共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 437 毫秒
1.
基于CCSS调查的南京某工科高校本科生四年的追踪数据,利用多层线性分析技术,构建了大学生教育收获的发展模型,探讨了影响大学生教育收获的因素。研究发现,第一,大学生教育收获发展中存在性别和城乡差异,但相对于学习投入指标和教育过程诊断指标,性别和城乡因素作用较小;第二,学习投入指标和教育过程诊断指标对教育收获及其变化均有显著正向作用,但作用程度不一,均可以解释教育总收获个体间截距变异的50%和斜率变异的30%以上,其中学业挑战度和向学/厌学指标对教育收获的作用最大,甚至可以解释斜率变异的75%以上;第三,学习投入指标和教育过程诊断指标对个体的知识收获、能力收获以及价值观收获及其变化也具有显著正向作用,作用程度也不一。基于此,本研究建议要善用学生个体特征因素的影响、强化学生教育过程因素的影响以及注重成熟理论的作用,以提高大学生的教育收获。 相似文献
2.
本研究使用NSSE-China问卷对H学院的大学生学习性投入状况进行调查,分析了不同年级和学科大学生的学业收获水平现状。调查发现,在教育因素方面,五大指标中的校园环境支持度、学习过程中的课程学习行为和深度学习中的整合性学习与学生自我报告的学业收获显著相关。 相似文献
3.
本研究采用定量研究。通过对广东某高校81名大学生外语学习观念的调查,结果显示：外语学习观念的五个因素都在不同程度上影响着学生的学习;此外,男生和女生在总体的外语学习观念上不存在显著的差异,但在语言学习难度、动机和期望学习观念方面,男生和女生存在显著的差异。基于本研究结果,本文提出了相关建议以期提高英语教学成效。 相似文献
4.
研究型大学学生学习性投入对学习收获的影响机制研究——基于2009年“中国大学生学情调查”的数据分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
王纾 《清华大学教育研究》2011,32(4)
大学生学习性投入是近20年来大学生学习与发展领域中的关键概念,对于探索大学教育过程及其有效性具有重要价值。本研究在大学影响力模型的分析框架之下,采用中国大学生学情调查(NSSE-China)2009年数据,通过结构方程模型取向的路径分析方法,建构了包括大学生教育过程输入、过程、输出三大类变量的因果关系模型,重点考察研究型大学中学生学习性投入对学习收获的影响机制。其结果表明,学生学习性投入作为过程变量对学生学业收获的影响比院校环境和学生家庭背景等输入因素的影响更大;学生学习性投入的各维度对学生学习收获的作用机制及影响大小各不相同。因此,院校教育质量的改进,应当以院校主导的改善学生学习性投入为抓手,加大挑战与强化支持并举,刺激并带动学生主导的学习性投入,促进学生全面发展。 相似文献
5.
文章采用NSSE-China2012作为调查工具,以Y民办高校四年制本科师范生中的二年级学生为调查对象,对其学习性投入现状调查后发现,民办高校师范生学习性投入五大指标间存在明显差异,其中生师互动水平最低;学科类型、是否独生子女、生源地差异影响师范生学习性投入水平;家庭经济状况、学业挑战水平、教育经历丰富度和校园环境支持度对师范生学习收获有显著影响。 相似文献
6.
7.
学习投入度作为学校人才培养质量的重要影响因素,已经被广泛应用在高校教育质量评价和大学生学情调查中,然而其在高职院校的教学质量评价中的应用仍有待提高。研究基于Kuh的学习性投入理论,选择NSSE常模中的四大主题学习性投入指标,对问卷进行汉化和高职化调整,在全国范围内对10所高职院校共3688名学生进行问卷调查。抽样调查发现,高职院校学生学习投入度有很大提升空间,四大主题中学业挑战度、同伴学习和师生互动得分较低,校园环境得分较高。不同年龄、母亲受教育程度和不同生源的学生学习投入存在显著差异。建议“三教”改革要聚焦学生和学习,大力促进学生学习性投入,给予非高考生更多的学业指导和帮助,提升课程的高阶学习比重,提高学生的多元化交流能力,加强对学生的学业支持和指导,提高学生服务水平,帮助学生取得学业成功。 相似文献
8.
李旭 《上海教育评估研究》2014,3(2):45-49
本研究采用自编调查问卷的方式,以浙江师范大学的全日制本科生为研究对象,从学业
挑战度、主动合作学习水平、生师互动程度、教育经验丰富度、校园环境支持度五个维度对学生的学
习性投入状况进行测量。研究发现,主动合作学习水平存在显著的性别差异和年级差异;生师互动
程度也存在性别特征,但没有年级和科类差异;由于科类属性的不同导致学业挑战度存在着专业差
异性。 相似文献
9.
