共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
This article indicates something of the enormous influence of constructivism on contemporary science education. The article distinguishes educational constructivism (that has its origins in theories of children's learning), from constructivism in the philosophy of science (usually associated with instrumentalist views of scientific theory), and from constructivism in the sociology of science (of which the Edinburgh Strong Programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge is the best known example). It notes the expansion of educational constructivism from initial considerations of how children come to learn, to views about epistemology, educational theory, ethics, and the cognitive claims of science. From the learning-theory beginnings of constructivism, and at each stage of its growth, philosophical questions arise that deserve the attention of educators. Among other things, the article identifies some theoretical problems concerning constructivist teaching of the content of science. 相似文献
2.
建构主义对科学教育理论的贡献与局限 总被引：33，自引：0，他引：33
建构主义在教育上的贡献主要在于在教育思想上进一步强调了认知主体的主动性 ,在科学教育上指出了科学知识学习的困难性。但激进的建构主义认识论和方法论在根本上有悖于科学理性 ,将认知主体的主动性和科学学习的困难性夸大为科学知识不可传授 ,这给教育研究和实践带来了混乱。在我国进行科学教育理论探索和实践的过程中 ,在应用建构主义原理发展学生的自主性的同时 ,应注意防止激进的建构主义的负面影响 相似文献
3.
建构主义教育活动的系统分析与哲学思考 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
建构主义的出现给教育领域注入新的活力，但基于对其发展沿革和现实的思考，建构主义教育理论正陷入一种认识和行为上的误区。本文通过对建构主义教育思想的哲学思考和建构主义教育活动的系统分析认识到：外部建构是社会建构主义教育活动的基石，而情意建构是外部建构的重点，是通向认知结构完善的桥梁。 相似文献
4.
Genevieve Marie Johnson 《Interactive Learning Environments》2013,21(3):298-308
In educational discourse on human learning (i.e. the result of experience) and development (i.e. the result of maturation), there are three fundamental theoretical frameworks, – behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism, each of which have been applied, with varying degrees of success, in online environments. An ecological framework of human learning and development in interactive learning environments is proposed. Such an inclusive paradigm organizes the fundamental theoretical assumptions of behaviourism (i.e. automated learning), cognitivism (i.e. recall, understanding, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, creativity, problem solving) and constructivism (i.e. private and shared meaning). Based on review of the literature, behaviourism is best conceptualized as a learning theory; constructivist theoretical assumptions are best applied to cognitive development including private online experience (cognitive constructivism) and shared online experience (social constructivism). Cognitivism is a particularly relevant theoretical orientation in understanding both human learning and development in interactive learning environments. 相似文献
5.
Paul Adams 《Education 3-13》2013,41(3):243-257
In the drive to improve standards, the collection and dissemination of numerical data still directs much contemporary educational policy. However, recent publications and debates seemingly attempt to reorient discussion from performance to learning. In support, constructivism is often referenced as a contributor in this endeavour. However, constructivism is not a single unified theory either of knowledge or pedagogy. This article identifies one version of constructivist thinking, social constructivism, both in terms of its underlying epistemology (theory of knowledge) and related pedagogy. Contemporary educational theories are then outlined to demonstrate that many practical solutions and theoretical ideas now presented as ‘good learning and teaching’ have much in common with social constructivist thinking. Finally, the article concludes by identifying two issues that require further discussion and debate if pedagogy of a social constructivist nature is to be considered. 相似文献
6.
