共查询到17条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
李杼机 《广东教育学院学报》2014,(4):1-6
教学是大学的原生功能,是大学教师的主要职业活动。教学学术的提出拓展了学术的内涵,对大学教师的专业发展具有重要意义。教学学术既是大学教师专业发展的重要内容,也是大学教师专业发展的重要途径。教学学术视野下,要促进大学教师的专业发展,需要构建良好外部环境,重新认识教学与教学学术,健全大学教师专业发展的组织机构,完善大学教师培训制度,也需要注重教师个体自主发展,加强理论学习,反思教学实践,开展行动研究等。 相似文献
2.
3.
大学教师教学学术能力是大学的核心竞争力.教学学术能力是大学教师以学科认识论为基础,以人的发展为价值取向,通过开展教学学术研究活动以实现教学实践创新、知识改造扩展和有效传播的能力,其核心是掌握、运用和创新学科教学知识的能力.学科性是教学学术能力的本质内涵特征,实践旨趣是教学学术能力的最基础内涵特征,为人性是教学学术能力的... 相似文献
4.
刘赛尔 《当代教育理论与实践》2016,(12):109-111
大学教师在教学学术发展中占据主体位置,当前,教师教学责任意识不足、教师交往失衡、教学自主权受限等问题仍是制约大学教师教学学术发展的瓶颈。应通过建立教学问责机制、改善师生交往、放宽教学管理等措施逐步冲破瓶颈,促进大学教师教学学术发展。 相似文献
5.
教学学术厘清了教学与科研之间的关系,对大学教师专业发展具有重要意义。高校应从组织、制度、机制、文化等几方面入手,积极构建促进大学教师教学学术水平提升的良好环境。教师要不断加强学习,注重反思与合作,提高教学学术水平,以促进自身专业发展。 相似文献
6.
教学学术是学术的重要组成部分,大学教师的教学学术水平直接影响人才培养质量.以自编《大学教师教学学术水平影响因素调查问卷》为工具,运用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析对个案高校中影响教师教学学术水平的因素进行分析,影响大学教师教学学术水平主要是教育教学的反思、教育教学的合作与交流、教育教学的实践以及教育教学的自我评估四个因素.其中,教育教学的反思、教育教学的合作与交流是影响大学教师教学学术水平的关键因素.强化个人实践、培养教师反思能力、形成教师"学习共同体"、建立多样化的评价等可促进大学教师教学学术水平的提升. 相似文献
7.
杨婕 《广东教育学院学报》2008,28(2):63-67
大学教师专业发展是实现大学教师专业化的重要手段,而大学教师的专业发展有赖于良好的内在与外在环境,同时,大学教师专业发展的核心就是教学与科研的协调发展。而教学与科研并行发展的愿望和教学与科研不均衡发展的现实状况,要求我们应不断完善大学教师的科研与教学评价机制,而大学教师在关注教学质量的同时,也要充分意识到自己作为“学术人”的角色,提高自己的学术科研能力。 相似文献
8.
“教学学术”视角下大学教师教学责任意识的重建 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
由于大学教学没有被上升到“学术”的层面加以理解,教师的教学责任意识淡化。对此,博耶将“教学学术”纳人大学学术内涵之中,把大学教学也看作是一种学术活动。通过教师培训、教学观摩、指导教师以合理的归因方式理解教学责任等途径可帮助教师树立教学责任意识,提高教学学术水平。 相似文献
9.
数以万计的大学教师发展问题亟待解决,这也是当前提高高等教育质量和建设高等教育强国面临的艰巨任务。引入教学学术理论,从教学学术的视角研究大学教师发展将具有重要意义。教育者、研究者和学习者角色的统一融合体就应该是大学教师最核心和最重要的角色,这样的角色定位有利于大学教师的发展。好的教学还应意味着,教师既是学者又是学生,因此应该加强教师与学生之间的交流,形成一个师生学习共同体。教师与教师之间的学习共同体和教师与学生之间的学习共同体都可以促进大学教师的发展,大学教师的发展也都需要这些学习共同体的熏陶和培养。每位教师都必须坚持忠诚的最高标准,既要重视教师职业道德修养也要加强学术道德修养。 相似文献
10.
