共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
"教育行动研究"(Education Action Research)是近二十年来国内外教育领域中逐渐兴起的一种研究方式。它倡导理论与实践、教学与科研有机地结合并相互促进。如何在教学中,更迅速、有效地解决和改进教育教学中所出现的问题,实现教师自身从经验型到反思型教师的超越,是当今教育界讨论的热门话题。"教育行动研究"在教学理论(研究)与教学实践(行动)之间架起了一座桥梁。本文从探讨教育行动研究的目的及特点,论证了教师专业发展的必需性和途径——教育行动研究。开展教育行动研究使教师具备了"实践者"与"研究者"的双重角色,同时也达到教师自身素质的提高。 相似文献
2.
张乐 《西北成人教育学报》2011,(3):59-61
"教学案例研究法"为解决教育理论与实践两者研究相互脱节搭起了一座桥梁,对教师解决科学与科研共进的两难问题提供了途径。教师运用"教学案例研究法"可以从搜集资料阶段、案例分析、案例加工、整理阶段三个阶段展开。 相似文献
3.
走向教育案例研究——兼论新一轮课程改革实验区的教育科研 总被引：17，自引：0，他引：17
案例研究与具体的教育教学工作相结合,工作、教学与研究一体化,着眼于解决教育教学过程中出现的真实的问题,强调实践与反思,强调合作与分享,最终目标是调整与改进教师的教育教学行为,增加教师的实践智慧;案例研究是开放的,允许研究者从各个侧面对案例作多元解读;案例研究是有限制的,不能指望通过案例研究就能解决所有问题,更不能不顾特定的历史条件、背景而把有限制的对案例的认识和解读推而广之,无限扩大;新一轮课程改革实验区的教育科研应该兼顾好实践性、创造性和指引性,在行动研究的基础上走向案例研究。 相似文献
4.
正新课程标准的实施,带来了教育观念、教学策略、教学方式、教学方法和教学手段等一系列的变革,要求教师要重新认识并定位自己的角色。因此,教师要树立新的教育观念,适应新课改的要求,在教学的各个环节中积极转变角色,构建高效课堂。下面谈谈我对新课程标准下教师角色转变的认识。一、在教学准备过程中转变角色新课程标准要求教师用先进的教育观念来指导自己的教学实践,用研究者的眼光分析在教学中出现的问题。要求教师不能只停留在"教"的层面上,而应该转变角色使自己由单纯的"教书匠"转变为教学的"研究者"。因此,教师对教材的研究是必不可少 相似文献
5.
彭波 《北京教育(高教版)》2012,(10)
正北京市西城区是全国基础教育先进区,其教育科研为区域的基础教育发展提供了持续动力与保障,使西城区的教育教学质量一直走在北京市的前列,在第三届"北京市教育教学成果奖"评选中,西城区共20项成果获奖,其中一等奖6项。在新的历史背景下,西城区提出实现基础教育均衡、内涵发展,为社会提供更优质的教育,这赋予了教育科研更重要的责任与使命:转变教育观念,改进教育教学;促进教师、校长专业发展;发展学校特色。中小学的教育科研是基于教育教学实践的行动研究,其重点是认识教育对象,改进教育行为。因此,研究的选 相似文献
6.
浅析教师角色转变的主要途径 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
实施新课程,是一场重大的教育改革,它呼唤教师的角色转变。具体而言,就是：在教师与学生关系上,使教师成为学生学习的促进者;在教学与研究的关系上,使教师成为教育教学的研究者;在教学与课程的关系上,使教师成为课程的实施者和开发者;在学校与社会的关系上,使教师成为社区型的开放的教师。 相似文献
7.
<证券投资学>是高职院校经济类专业的一门重要基础课,理论性与应用性较强,在该门课程教学中采用案例教学具有重要意义;教师在案例教学实施过程中,要重点把握"案例准备、案例分析与讨论、案例总结评述、撰写案例分析报告"等四个环节;教师要处理好案例教学与其它教学手段的关系,要注意由传授者到引导者的角色转变,采用多媒体辅助教学手段提高案例教学效果;建议高职院校加强案例教学管理,以保障案例教学的实施. 相似文献
8.