“满怀激情地探究感兴趣的问题”——戴维·乔纳森博士访谈 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
戴维·乔纳森博士现为美国密苏里—哥伦比亚大学教育学院杰出教授。自 1976 年取得坦普尔大学教育媒体与教育心理学博士学位以来，乔纳森先后在世界上多所大学任教，例如美国的宾夕法尼亚州立大学、科罗拉多大学、北卡罗纳大学，荷兰的特温特大学，巴西的巴西利亚大学，新家坡的南洋理工大学，挪威的卑尔根大学等。乔纳森教授发表了 27 本专著以及大量的文章、论文，其研究领域涉及视觉文化、认知风格、教学设计、基于计算机的学习、超媒体、建构主义、建构主义学习环境以及认知工具等。最近编辑出版的专著有：《学习环境的理论基础》（2000）、《学会用技术解决问题：一个建构主义者的观点》（2003）、《教育传播与技术研究手册》（2004）和《学会解决问题：教学设计指南》（2004）。乔纳森博士当前的研究主要关注认知建模与认知任务分析、问题解决、建构主义学习环境设计、学习中认知工具的开发等。乔纳森教授的个人网站：http://www.coe.missouri.edu/~jonassen 相似文献
7.
《Journal of educational and psychological consultation》2013,23(1):105-112
Constructivism is a concept that in recent years has garnered considerable attention among science education researchers. Essentially, constructivism is a model of how learning takes place. Yager (1991, p. 53) called it a "most promising model" of learning. Yeany (1991, p. 1) alluded to a Kuhnian paradigm shift and suggested that constructivism may lead to a gelling of existing thought as well as the stimulation of new ideas. We do not believe this is hyperbole. In fact, we would add that the potential extends far beyond the bounds of science education (see e.g., Aderman & Russell, 1990). It seems to us that constructivist thought is applicable in any learning situation, including educational and psychological consultation. In this column, we first briefly describe constructivist thought as it has developed in the field of science education. Second, we suggest that constructivism can provide a promising conceptual framework for organizing research and practice in the various fields in which consultation is practiced. 相似文献
8.
Mary R. Sudzina 《Educational Psychology Review》1997,9(2):199-260
Recent interest and inquiry into constructivism, pedagogical content knowledge, and case study methodology are influencing the content and goals of educational psychology in teacher preparation. The reasons seem clear: The content of educational psychology lends itself to authentic, active, and pragmatic applications of theory to school practices, as well as to investigations of a variety of educational issues, perspectives, and contexts which can be viewed through case study, a constructivist problem-based approach to learning. Widely-used educational psychology texts are including constructivism as a cognitive alternative to behaviorist and information processing views of teaching and learning. Concurrently, case studies are being integrated in educational psychology texts, and a myriad of case texts have appeared with application to educational psychology courses. This article considers the decisions, benefits, and difficulties in teaching educational psychology through a constructivist case study approach. 相似文献
9.
Cognitive load theory,educational research,and instructional design: some food for thought 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Ton de Jong 《Instructional Science》2010,38(2):105-134
Cognitive load is a theoretical notion with an increasingly central role in the educational research literature. The basic
idea of cognitive load theory is that cognitive capacity in working memory is limited, so that if a learning task requires
too much capacity, learning will be hampered. The recommended remedy is to design instructional systems that optimize the
use of working memory capacity and avoid cognitive overload. Cognitive load theory has advanced educational research considerably
and has been used to explain a large set of experimental findings. This article sets out to explore the open questions and
the boundaries of cognitive load theory by identifying a number of problematic conceptual, methodological and application-related
issues. It concludes by presenting a research agenda for future studies of cognitive load. 相似文献
10.
侯立 《湖北第二师范学院学报》2012,(1):51-55
中国建构主义国际关系理论起步较晚,但是发展速度迅猛,成果丰富。中国建构主义研究可分为理论研究和应用研究两类。中国学者的理论研究比较侧重于建构主义的理论介绍、评价以及流派比较,应用研究更倾向于研究区域问题和大国关系。总体来说,我国建构主义的理论研究还不够深入,在其应用领域也未能更紧密地结合中国的现实问题,这也是未来中国建构主义国家关系理论发展的空间。 相似文献
11.