为了解中职生学业行为的现状,并探讨家庭因素对中职生学业行为的影响,本文以陕西省宝鸡市为例,采用问卷法对宝鸡市415名中职生进行了调查。结果发现:(1)中职生学业行为各维度得分存在显著差异,学习态度得分最高,其他依次为成就动机、注意力/坚持性、学习策略/灵活性,学习效能感得分最低;(2)中职生的学业行为存在显著的性别差异和年级差异,女生的学习态度比男生积极,但学习策略/灵活性却较男生差,一年级学生的注意力/坚持性高于二年级学生。(3)家庭经济条件不同的中职生在学习态度上存在显著差异;父母关系不同的中职生在学习的注意力/坚持性上存在显著差异,亲子关系不同的中职生在学业行为五个维度上均存在显著差异。结论:家庭因素是影响中职生学业行为的重要因素,中职学校教育管理要加强与中职生家庭的沟通与合作,引导家庭与学校教育形成合力,共同促进中职生的学业适应。 相似文献
10.
11.
基于2016年和2019年两次全国性调查与测评数据,采用似不相关回归模型,本研究考察了以课业学习为主的学习投入对大学生学业表现和高阶思维能力的双重效用。研究发现,学习投入是一把“双刃剑”。一方面,学习投入越高学生的GPA也越高,两者表现为单一走势的线性关系,验证了学习投入“越多越好”。另一方面,学习投入超过一定限度后对批判性思维能力的效用会发生方向性改变,两者表现为倒U型的曲线关系,表明学习投入存在“适度区间”。这说明学习投入理论中的“越多越好”假设、“适度区间”假设均仅在评估特定学习成果时成立。进一步分析发现,学习投入带来的GPA高涨是以侵蚀批判性思维能力发展为代价的。这些结果对学界深化学习投入研究、高校优化人才培养目标具有指导意义。 相似文献
12.
Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
This study examines (1) the extent to which student engagement is associated with experimental and traditional measures of
academic performance, (2) whether the relationships between engagement and academic performance are conditional, and (3) whether
institutions differ in terms of their ability to convert student engagement into academic performance. The sample consisted
of 1058 students at 14 four-year colleges and universities that completed several instruments during 2002. Many measures of
student engagement were linked positively with such desirable learning outcomes as critical thinking and grades, although
most of the relationships were weak in strength. The results suggest that the lowest-ability students benefit more from engagement
than classmates, first-year students and seniors convert different forms of engagement into academic achievement, and certain
institutions more effectively convert student engagement into higher performance on critical thinking tests.
*A version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego,
April 2004. 相似文献
13.
Academic performance and student well-being are two desired outcomes of any learning and instruction process. The purpose of the present study was to test the temporal order of the relationships between academic performance and two forms of student well-being (i.e., student engagement and burnout) in a specific context. 142 psychology undergraduate students completed self-reported measures of student engagement and student burnout in two waves, during a semester. Also, we included their grades from two intermediate evaluations. Path analysis models suggested that academic grades could be considered antecedents of student engagement and student burnout, while the well-being measures cannot be considered antecedents of the academic performance. These findings provide additional knowledge regarding the relationships between academic well-being and academic performance. 相似文献
14.
Tzu-Ling Hsieh 《Higher Education》2014,68(3):417-433
The purpose of this study is to understand predictors of different learning outcomes among various student background characteristics, types of learning motivation and engagement behaviors. 178 junior students were surveyed at a 4-year research university in Taiwan. The scales of motivation, engagement and perceived learning outcomes were adapted from the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire and the National Survey of Student Engagement College Student Report. Multiple hierarchical regression analysis was used in data analysis. Findings confirm that different student background characteristics and learning motivation can predict different learning outcomes. However, student engagement behaviors cannot significantly predict different types of learning outcomes when student background and learning motivation variables are included. This study also finds that student’s majors play an important role in explaining learning outcomes. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of learning motivation and suggest that instructors can provide students with more successful learning experiences to ensure more confidence in their learning abilities. 相似文献
15.
Peter Zeegers 《高等教育研究与发展》2004,23(1):35-56
Learning outcomes in higher education are of considerable interest to students, teaching staff, researchers, tertiary education institutions and funding authorities. To improve the quality of learning outcomes may require a better understanding of what happens in the learning process from the perspective of the learner. This study makes use of a number of current instruments for the evaluation of student learning to explore aspects of learning outcomes in terms of academic achievement. The students evaluated were either in their first year of study (N=194) or in the third year of their course (N=118). A causal mode of learning outcomes was developed for each group and evaluated using the PLSPATH program to explore the impact of student‐related causative factors. A number of these factors were shown to have a direct effect on student academic achievement, as measured by annual grade point average (GPA), with some consistency across two year‐levels. The most important factor in predicting academic performance for both groups was students' prior academic performance. Approaches to learning and English language skills were also shown to have some predictive value. Students' metacognitive skills and self‐efficacy, though showing strong inter‐relationships with other factors, did not show a direct effect on academic achievement. 相似文献
16.