《大连教育学院学报》2011,27(4):93-F0003
教师如何成为研究者？如何从“知识的传授者”“课程执行者”转变为融教学、管理、研究于一体的综合性角色,使自身的教育教学更具科学性和艺术性？大连市沙河口区在教师的教育科研能力提高上下了很大的功夫。“十一五”期间,在以校为单位的集体科研课题研究的基础上开展了“教师个人小课题”的研究,力图促进教师专业成长,使教育科研满足教师教育教学工作的需要。 相似文献
9.
视频案例研究是一种新型的“研修平台”,对于捕获课堂教学行为、解决当前课改问题、提供观察反思平台、转变研究方式,提高教师专业水平有着重要的现实意义,为教师专业成长带来了新的发展空间。本文通过案例,阐述了视频案例研究在提高教师专业水平、优化音乐教学行为方面的作用与现实意义。 相似文献
10.
11.
This paper sets out to review the on-going case study debate. We do not aim to enter the qualitative/quantitative discussion, nor do we suggest that the case study is the ultimate or only form of research. We suggest that case studies should be used in conjunction with other forms of research. What is important is that the techniques selected are appropriate for any proposed research undertaking so that quantitative and qualitative strategies can meaningfully co-exist within the same research project.
We do, however, suggest that in certain sectors the case study approach is misunderstood and under-utilized. The focus of the paper is an objective discussion of a number of issues which have been raised about the case study strategy. The discussion does not assume that there is ‘one type’ of case study, rather it refers to the multitude of case study approaches which can be classified under the case study label.
In addition to a review of the case study debate and some research strategies associated with the approach, the paper discusses a number of pertinent issues which continue to generate much debate. The issues of procedure, a multi-method strategy, objectivity, generalizability and presentation are reviewed in relation to case study research.
The case study approach has weaknesses, and its share of critics, but has become an established and respected form of research. Issues involved in case study research still need to be considered as it becomes more accepted as a viable and insightful form of research. 相似文献
12.
喻红 《绵阳师范学院学报》2011,30(10):139-142
教师"课堂决策"是其"课程决策"在课堂教学层面上的体现。研究教师课堂决策对研究其课程决策的特征,以及影响其课程决策形成和发展的因素及条件有着重要的意义。在我国,由于课堂教学所涉及的因素极其复杂,将实证研究方法运用于教师"课堂决策"研究仍属空白。本文通过对实证研究案例的分析,探讨了两种质的实证研究方法,即"多例个案研究"和"质的内容分析"在外语教师课堂决策实证研究领域中的可行性及意义。 相似文献
13.
Helen Simons 《Cambridge Journal of Education》1996,26(2):225-240
One of the advantages cited for case study research is its uniqueness, its capacity for understanding complexity in particular contexts. A corresponding disadvantage often cited is the difficulty of generalising from the single case. Such an observation assumes a polarity and stems from a particular view of research. Looked at differently, from within a holistic perspective and direct perception, there is no disjunction. What we have is a paradox, which if acknowledged and explored in depth, yields both unique and universal understanding. This paper revisits this problem in case study research. It argues that, with the pressure for quantification and the growth of multi‐site case study design in policy research, the original vision and utility of case study for understanding complex educational phenomena has been clouded and thereby an opportunity diminished for new ways of knowing 相似文献
14.
This article examines the ethnographic case study in education in the context of policy making with particular emphasis on the practice of research and policy making. The central claim of the article is that it is impossible to establish a transcendental epistemology of the case study on instrumental rationality. Instead it argues for the notion of situated judgement that needs to be made by practitioners in context, practitioners being both researchers and policy makers. In other words, questions about the level of confidence or warrant that can be placed in different sorts of research evidence and findings cannot be answered independently of forming a view about the appropriateness of the policy culture that shapes political decision‐making. The article draws a distinction between the general, which is internal to the data as construed by a particular discipline, and the universal, which is the result of embedded human deliberation. This applies to all research findings and not only to case study, although since case study has long had to defend itself against accusations of the lack of generality, it can be a useful starting point for the discussion. This article is not meant to be yet another defence of the case study research genre, although a summary of other defences is offered. Rather it focuses on how use of the case study points to the limits of epistemology as rationality and offers a view of epistemology as ethics. 相似文献
15.
