling for more diverse and reliable indicators in recognizing the research of different natures and disciplines while creating culturally responsive evaluation criteria for social sciences and humanities in the Taiwanese academe. The article not only sheds light on academic evaluation literature, especially on the uncertain paradox of globalization and market economy, but also proposes alternatives to the evaluation system for humanities and social sciences in higher education. 相似文献