We can distinguish the claims of cognitive constructivism from those of metaphysical constructivism, which is almost entirely irrelevant to science education. Cognitive constructivism has strong empirical support and indicates important directions for changing science instruction. It implies that teachers need to be cognizant of representational, motivational and epistemic dimensions which can restrict or promote student learning. The resulting set of tasks for a science teacher are considerably larger and more complex than on the older more traditional conception, but the resources of cognitive sciences and the history of science can provide important parts of the teachers intellectual tool kit. A critical part of this conception of science education is that students must develop the skills to participate in epistemic interchanges. They must be provided opportunities and materials to develop those skills and the classroom community must have the appropriate features of an objective epistemic community. 相似文献
12.
An Alternative to Von Glasersfeld's Subjectivism in Science Education: Deweyan Social Constructivism
An influential view of constructivism in science and mathematics educational research and practice is that of Ernst von Glasersfeld. It is a peculiarly subjectivist form of constructivism that should not be attractive to science and mathematics educators concerned with retaining some sort of realism that leaves room for objectivity. The subjectivist constructivism of von Glasersfeld also becomes entangled in untenable mind/body and subject/object dualisms. Finally, these dualisms are unnecessary for social constructivism. I will provide one example of a social constructivist alternative to social constructivism, that of the pragmatic philosopher John Dewey. In presenting Dewey's position I will appeal to Ockham's razor, that is, the admonition not to multiply entities beyond necessity, to shave off the needless mentalistic and psychic entities that lead von Glasersfeld into his subjectivism and dualism. 相似文献
13.
论建构主义理论在高职教育的应用 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
郑海斌 《山东教育学院学报》2008,23(3):56-58
根据建构主义理论的基本观点,总结建构主义学习环境下的教学设计原则,探讨建构主义理论指导下的教学模式,并结合高职教育的实际,举例说明支架式教学、抛锚式教学、随机进入教学三种教学模式在高职教育中的应用。通过建构主义理论的指导,努力培养具有基础理论知识适度、解决问题能力强、职业素质高等特点的高职人才。 相似文献
14.
Barney Dalgarno 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2001,32(2):183-194
The changes that have occurred in accepted approaches to teaching and learning in recent years have been underpinned by shifts in psychological and pedagogical theory, culminating in moves towards a constructivist view of learning. This paper looks at the consequences of these theoretical shifts for Computer Assisted Learning (CAL).
Moshman has identified three interpretations of constructivism: endogenous constructivism which emphasises learner exploration, exogenous constructivism which recognises the role of direct instruction, but with an emphasis on learners actively constructing their own knowledge representations and dialectical constructivism which emphasises the role of interaction between learners, their peers and teachers. This classification scheme provides a framework for looking at the various constructivist approaches to CAL.
For example, constructivist CAL materials that draw on the endogenous view include hypermedia environments, simulations and microworlds. Materials that draw on the exogenous view include learner controlled tutorials, cognitive tools and practice modules. Lastly, materials that draw on the dialectical view include Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) tools and support (or scaffolding) tools. 相似文献
Moshman has identified three interpretations of constructivism: endogenous constructivism which emphasises learner exploration, exogenous constructivism which recognises the role of direct instruction, but with an emphasis on learners actively constructing their own knowledge representations and dialectical constructivism which emphasises the role of interaction between learners, their peers and teachers. This classification scheme provides a framework for looking at the various constructivist approaches to CAL.
For example, constructivist CAL materials that draw on the endogenous view include hypermedia environments, simulations and microworlds. Materials that draw on the exogenous view include learner controlled tutorials, cognitive tools and practice modules. Lastly, materials that draw on the dialectical view include Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) tools and support (or scaffolding) tools. 相似文献
15.
Constructivism and Science Education: A Further Appraisal 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
Michael R. Matthews 《Journal of Science Education and Technology》2002,11(2):121-134
This paper is critical of constructivism. It examines the philosophical underpinnings of the theory, it outlines the impact of the doctrine on contemporary science education, it details the relativist and subjectivist interpretation of Thomas Kuhn's work found in constructivist writings, it indicates the problems that constructivist theory places in the way of teaching the content of science, and finally it suggests that a lot of old-fashioned, perfectly reasonable educational truisms and concepts are needlessly cloaked in constructivist jargon that inhibites communication with educationalists and policy makers. 相似文献
16.
