首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
参考文献引用及其研究的盲点与误区   总被引:13,自引:1,他引:13  
马诚 《编辑学报》2007,19(2):87-89
通过对《中国期刊网》收录文章的参考文献引用及其研究状况的分析,发现学术界对"论著中哪些地方需引参考文献"这一重要问题缺乏必要的探讨与研究,在参考文献引用的数量、权威性、自引率、中外文献的比例上也存在着一些误区.认为引用参考文献应遵循实事求是的原则,树立"合理引用"的观念,把好"定""选""录"3关.  相似文献   

2.
姚实林  张倩 《编辑学报》2020,32(2):169-172
针对准确引用和著录参考文献的重要性易被忽视的现状,对准确性原则的内涵进行解析,并阐明参考文献引用和著录的准确性原则与公开性、原始性、必要性、适当性、新颖性、代表性、标准化原则以及匿引、转引、崇引、滥引、诱引、曲引等不当引用行为的关系,认为编审稿件时应秉持严谨的作风,认真比对被引知识点与文后参考文献表中对应文献的关系,准确引用,按被引文献的原貌进行著录。  相似文献   

3.
参考文献的著录质量亟待提高   总被引:14,自引:6,他引:8  
雷琪 《编辑学报》2006,18(1):40-41
指出参考文献著录中存在的9个方面的问题,包括机械式转引,非必要的引用,著录时效性不强,引用非正式文献,引用地域性窄,文献引用过少,不恰当自引,剽窃及文献著录形式上的错误,并提出一些在编辑加工过程中保证参考文献著录质量的措施.  相似文献   

4.
高被引论文的参考文献的数量和质量是否有别于一般论文、具有什么特征?掌握这些特征对成功投稿国际期刊有一定的帮助。通过对化学领域8 585篇论文的文献计量分析发现:①高被引论文的参考文献数量明显比一般论文多;②高被引论文比一般论文更倾向于引用声望值和影响因子高的期刊论文。对希望投稿国际期刊的国内科研人员的启示:合理地多引用高质量的期刊论文有利于论文学术质量和影响力的提高,无须顾虑参考文献的篇幅影响稿件的采用。  相似文献   

5.
林业类科技核心期刊文献引用研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
为全面、深入分析文献引用对林业类科技核心期刊质量的影响,通过资料分析,采用数理统计方法,选择同一层次的5家林业类科技核心期刊,对其2014年全年的参考文献的引用情况(篇均引文量、引文类型、引文语种、引文的时效性、期刊自引率)进行统计和分析.结果表明:5家期刊参考文献的引用情况不尽相同,篇均引文量需要提高;参考文献来源类型主要是期刊;语种以中文为主,其次是英文,其他语种引用比较少;参考文献时效性和期刊自引率控制较为合理,但有提升空间.通过统计数据分析,希望期刊编辑重视刊发文章引文的各项指标,从而提高刊发文章质量.  相似文献   

6.
参考文献引用分类标注与科技期刊和论文的评价   总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6  
董建军 《编辑学报》2006,18(6):406-409
为了规范参考文献的引用,减小引文问题对科技期刊和论文评价所造成的影响,使得以引文为基础的各种分析方法在科技期刊和论文的评价中更加合理、更加科学,提出了参考文献引用分类标注的概念.依据被引文献对论文作用的不同和引用意义的差别,将论文所引用参考文献分为正相关性引用类、负相关性引用类和平行相关性引用类,建议在论文写作中标注出分类的标志,编辑和审稿人在编审时可据此核实参考文献引用的正确性.在论文评价时分类进行检索统计,有利于进一步规范引文分析的各项指标,变笼统的引文分析为细化的据类分析评价,使引文分析评价体系更加科学、更加可靠.  相似文献   

7.
参考文献"合理自引"与"不当自引"的区分标准   总被引:19,自引:7,他引:12  
朱大明 《编辑学报》2004,16(1):76-76
国内科技期刊界只要谈及参考文献的引用,就必然涉及到自引问题,如文献[1]即指出了自引现象的某些弊端;而文献[2]则对自引总引比应"趋于零"提出了质疑,指出应区分"合理自引"与"不当自引",并"从审稿源头上遏制不当自引",笔者对此表示赞同.但文献[1]仅从统计学意义上列举了国内外一些重要或权威学术刊物自引现象的"合理性",而未从原则上提出区分"合理自引"与"不当自引"的标准.对此,笔者认为:广大的作者和编辑要控制或杜绝不当自引,同时承认合理自引的"合理性",首先要有一种理性认识,并相应制定出区分合理自引与不当自引的原则性标准.  相似文献   

