首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
针对目前高校校园里大学生的考试诚信问题,本文作者对某校学生的作弊现象进行问卷调查,了解大学生考试的作弊率,通过相关性、显著性检验分析性别、年级对考试作弊的影响,并应用Logistic回归模型建立作弊率关于年级、性别的二次回归方程.  相似文献   

2.
通过对1371名本科生的问卷调查及14名师生的邮件访谈,对上海市范围内大学生考试作弊现象进行研究,揭示考试作弊的现状、分析考试作弊的原因、探讨考试作弊相关因素的关联、解析期末考试中存在作弊现象的模型,并针对研究所得提出相应的对策建议,力求为诚信教育提供新思路。  相似文献   

3.
本文以江苏三所高职院校的186名大学生为研究对象,通过问卷调查了高职大学生对期末课程考试的态度以及作弊行为。调查表明高职大学生在期末课程考试中作弊行为非常严重。本文从主客观角度对高职大学生在期末课程考试中的作弊影响因素进行了分析,并提出了相应的防范措施。  相似文献   

4.
采用问卷调查的方法,分析在校大学生参与赌博与考试作弊的关系,经统计分析发现,有赌博行为的学生参与考试作弊的人数高于无赌博行为的学生.二者有统计学意义,因此认为赌博行为与考试作弊行为明显相关.  相似文献   

5.
文章通过网络问卷调查法,对3所高校190名大学生就考试作弊的现状、动机、原因等进行调查、分析,并从加大思想道德教育,提高诚信意识,加强学风建设,完善相关制度,减少作弊条件等方面提出防止大学生作弊的对策。  相似文献   

6.
《考试周刊》2016,(2):5-6
针对目前考试作弊现象屡禁不止和考试作弊的影响因素的多样性,以1747名辽宁省大学生的考试作弊影响的测试数据为依据建立理论模型,研究大学生的考试作弊动机、态度对考试作弊的影响。研究结果表明不同因素对考试作弊的影响差距很大,可以通过控制内在动机和外在动机减少考试作弊。研究结果将为减少考试作弊现象、改进考试制度提供有效的参考。  相似文献   

7.
本文试图通过对大学生考试作弊外部因素、大学生考试作弊的危害性进行分析,找到一条解决大学生作弊行为的途径。  相似文献   

8.
一、当代大学生诚信缺失的现状近几年由于众多因素的影响,特别是在目前市场经济发展的情况下和社会正处于转轨期的历史条件下,大学生的诚信正受到巨大的挑战,产生了一些不容忽视的问题。(一)在学业方面,首先表现在考试作弊。考试作弊由来已久,而目前的考试作弊更是“蔚然成风”,作弊手段层出不穷,因作弊而出现的新名词花样繁多,什么“枪手”、“枪手公司”、“高科技作弊手段”等,令人对考试作弊已习以为常。更有某些学校的课桌文化竟然有“学不在精,作弊则灵;功不在深,会抄就行”的说法。其次,表现在剽窃论文。有的学生对写论文极其不认真,…  相似文献   

9.
刘兴昕 《文教资料》2010,(16):234-236
本调查报告以河北省高校在校本科生为主,采用问卷调查和人物访谈的方式,抽样调查大学生考场作弊情况。在整理分析各项调查数据以及资料的基础上,本文深层次对大学生考场作弊形式、原因与防治对策三个方面的内容进行展开调查,并总结出大学生考场作弊的新趋势,结合大学生考场作弊的主要原因,针对性地提出了规避大学生考试作弊的建议和对策。  相似文献   

10.
本文以江苏三所高校的186名大学生为研究对象,通过问卷调查和logistic计量模型研究高职院校学生在期末课程考试中作弊的影响因素。结果显示,高校大学生期末考试作弊行为主要受到性别、年级、课程性质、学习态度、学风考风和作弊惩罚的影响,与学生是否为班干部、对成绩态度等因素无关。  相似文献   

11.
采用分层整群抽样的方法,对杭州下沙高教园区的某高职院校抽取280名在校学生,采用杜金等人根据计划行为理论编制的大学生考试作弊行为意向问卷,进行高职学生考试舞弊行为的调查。调查数据以相关关系和逐步同归分析等数据统计方法进行分析,探讨高职学生考试舞弊行为及其影响因素。  相似文献   

12.
潘雪 《鸡西大学学报》2014,(2):24-25,31
考试是检测学生对知识掌握的情况、了解教师的教学效果的重要途径。但目前高校存在着严重的考试作弊问题。考试作弊的手段不仅多种多样,还产生了许多危害和不良影响。大学生考试作弊的主要原因与大学生自身、学校、社会有着密切的关系。遏制大学生考试作弊,可从五个方面来着手:加强对大学生的诚信教育;完善考场监督管理机制;改革考试方法;有关部门严厉打击社会上以帮助考试作弊来盈利的人员;利用现代科学技术防止大学生作弊。  相似文献   