17.
运用建构主义指导英语课堂教学 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
桑晓丽 《桂林师范高等专科学校学报》2006,20(2):124-125
在研究儿童认知发展基础上产生的建构主义,不仅形成了全新的学习理论,也形成了全新的教学理论.以该理论为指导,把建构主义学习理论运用到英语课堂上,可以提高英语学习的绩效和质量. 相似文献
18.
Mansoor Niaz 《Interchange》2004,35(2):155-184
The objective of this study is to provide in-service teachers an opportunity to become familiar with the controversial nature
of progress in science (growth of knowledge) and its implications for research methodology in education. The study is based
on 41 participants who had registered for a nine-week course on Methodology of Investigation in Education, as part of their
Master’s degree program. The course is based on 20 readings drawing upon a history and philosophy of science perspective (positivism,
constructivism, Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos) and its implications for educational research. Course activities included written reports,
class room discussions based on participants’ presentations, and written exams. Based on the results obtained it was concluded
that: (a) participants were able to understand the basic ideas of constructivist philosophy and its pedagogical implications;
(b) the role of behavioural objectives in actual educational practice was questioned; (c) integration of qualitative and quantitative
research methods was considered to be an alternative to the current debate about the replacement of one method by the other;
(d) participants considered the dilemma of evaluating students based on what they have learned or what they should have learned,
within the social constructivist framework and generally favoured the former; and (e) most of the participants were reluctant
to accept constructivism as a form of positivism, a controversial thesis that is gaining support in the research literature.
Given the importance of alternative approaches to growth and meaning of knowledge, it is important that teachers be aware
of conflicting situations in the classroom that refer to: objectivity, scientific method, qualitative-quantitative methods,
relationship between method and problem, evaluation, and a critical appreciation of constructivism. 相似文献
19.
《学习科学杂志》2013,22(2):115-163
This article uses a critical evaluation of research on student misconceptions in science and mathematics to articulate a constructivist view of learning in which student conceptions play productive roles in the acquisition of expertise. We acknowledge and build on the empirical results of misconceptions research but question accompanying views of the character, origins, and growth of students' conceptions. Students have often been viewed as holding flawed ideas that are strongly held, that interfere with learning, and that instruction must confront and replace. We argue that this view overemphasizes the discontinuity between students and expert scientists and mathematicians, making the acquisition of expertise difficult to conceptualize. It also conflicts with the basic premise of constructivism: that students build more advanced knowledge from prior understandings. Using case analyses, we dispute some commonly cited dimensions of discontinuity and identify important continuities that were previously ignored or underemphasized. We highlight elements of knowledge that serve both novices and experts, albeit in different contexts and under different conditions. We provide an initial sketch of a constructivist theory of learning that interprets students' prior conceptions as resources for cognitive growth within a complex systems view of knowledge. This theoretical perspective aims to characterize the interrelationships among diverse knowledge elements rather than identify particular flawed conceptions; it emphasizes knowledge refinement and reorganization, rather than replacement, as primary metaphors for learning; and it provides a framework for understanding misconceptions as both flawed and productive. 相似文献
20.
Maria Kordaki 《Education and Information Technologies》2004,9(3):239-253
This study focuses on the development of prospective computer engineers' knowledge of educational software design through their involvement in a constructivist learning environment emphasizing project based learning. Within this environment prospective computer engineers (PCE) adopted a variety of roles namely: learners, teachers, users, designers, implementers and evaluators of educational software dealing with concepts of computer science while also taking into account theoretical educational considerations regarding constructivism and social views of knowledge construction. The analysis of the data shows that PCE frequently start by considering traditional behavioristic views regarding teaching and learning as well as regarding the design of educational software. The PCE progressed to accept more constructivist views regarding teaching and learning as well as to designing educational software by communicating their knowledge with their colleagues and the teacher in the project based context. PCE also progressed through the evaluation of the educational software using real classrooms. By exploiting the given feedback, PCE improved the quality of software specifications. 相似文献