Douglas Jay Lynch Hernando Trujillo 《International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education》2011,9(6):1351-1365
Students enter college chemistry courses with different sources of motivation, appropriate or inappropriate assumptions about
their probability of success and how to study. This study is theoretically aligned with self-regulated learning research.
Clearly, academic performance is closely related to student motivational beliefs and learning strategies. This study investigated
the motivational beliefs and learning strategies of 2 years of college students in the second semester of organic chemistry.
Responses to the Motivational Beliefs and Learning Strategies Questionnaire indicated that student self-efficacy was highly
correlated with academic performance (semester grades). Gender differences were quite pronounced. Male academic performance
was associated with intrinsic motivation as well as the importance placed on the learning task. Test anxiety was negatively
associated with male grades. Extrinsic motivation was negatively correlated with female grades. Responses to students’ sense
of control over learning, the value of the learning task, and self-efficacy were significantly higher for males compared to
females. Faculty who attend to these different patterns may influence beliefs as well as learning strategies. Correcting erroneous
assumptions about how to learn chemistry may help students shift both their attitudes and their learning practices. The notable
gender difference suggests that female chemistry students may especially profit from focused faculty intervention. 相似文献
17.
Katja Derr Reinhold Hübl Mohammed Zaki Ahmed 《European Journal of Engineering Education》2018,43(6):911-926
The article describes the development and evaluation of a web-based pre-course in mathematics, delivered to four cohorts of engineering students at a German university. Based on demographic, personal, and learning-related data relationships between students’ preconditions, their learning gains in the pre-course, and study success in the degree programme were analysed. The results support the existing literature in that domain-related prior knowledge and secondary school achievement play a dominant role regarding study success in engineering. The analyses also showed that the influence of cognitive predictors could only be compensated for by a strong learner engagement. At-risk students with high pre-course learning gains showed significantly better first-year performance. The number of self-tests a student attempted was positively related to pre-course learning gains and even to first-year performance, suggesting that this variable is a good indicator of student engagement. 相似文献
18.
Michelle E. Schmidt Jaime L. Marks Lindsay Derrico 《Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning》2013,21(2):205-217
Colleges are increasingly interested in ways to better engage students in their academic careers. This article reports 20 college students' experiences as mentors for at‐risk fourth‐graders through a mentoring program called The Learning Connection (TLC), run by the Community Services Office at Moravian College. The study describes students' voluntary participation in service learning activities as a source of student engagement, the characteristics of the TLC mentoring program, the process by which student mentors reported their experiences over the course of the academic year, and the benefits of the mentoring program through the eyes of the college student mentors. At the beginning of the mentoring experience, mentors reported that the primary reasons for mentoring were to make a difference in a child's life and supplement classroom learning. At the end of the academic year, mentors reported that mentoring taught them important lessons about children, themselves, community work and the value of mentoring. Mentor feedback supports mentoring, specifically, and service learning, generally, as a source of student engagement for college students. 相似文献
19.
This research examined the relationships among students?? academic majors, levels of engagement, and learning outcomes within the context of Holland??s person?Cenvironment theory of vocational and educational behavior. The study focused on the role of student engagement as a mediating agent in the relationships between academic majors and student learning. Drawing on data from a stratified random sample of 20,000 seniors who participated in the 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement, results revealed that students?? academic majors were significantly related to levels of engagement and learning outcomes. Student engagement was also significantly related to learning outcomes. Students?? academic majors generally were not indirectly related to learning outcomes through levels of engagement. An important exception to this result was found for students in Enterprising environments where indirect relationships among Enterprising disciplines and Enterprising learning outcomes were positive, statistically significant, and substantially larger than the direct relationship. 相似文献
20.
Assessment of student learning outcomes is often discussed in relation to curriculum, standards and even administration practices. However, assessment of learning outcomes is rarely discussed in light of students’ socio-emotional contexts, which might help or hinder learning outcomes. For example, do students’ perceptions of the teacher as trustworthy influence their empathic views on classmates, learning engagement, academic achievement and wellbeing? The present paper reports the results of a theoretically-driven, short-term longitudinal study designed to explore the effects of socio-emotional variables, specifically students’ trust in teachers and empathy towards self and peers on engagement for learning, academic achievement, and wellbeing. Grounded in attachment theory and the LEAFF model, Panel Structural Equation Modeling (P-SEM) results revealed three significant pathways, which provide evidence that student trust in teachers may serve to launch a domino effect of outcomes, predicting students’ empathic views of classmates, learning engagement, academic achievement, and wellbeing. 相似文献