Daniel M. Maggin Bryan G. Cook Lysandra Cook 《Learning disabilities research & practice》2019,34(3):124-132
Single‐case research methods provide a basis for demonstrating that an intervention produces a reliable change in a targeted outcome for individual cases. To supplement visual analysis of data in single‐case studies, researchers frequently report statistics—often referred to as effect sizes—to summarize study findings. The recent proliferation of effect sizes used in single‐case research can be confusing. In this article, after reviewing single‐case research, we provide an overview of common types of effect sizes used in single‐case research, including overlap metrics and within‐ and between‐participant effect sizes, and conclude with examples of these effect sizes in the single‐case literature. Our take‐home message is that effect sizes are useful complements to visual analysis when interpreting results of single‐case design research studies. 相似文献
16.
When developing case studies within a longitudinal study of special educational needs provision within the Republic of Ireland, the authors were conscious of the critiques of the use of this approach within educational research. The difficulties associated with generalisation, challenges of ensuring trustworthiness and the possibilities of researcher bias have been identified as limiting factors in the presentation of case study data. In order to confront these limitations, the researchers developed a framework for case study development that aimed to provide a secure database and trustworthy interpretation in order to make assertions in relation to special educational needs provision. This paper describes this process and suggests that the need to develop safeguards in order to present case studies that have high degree of credibility is essential when using this approach. Furthermore, the transparency of research methods, a significant omission in many reports of research, is necessary in order to demonstrate the trustworthiness of data. 相似文献
17.
18.
Marie Parker-Jenkins 《Ethnography and Education》2018,13(1):18-33
This paper was prompted by the question, what do we mean by conducting ‘ethnography’? Is it in fact ‘case study’ drawing on ethnographic techniques? My contention is that in many cases, researchers are not actually conducting ethnography as understood within a traditional sense but rather are engaging in case study, drawing on ethnographic techniques. Does that matter you might ask? Well it determines what we can expect to discover from a research project in terms of results and the unearthing of deeper complexities. I frame the discussion around a set of closely related issues, namely ethnography, case study and researcher positioning, drawing on ethnographic techniques and fieldwork relations. The original contribution of the piece and overall argument is that research can represent a hybrid form, and based on my own research experience, I propose a new term ‘ethno-case study’ that has advantages of both ethnography and case study. 相似文献
19.
试说教师的案例研究 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
张肇丰 《课程.教材.教法》2004,(8)
教师的案例研究,是教师以叙事为主要方式来反思和改进自身教育教学实践的行动研究。教师案例研究具有主体性、情境性、倾向性、内驱性等特点。针对教师工作特点和研究思路的差异,案例研究有不同的类型。教师的案例研究是一个追求实践性知识的过程。 相似文献
20.
Mary Ann Coughlin Joseph Hoey Marsha Hirano-Nakanishi 《Asia Pacific Education Review》2009,10(1):69-81
The intent of the authors in preparing this paper is to compare and contrast the roles of Institutional Research in informing
decision making and governance in higher education. Using a case study format the authors will provide an example of a research
project conducted within each of the following sectors of United States higher education system: private 4-year not for profit,
public major research institutions/private specialized institutions, and a pubic state university system. The first case study
from the private sector will feature a mixed methodology study that used data from the National Survey of Student Engagement
(NSSE) and student focus groups to explore student engagement at this institution and inform faculty development. The second
case study will compare the use of data for decision making from the standpoint of large public research institutions and
private specialized institutions. The third case study from a state university system focuses on recent initiatives in the
public sector
to inform the public, the institutions, the State, and the federal government using data from institutional research offices,
student engagement surveys, and student learning assessments shared through consortia and national associations. These examples
will be discussed within the structure of decision making and governance in higher education. 相似文献