共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
《石家庄学院学报》2018,(6):155-160
采用Aitken拖延问卷(API)、简易应对方式量表(SCSQ)、自尊量表(SES)对大学生进行问卷调查,研究了大学生应对方式(积极和消极)、自尊、拖延行为的关系,以及自尊的中介效应.结果显示:大学生的拖延行为与积极应对、自尊呈显著负相关,而与消极应对呈显著正相关;大学生的自尊水平与积极、消极应对两两相关都显著.大学生的消极应对能直接显著地正向预测拖延,而积极应对、自尊水平则能显著地负向预测.自尊水平在大学生的积极、消极的应对策略与其拖延行为之间起部分中介作用.研究表明:应对方式(积极和消极)既能直接预测大学生群体的拖延,也能通过自尊的中介变量作用间接影响拖延. 相似文献
5.
目的:探讨大学生的内隐、外显自尊与完美主义的关系。方法:随机招募120名在校大学生进行内隐联想测验、Rosenberg自尊量表、完美主义量表(FMPS)的测试。结果:①大学生完美主义在性别上不存在显著差异(t=1.25,p=0.21)。②外显自尊与消极完美主义呈负相关(r=-0.49,p0.05),与积极完美主义呈显著正相关(r=0.20,p0.05),内隐自尊与消极、积极完美主义相关不显著。③外显自尊能够显著预测消极完美主义(t=6.00,p=0.00)和积极完美主义(t=2.235,p=0.027),内隐自尊不能预测完美主义。结论:完美自尊与外显自尊关系密切,与内隐自尊无关。 相似文献
6.
以505名大学生为研究对象,通过问卷调查,运用相关分析及多元回归分析等统计方法,考察大学生学业情绪与学业拖延的关系。结果发现,大学生学业拖延不存在性别、年级、文理科差异,学业情绪的4个维度与学业拖延存在显著相关,学业情绪维度中的消极低唤醒情绪和积极低唤醒情绪对学业拖延有显著预测作用。学业情绪与大学生学业拖延有密切关系,大学生应增加积极情绪体验,以减少学业拖延现象。 相似文献
7.
拖延行为是大学生中一种常见且相对消极的现象。本文通过对193名大学生的问卷调查研究大学生拖延行为与完美主义之间的相关,探索完美主义如何在一定程度上预测拖延行为。结果发现:大学生总体拖延水平不高;拖延行为与消极完美主义中的"担心错误"、"行动的疑虑"和代表积极完美主义的"条理性"均存在着显著的相关;且"担心错误"、"条理性""、行动的疑虑"对拖延行为起到一定的预测作用。 相似文献
8.
目的探讨初中生学业拖延的特征及其与学业成绩的关系。方法采用学业拖延问卷对264名初中生进行了测量,运用SPSS15.0对数据进行统计分析。结果初中生学业拖延总体上处于中等偏下水平;男生的学业拖延水平显著高于女生;学业拖延存在显著的年级差异,其中初二年级拖延水平较高;学业拖延与学业成绩呈显著负相关,低拖延者的学业成绩显著高于高拖延者,学业成绩高的学生其拖延水平低。结论初中生的学业拖延在性别和年级上有显著差异,初中生学业拖延对其学业成绩有显著影响。 相似文献
9.
自尊需要是人类普遍的需要,是指在社会生活中,个体对自我行为的价值与能力进行肯定,同时受他人与社会承认或认可的一种主观需要,是人对自己尊严和价值的追求。它包括自尊和来自他人的尊重。本研究以534名大一到大四的学生为被试,考察大学生自尊需要的特点,结果如下：（1）大学生具有较高的自尊需要,其中自我价值需要与优势比较的水平最高,自我防御倾向的水平最低。（2）男女大学生在自尊需要维度上存在显著差异,女生在重要性追求维度上显著高于男生,而在自我防御倾向上显著低于男生。（3）独生子女和非独生子女大学生在自尊需要上存在显著差异,独生子女优势比较显著高于非独生子女。（4）干部大学生的重要性追求和优势比较显著高于非干部大学生,而自我防御倾向显著低于非干部大学生。（5）在年级比较上,大一学生的重要性追求显著高于大四学生。 相似文献
10.