8.
论科技期刊论文的参考文献   总被引:31,自引:6,他引:25  
高鲁山  郑进保 《编辑学报》1992,4(3):166-170
文献是“记录有知识的一切载体”。科技期刊论文的参考文献是作者为指明自己的论据、数据的出处,或为提供读者参阅、查找而直接引用的文献,并列表置于文后,是论文的一个重要组成部分。近年来,我国越来越多的论文作者和科技期刊的编辑重视参考文献的引用和著录。然而,仍有很多作者和编辑对参考文献的意义认识不足,重视不够,致使大量科学论文所引文献的  相似文献   

9.
[目的/意义]为解决传统颠覆性指数计算过程中不考虑焦点文献的参考文献数量的问题,提出权重颠覆性指数(权重D指数),有助于更加合理有效地评估文献的创新性。[方法/过程]提出一种针对焦点文献的参考文献数量的调整方法——权重颠覆性指数,以1950—2023年获得化学诺奖及其对照组的论文为数据来源,一方面,从合理性与有效性两方面对比颠覆性指数与权重D指数;另一方面,针对一篇焦点文献的参考文献被其引证文献多次引用的情况,具体分析焦点文献的创新性、焦点文献的影响力、焦点文献的参考文献的影响力与焦点文献的参考文献收到引用数量的相关性。[结果/结论 ]权重D指数具有合理性,且比传统颠覆性指数更能有效识别论文的创新性;当焦点文献的创新程度和影响力越高时,引证文献越倾向于引用其参考文献;当焦点文献的参考文献影响力越高时,引证文献也倾向于引用其参考文献。  相似文献   

10.
金铁成 《编辑学报》2017,29(6):532-534
分析百度学术提供的引文存在的诸多纰漏:对期刊更名前的文献错误地用新刊名,给某些英文期刊的刊名添加多余信息,电子期刊论文的引文著录存在多余期号,无规律性的细小差错较多.提醒期刊编辑审稿、加工参考文献时切忌直接复制百度学术提供的引文来替换作者原稿中的参考文献,而应根据百度学术提供的原文链接找到原始文献,对照原文来规范参考文献,做到著录格式规范、著录内容正确、引用内容合理.  相似文献   

11.
学术论文中的引文失范问题刍议   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
不同的引用动因和目的导致各种各样的引文失范。引文的标注形式和主体内容决定了引文的形式失范和内容失范。同时,学术道德规范的缺失又引发大量的虚假模糊引文。厘清引文的内涵与外延以及它与参考文献的联系与区别,正确对待现有学术标准和规范,并在运用中使之日臻完善;责任编辑应树立正确的引文价值观,恪守职业操行,公正、合理、专业、规范地处理引文问题;作者要掌握正确应用引文的原则与方法,增强文献情报利用的能力,避免"主观故意"的引文失范。  相似文献   

12.
馆藏图书的流通统计对馆藏图书利用规律的研究有一定作用,但也存在局限性,可通过读者发文的引文统计加以弥补。读者发文的引文是读者在研究过程中利用文献的体现,尽管引用文献量要小于研究过程中实际利用文献量,但以引文作为研究样本,只要具备一定的数量,仍然具有现实意义:其一,可以研究馆藏图书的保障率;其二,可以进一步研究引文利用与流通利用的区别。  相似文献   

13.
如何正确理解参考文献引用的权威性原则   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
朱大明 《编辑学报》2009,21(6):542-543
在论述参考文献引用原则的一些文献中曾提出了"权威性原则".针对应舍弃参考文献引用的权威性原则的观点,论述参考文献引用权威性原则的内涵及其目的,并辨析有关理解和认识上的偏颇.  相似文献   

14.
为提高学术论著的出版质量,探讨学术书稿引文及其标注的规范化使用。文章介绍了学术书稿引文及其标注的作用,说明了学术书稿引文及其标注应遵循的原则,并进一步分析了在编辑加工过程中最常发现的问题,具体包括:引而不标,不加甄选地转引、滥引,断章取义、歪曲引用,引文量少或引文时间陈旧,引文存在知识性偏差,引文标注格式不规范等。提出出版单位要加强制度建设,明确作者与编辑的责任:一方面引导作者严肃对待引文及其标注,另一方面编辑在验收、审读、加工环节须严格把关。  相似文献   

