共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 81 毫秒
1.
3.
4.
数字目录学--当代目录学的发展方向 总被引：21，自引：1，他引：21
本文阐述了衍生于文献目录学的数字目录学建立的意义,分析了数字目录学的基本原理,讨论了数字目录学的三个主要研究领域:数字资源系统的目录学研究、数字参考咨询的目录学研究和数字化学习指导的目录学研究,并提出了21世纪数字目录学建设的一些意见。 相似文献
6.
通过对文华图专创建发展历程中的目录学教学方面五种典型材料的列举,结合相关的历史背景对其各时期的特点进行分析.回顾相应时期目录学理论研究的进展,探讨文华图专目录学教育与目录学思想现代化进程的关系. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
《目录学教程》被教育部列入“面向21世纪课程教材”。该书具有如下特点:内容丰富、结构合理,资料翔实、论述详备,内容观点与时俱进,吸收了近年最新研究成果。参考文献4。 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(27-28):91-104
Before the information explosion caused the rise of serials as a phenomenon in libraries, serials were often seen from a reference point of view, causing there to be little dynamic interchange between the concepts of "serials" and "reference." More recently, because of the rise in serials consciousness due to the number and bibliographic complexity of serials, reference work has been often seen from a serials viewpoint, causing a polarization and active interaction between the concepts "reference" and "serials." Several articles and book selections concerning the relationship between serials and reference and covering the 10 year period between 1976 and 1987 are here annotated. Each annotation summarizes the argument of the article covered and relates it to the arguments of other articles covered, and to the arguments of the main essay. 相似文献
15.
顾广圻被誉为“清代校勘学第一人”,他的古典目录学思想主要体现在“不校校之”原则、校勘方法、重考据与宋本、版本目录、及“唯无自欺,亦无书欺。存其真面,以传来兹。”的态度,历来受到学术界的重视 相似文献
16.
推荐书目（简称RB）应站在整个国家立场上。RB应具有针对性、可行性、揭示信息的充分性、推荐保障机制和制度;图书馆在RB中是核心地位,但实际情况不同,这与馆员的胜任能力、知识水平、图书馆管理制度有关;在推荐内容上可以浅阅读和深阅读、传统纸质与网络同时兼顾,推荐活动绝对不能功利化;经典在现在仍是有价值的,是RB的重点,居核心地位。参考文献19。 相似文献
17.
富厚堂藏书目录有很多特点,书楼第一代主人曾国藩著录的《京师书目》与《利见斋书目》信息详细;《求缺斋书目》与《公记书目》反映出其馆藏特色;《归朴斋书目》与《艺芳馆书目》则突出其藏为实用的特点。这些书目虽没有完全反映出富厚堂的馆藏,但为后人了解富厚堂馆藏及其藏书背景提供了重要参考。 相似文献
18.
《文献学导论》一书有三个特色 :集古典文献学与现代文献学知识于一体 ;文献学基础理论与文献实用知识相结合 ;文献学研究的继承与发展相结合。 相似文献
19.
Christopher Anglim 《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2018,37(3-4):159-203
This selective bibliography is intended to assist legal researchers in researching the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.1 In addition to Article II, Clause 6, and the Presidential Succession Act of 1947,2 the 25th Amendment is part of the fundamental law governing presidential succession in the United States. This bibliography compiles books, book chapters, and law review articles to facilitate legal research in this area.3When ratified in 1967, the 25th Amendment culminated nearly 175 years of Congressional effort to resolve Constitutional vagueness on certain procedure involving the temporary or permanent incapacitation of the president. While the 25th amendment did not fundamentally change the constitutional procedure of presidential succession, it did significantly clarify areas of uncertainty with the purpose of complying with the apparent intentions of the Framers of the Constitution on presidential succession.4Since Donald Trump became president in January 2017, there has been an ongoing public debate over his provocative rhetoric and actions, and his reportedly dysfunctional presidency. In 2017, for example, questions arose about his emotional stability when he apparently tweeted threatening language involving nuclear weapons in response to statements made by Kim Jong-un, the leader of North Korea.5In addition, significant concerns arose after an anonymous letter to the editor appeared in the New York Times, allegedly sent by a high-ranking administration official, stating he or she was part part of the “resistance” within the White House, which was attempting to block some of President Trump’s allegedly more dangerous actions. The author reported that there was a group of similarly situated White House officials who believe that the president was unfit for office and that there was an effort to remove Trump under the Section 4 of the 25th Amendment.6 More recently, former FBI Director Andrew McCabe revealed that Justice Department officials had sought to discuss the possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment with cabinet officials.Because of the critical importance of the issues involved for the nation today, this article includes sources discussing when the 25th Amendment can be invoked and whether Donald Trump’s pattern of statements and behavior could give cause to invoke the 25th Amendment. As current events suggest, the issue of whether Trump should be removed under the 25th Amendment is likely to remain an issue of public concern for the foreseeable future. 相似文献