《绵阳师范学院学报》2015,(10)
采用时间管理倾向量表、父母教养方式量表和学业拖延问卷对574名小学生进行测试发现:1小学生存在学业拖延,男生较女生更为普遍;三年级小学生学业拖延得分最高,其后依次是六年级、五年级和四年级;独生与非独生、城乡小学生学业拖延不存在显著差异;2父母关爱、鼓励型教养方式与学业拖延显著负相关,而控制型教养方式则与其显著正相关;3时间管理倾向总分及各因子与学业拖延显著负相关;4母亲关爱对学业拖延有负向预测作用,而父亲控制则对其有正向预测作用;时间价值感、时间监控感和时间管理对学业拖延均有显著的负向预测作用。 相似文献
11.
12.
以安徽省六安市和芜湖市793名高中生为研究对象,采用问卷调查的方法,了解高中生学业拖延的现状,探讨成就目标学业情绪和学业拖延之间的关系。分析后发现,学业拖延在学科和年级上存在显著差异,而在性别上差异不显著;高中生成就目标、学业情绪和学业拖延两两之间都存在不同程度的相关;成就目标对学业情绪和学业拖延之间的关系存在调节作用。 相似文献
13.
Individual differences in student learning influence academic performance, and two aspects influencing the learning process are the particular learning approach the students use and procrastination behaviour. We examined the relationships between learning approaches, procrastination and academic achievement (measured 1 year later as the grade point average (GPA)) amongst 428 first-year university students. Deep and strategic learning approaches positively predicted GPA, and a mediation analysis showed that the strategic learning approach also partly mediated the effect between deep learning approach and GPA. Less procrastination was associated with a strategic learning approach, but procrastination tendencies did not predict GPA. Recommendations are made for educating new students in cognitive and meta-cognitive strategies, helping reduce their procrastination and facilitating the use of deep and strategic learning approaches. 相似文献
14.
Scheunemann Anne Schnettler Theresa Bobe Julia Fries Stefan Grunschel Carola 《European Journal of Psychology of Education - EJPE》2022,37(4):1141-1164
Student dropout is a multi-causal process. Different theoretical models on student dropout consider dysfunctional study behavior (e.g., academic procrastination) and low study satisfaction as possible determinants of students’ dropout intentions during their university studies. However, these models neglect contemporary conceptualizations that assume reverse relationships between dropout intentions and other determinants of the dropout process. Until now, empirical evidence on these assumptions is scant. The present three-wave longitudinal study explored the reciprocal relationships between academic procrastination, study satisfaction, and dropout intentions over one semester. To this end, we used data of N = 326 undergraduate students enrolled in mathematics and law. Our latent cross-lagged panel model replicated existing empirical cross-sectional findings between the variables (i.e., academic procrastination, study satisfaction, and dropout intentions). Regarding the longitudinal relations, as expected, the cross-lagged effects showed that higher dropout intentions significantly related to subsequent higher academic procrastination and lower study satisfaction. Unexpectedly, academic procrastination did not significantly relate to subsequent dropout intentions. Additionally, higher study satisfaction significantly associated with subsequent higher dropout intentions—possibly due to unfulfilled expectations. Further, higher study satisfaction significantly related to subsequent higher procrastination—possibly due to more confidence among satisfied students. Our results broaden the view on dropout intentions as part of the dynamic interplay of student dropout determinants and the need to refine dropout models’ assumptions accordingly. Practically, realistic expectations seem important to reduce dropout intentions. Further, student counselors should have a closer look at the reasons for academic procrastination to develop individual solutions for this dysfunctional behavior.