15.
16.
This study assesses whether eleven factors associate with higher impact research: individual, institutional and international collaboration; journal and reference impacts; abstract readability; reference and keyword totals; paper, abstract and title lengths. Authors may have some control over these factors and hence this information may help them to conduct and publish higher impact research. These factors have been previously researched but with partially conflicting findings. A simultaneous assessment of these eleven factors for Biology and Biochemistry, Chemistry and Social Sciences used a single negative binomial-logit hurdle model estimating the percentage change in the mean citation counts per unit of increase or decrease in the predictor variables. The journal Impact Factor was found to significantly associate with increased citations in all three areas. The impact and the number of cited references and their average citation impact also significantly associate with higher article citation impact. Individual and international teamwork give a citation advantage in Biology and Biochemistry and Chemistry but inter-institutional teamwork is not important in any of the three subject areas. Abstract readability is also not significant or of no practical significance. Among the article size features, abstract length significantly associates with increased citations but the number of keywords, title length and paper length are insignificant or of no practical significance. In summary, at least some aspects of collaboration, journal and document properties significantly associate with higher citations. The results provide new and particularly strong statistical evidence that the authors should consider publishing in high impact journals, ensure that they do not omit relevant references, engage in the widest possible team working, when appropriate, and write extensive abstracts. A new finding is that whilst is seems to be useful to collaborate and to collaborate internationally, there seems to be no particular need to collaborate with other institutions within the same country.  相似文献   

17.
The citations to a set of academic articles are typically unevenly shared, with many articles attracting few citations and few attracting many. It is important to know more precisely how citations are distributed in order to help statistical analyses of citations, especially for sets of articles from a single discipline and a small range of years, as normally used for research evaluation. This article fits discrete versions of the power law, the lognormal distribution and the hooked power law to 20 different Scopus categories, using citations to articles published in 2004 and ignoring uncited articles. The results show that, despite its popularity, the power law is not a suitable model for collections of articles from a single subject and year, even for the purpose of estimating the slope of the tail of the citation data. Both the hooked power law and the lognormal distributions fit best for some subjects but neither is a universal optimal choice and parameter estimates for both seem to be unreliable. Hence only the hooked power law and discrete lognormal distributions should be considered for subject-and-year-based citation analysis in future and parameter estimates should always be interpreted cautiously.  相似文献   

18.
The references cited in scientific articles are as important as any other part of the paper, because of their usefulness to the scientific community and to abstracting and indexing services and citation databases. I studied inaccuracies in references and in‐text citations in sample of 97 of the 519 peer‐reviewed journals accredited by the Iranian National Commission for Journal Accreditation Policy (Ministry of Research, Science and Technology). The target journals published 2,980 articles with 74,577 cited references and 108,151 in‐text citations. The results showed 36.6% as the average percentage error rate (range 5.6% to 61.3%). The mean number of errors in cited reference and in‐text citations was 2.7 per article, and the mean number of errors per journal was 690. For the entire sample of articles, 4,369 in‐text citations did not match any source in the list of references (4%), and 8,683 cited references did not match any in‐text citation (11.6%). The stakeholders in scholarly communication, especially authors, pay insufficient attention to the accuracy of bibliographic references. Peer‐reviewed journals should encourage the use of standardized journal policies and quality‐control measures regarding peer review, data quality and accuracy.  相似文献   

19.
The Web impact of open access social science research   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
For a long time, Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) journal citations have been widely used for research performance monitoring of the sciences. For the social sciences, however, the Social Sciences Citation Index® (SSCI®) can sometimes be insufficient. Broader types of publications (e.g., books and non-ISI journals) and informal scholarly indicators may also be needed. This article investigates whether the Web can help to fill this gap. The authors analyzed 1530 citations from Google™ to 492 research articles from 44 open access social science journals. The articles were published in 2001 in the fields of education, psychology, sociology, and economics. About 19% of the Web citations represented formal impact equivalent to journal citations, and 11% were more informal indicators of impact. The average was about 3 formal and 2 informal impact citations per article. Although the proportions of formal and informal online impact were similar in sociology, psychology, and education, economics showed six times more formal impact than informal impact. The results suggest that new types of citation information and informal scholarly indictors could be extracted from the Web for the social sciences. Since these form only a small proportion of the Web citations, however, Web citation counts should first be processed to remove irrelevant citations. This can be a time-consuming process unless automated.  相似文献   

20.
Most college and university libraries in British Columbia are using either EBSCO or Summon Discovery search services as a “one stop shop” for users to find, save, and cite resources for their projects. The citation generators that both EBSCO and Summon offer simplify the process of inserting citations into essays, however the citations need to be accurate for users to be able to submit citations that are error free. Considering this, this article looks at the accuracy of the citation generators each service offers. A total of twenty resources were picked from student library assignments for print books, eBooks, and articles in APA, Chicago, and MLA styles to determine the number and types of errors that occur for EBSCO and Summon Discovery. The error rate was substantial enough that caution must be used when creating citations using these tools and librarians should advise users that Discovery citation generators cannot be relied upon to provide accurate citations.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号