13.
A questionnaire assessing beliefs and behaviors associated with cheating was administered to 365 college students. Circumstances rated most likely to increase cheating were low instructor vigilance, unfair exams, an instructor who does not care about cheating, and dependence of financial support and long-term goals on good grades. Circumstances rated most likely to decrease cheating were high instructor vigilance, fair exams, high punishment for getting caught, essay exams, widely spaced exam seating, and valuable course material. Principal components analyses revealed several factors underlying planned cheating: difficulty/negative consequences of cheating, pressures, instructor personality, social norms, and interest in the course. These factors relate to the determinants of behavior specified by the theory of planned behavior. Self-reports indicated that 83 percent of respondents cheated in college and that the two most common types of cheating were giving (58 percent) and getting (49 percent) exam questions to and from other students before an exam. Acts of helping someone else cheat were more commonly reported than corresponding acts of cheating for oneself. Students with high cheating scores tended to be male rather than female, to have a low goal grade-point average, and to believe that the prevalence of cheating in college is high.Both authors contributed equally to this research.A version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, August 1993.  相似文献   

14.
端正学生的学习态度和杜绝考试作弊是各大高校普遍面临的问题。基于此,以四川省内的一所医学院校和工科院校的学生为对象,调查了在校大学生的学习态度和考试作弊的实际情况,并针对反映出的问题进行原因分析与对策探索,以期促进大学生进一步端正学习态度,进而形成良好的学风和考风。  相似文献   

15.
Using a factorial survey administered to college students at two Universities, this study examines students’ tendencies to engage in academic misconduct. The relation of strain, self-control, and deterrence theories to likelihood of cheating are further explored. The results suggest that increasing the severity of the punishment for cheating does not deter academic misconduct; however, several variables indicating an increased certainty of being caught did decrease the likelihood of cheating behaviors. Only the strain variables that indicated a student had an ill family member or that the student found the course difficult significantly increased academic misconduct. Although self-control did not have a direct effect on cheating it indirectly affected cheating behaviors through students’ perceptions of getting caught and their perception of wrongfulness of the cheating behavior. Policy and future research implications of the findings are further discussed.  相似文献   

16.
《College Teaching》2013,61(1):171-176
Abstract. This article reviews the empirical evidence on college student cheating and places it in a context that combines economic theories of benefit/cost analysis and unobservable behavior with social network analysis of how widespread rule breaking can develop in an organization. The implications are that students cheat because the benefit/cost tradeoff favors cheating; that the problem of unobservable behavior can be substantially mitigated by promoting academic integrity as the social norm; and that many factors that have contributed to the development of more and stronger relationships between college students have helped to promote cheating. The article makes ten specific recommendations for educators.  相似文献   

17.
Academic cheating has become a widespread problem among high school and college students. In this study, 490 students (ages 14 to 23) evaluated the acceptability of an act of academic dishonesty under 19 different circumstances where a person's motive for transgressing differed. Students' evaluations were related to self-reports of cheating behavior, sex, school grade, and psychological variables. Results indicated that high school and college students took motives into account when evaluating the acceptability of academic cheating. Cheating behavior was more common among those who evaluated cheating leniently, among male students, and among high schoolers. Also, acceptance of cheating and cheating behavior were negatively related to self-restraint, but positively related to tolerance of deviance. The results are discussed with reference to biological, cultural, and developmental factors.  相似文献   

18.
大学生的考试作弊违纪现象不容忽视,分析了大学生作弊原因、形式。提出了加强诚信教育、改进教学和考试方式、营造公平竞争环境、提高学生心理素质等防范考试作弊行为的教育对策。  相似文献   

19.
COLLEGE CHEATING IN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
This paper reports the results of a survey onacademic dishonesty given to samples of 392 American and276 Japanese college students in 1994 and 1995. Our datarevealed both cross-cultural differences and similarities in cheating behavior andattitudes. Compared to American students, Japanesestudents reported a higher incidence rate of cheating onexams, a greater tendency to neutralize (i.e., justify) cheating, and a greater passivity in theirreactions to the observed cheating of others. Amongcheaters of both nationalities, Japanese students ratedsocial stigma and fear of punishment as less effective in deterring cheating than did Americanstudents. Our data also revealed cross-culturalsimilarities. Among noncheaters of both nationalities,guilt was the most effective deterrent. Among cheatersof both nationalities, fear of punishment was the mosteffective deterrent. And students of both cultures,cheaters and noncheaters alike, viewed social stigma asthe least effective deterrent to cheating. In both cultures, most students react to cheating byignoring it, about one-third react by resenting it, andactive reactions (i.e., reporting the cheating orconfronting the cheater) were seldom reported.Explanations for cross-cultural differences are suggested,and implications of these findings for efforts to reducecheating are discussed.  相似文献   

20.
大学生返乡创业是拓宽大学生就业的有效渠道,引导和鼓励大学毕业生返乡创业,对于缓解当前就业压力、助力乡村振兴具有重要意义。目前,大学生自主创业中存在返乡创业及涉农比例低、淘汰率高的"两低一高"现实挑战,成效不明显。通过对浙江省8所本专科高校的1443名在校大学生的实证调查,探讨个体因素、教育因素、政策因素和环境因素等四个维度分别对大学生返乡创业的影响,提出要注重大学生返乡创业意识与能力培养,不断完善大学生返乡创业配套政策,进一步健全大学生创新创业教育体系,营造良好创业支持环境等针对性举措,以求促进大学生积极返乡创业,将创业设想变为现实,为打造大学生返乡创业模式提供"浙江方案"。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号