相似文献15.
The primary goal of this study was to investigate whether college students’ academic time management could be used to understand their engagement in traditional and active forms of procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning. College students (N = 446) completed a self-report survey that assessed motivational and strategic aspects of self-regulated learning, time management, and procrastination. Results of regression analyses indicated that self-efficacy and metacognitive strategies initially were significant predictors of traditional and active forms of procrastination. Incorporating time management in the analyses increased the amount of the variance explained and, even in the presence of the motivation and strategy variables, time management emerged as an important predictor of both traditional and active forms of procrastination. Findings support the conclusion that academic time management is a key aspect of self-regulated learning and, as such, it can be useful for understanding the extent to which college students procrastinate when doing their academic work. 相似文献
16.
Murat Balkis Erdinc Duru Mustafa Bulus 《European Journal of Psychology of Education - EJPE》2013,28(3):825-839
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between academic rational/irrational beliefs, academic procrastination, and time preferences to study for exams and academic achievement by using the structural equation model. The sample consisted of 281 undergraduate students who filled in questionnaires at the 7-week-long summer course. Students responded to questionnaires assessing their levels of (a) academic procrastination, (b) academic rational/irrational beliefs, and (c) time preferences to study for exams and demographic information sheet. In general, the results showed that rational academic beliefs have a direct impact on academic procrastination and time preferences to study for exams. Academic rational beliefs also have an impact on academic achievement indirectly by mediation of academic procrastination and time preferences to study for exams. The results also showed that academic procrastination has an impact on academic achievement both directly and by mediation of time preferences to study for exams. This study suggested that there is a relation between academic procrastination and rational academic beliefs, which should be addressed further in counseling intervention. Knowledge about the role of irrational academic beliefs and their relations with academic procrastination may assist school/ college counselors to develop interventions for students that suffer from delaying behaviors that negatively affect academic success. 相似文献
17.
Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Robert M. Klassen Lindsey L. Krawchuk Sukaina Rajani 《Contemporary educational psychology》2008,33(4):915-931
This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination. 相似文献
18.
Richard G. Lomax 《Journal of Experimental Education》2013,81(4):216-226
A structural equation approach was utilized to evaluate a theoretical model of schooling for the High School and Beyond 1980 seniors data. The model of schooling included home background, academic orientation, extra-curricular activity, educational aspiration, occupational aspiration, and present achievement as latent variables. The results indicate that the model applied equally as well to both public and private school seniors; both academic orientation and extra-curricular activity were superior for private school seniors when controlling for home background variation; and both educational and occupational aspirations and student achievement of public school seniors exceeded that of private school seniors when controlling for home background, academic orientation, and extra-curricular activity variation. 相似文献
19.
İzzet Parmaksız 《Psychology in the schools》2023,60(1):105-121
Our preoccupation with smartphones affects our attitudes. Our changing attitudes also create disruptions in our daily routines. Smartphones, the most common technological device we use, have exposed individuals to phubbing behavior. The behavioral problem we define as phubbing causes disruptions and procrastination in our academic responsibilities. In this study, the relationship between phubbing frequency and academic procrastination tendencies of students and the effect of academic self-efficacy on this relationship were performed. For this purpose, in this study, the mediator and moderator role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between academic procrastination and phubbing was examined. The study group of the research consisted of 518 students in late adolescence from Turkey. 323 (62.4%) of the participants were females and 195 (37.6%) of them were males (Mage = 19.4 years). They completed questionnaires measuring phubbing tendency, academic procrastination, academic self-efficacy, and personal information form. It was found that academic self-efficacy was a partial mediator in the relationship between academic procrastination and phubbing. In addition, academic self-efficacy also had a moderator effect. According to these results, it can be said that the acquisition of academic self-efficacy can reduce the negative effects of phubbing, which is a behavioral problem, and the tendency to academic procrastination. 相似文献