大学教师的教学能力与学术能力的融合为教学学术能力。教学学术能力具有教学属性与学术属性,学术属性是其本质,教学属性是其个性。教学学术能力可划分为知识维度、交流维度、反思维度和观念维度,每一维度都有其特殊内涵。以四维度划分为基础的教学学术能力评价,必须解决谁来评、何时评、评什么、怎样评和如何用等方面的问题,使大学教师教学学术能力得到科学的评价。 相似文献
11.
Peggy A. Pittas 《Innovative Higher Education》2000,25(2):97-110
This article offers the Lynchburg College Symposium Readings (LCSR) Program as a model for faculty development. The program encourages faculty collaboration, innovative classroom practices, and service as well as new areas of faculty scholarship. Methods for assessing faculty work within the context of the goals of the program and the institution are described. Throughout the history of the program an emphasis has been placed on continuous faculty development in the belief that keeping faculty vital ensures quality teaching and scholarship. 相似文献
12.
There is growing recognition of the complexity of academic work and the need for university and college faculty members to develop scholarly approaches to teaching and learning. While structured programs of study have been initiated for faculty to address these issues in various higher education contexts, very little research has investigated the theory–practice relationship of the scholarship of teaching and learning within a faculty certificate program context. This article presents a program development and evaluation framework to enhance the theory–practice integration of the scholarship of teaching and learning in such a program. Data suggest that a broad range of institutional and programmatic strategies can enhance the scholarship of teaching and learning in a faculty certificate program. A scholarly approach to teaching and learning is viewed as both an individual and social contextual process.Dr Harry Hubball and Dr Helen Burt are faculty members at the University of British Columbia, BC, Canada. Harry Hubball's research focuses on curriculum and pedagogy in university settings. He coordinates the UBC Faculty Certificate Program on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Helen Burt is the Associate Dean of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Her research interests include the development of novel polymer-based drug delivery systems. 相似文献
13.
14.
The scholarship of teaching and learning: A Special Niche for Faculty at Comprehensive Universities?
We investigated the involvement of faculty members at comprehensive universities in scholarship of teaching and learning publishing
activities in four disciplines. Compared to to their publishing rates in research-oriented journals, comprehensive university
faculty members were more involved in publishing articles and serving on editorial boards for pedagogical journals. Over the
past three decades, the relative involvement in the scholarship of teaching and learning journals by faculty members at comprehensive
universities and liberal arts colleges has increased whereas participation by faculty members at research universities has
declined. 相似文献
15.
论大学教师学术创新力基础内涵 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
大学教师在教育创新与创新型国家建设方面发挥着重要作用。大学教师创新力有其自身特定内涵,学术创新力是大学教师的核心创新力。学术创新力基础主要包括洞察想象能力、综合交叉能力、知识谱系能力、反思批判能力、学术自主能力、合作分享能力。 相似文献
16.
Carolin Kreber 《Innovative Higher Education》2002,27(1):5-23
The previous decade witnessed significant advancements in the scholarship of teaching at the levels of both theory building and program development. Notwithstanding these achievements, there remains considerable ambiguity regarding the meaning of the concept. This ambiguity has implications for faculty evaluation. Excellence in teaching, expertise in teaching, and the scholarship of teaching are analyzed according to the nature and sources of knowledge construction underlying each. Practical examples are included to illustrate differences. It is argued that excellence in teaching and the scholarship of teaching are both important but should be recognized and rewarded in their own right. 相似文献
17.
This study examines a college-teaching award that uses a scholarship of teaching model focusing on learning outcomes. Through questionnaires the researcher examined two groups’ perceptions: award recipients and academic leaders. Respondents described the award and indicated the perceived effect on faculty and programs. Both groups highlighted faculty incentive to innovate for promoting student learning, a strong impact on performance evaluation, and recognition of exceptional teaching. Respondents recommended better communicating the award’s rigor and learning focus to increase its impact. Recipients reported the award’s influence on continued innovation, engagement in teaching scholarship, and leadership opportunities. Over half have presented their work in peer-reviewed venues. 相似文献