共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
针对供应商主导的绿色供应链,同时进行绿色供应和绿色制造,研究公平中性、供应商公平关切和制造商公平关切3种情境下绿色供应链的最优绿色创新和定价决策,并对比不同主体公平关切时的绿色效益和经济效益。研究发现：在供应商主导下,绿色创新水平受消费者偏好和绿色创新能力的积极影响,而不同主体公平关切行为对绿色创新水平影响不同;其次,不同主体公平关切的途径不同,制造商减少研发成本而供应商增加市场需求;此外,供应商公平关切提高了供应链绿色效益和经济效益,制造商公平关切则相反。 相似文献
2.
基于中国237家制造企业的样本数据,通过层级回归的统计方法探讨绿色供应商整合、外部知识采用与绿色创新的关系以及兼容性的调节效应。实证研究结果表明:绿色供应商整合有助于外部知识的采用,进而有利于企业的绿色产品创新和绿色工艺创新;外部知识采用在绿色供应商整合与绿色产品创新和绿色工艺创新的关系中均具有部分中介效应;此外,知识兼容性在绿色供应商整合与外部知识采用的关系中具有负向调节效应,战略兼容性在绿色供应商整合与外部知识采用的关系中具有正向调节效应。 相似文献
3.
研究在市场需求存在不确定性的情况下制造商、零售商的风险态度对绿色供应链最优决策的影响以及优化问题。考虑市场需求具有不确定性,在以制造商为领导者、零售商为追随者的绿色供应链中建立斯塔克尔伯格（Stackelberg）博弈模型,研究制造商风险规避与零售商风险中性、制造商风险中性与零售商风险规避以及制造商与零售商均风险规避3种情况下绿色供应链的最优决策,并分析消费者绿色产品接受度、一次性研发投入成本系数和制造商与零售商的风险厌恶系数对产品绿色度及制造商与零售商利润的影响。研究表明,提高消费者绿色产品接受度和零售商风险厌恶系数、降低一次性研发投入成本系数和制造商风险厌恶系数有利于提升产品绿色度和供应链参与者的利润。研究发现对使制造商和零售商在获取最大利润的同时最大限度地提高产品绿色度的启示包括：针对绿色产品推出先试后买的销售模式;制造商与零售商之间建立绿色产品研发成本分担契约;制造商与零售商之间建立股权合作关系。 相似文献
4.
《技术与创新管理》2017,(2)
为激励制造商进行绿色技术创新,提高绿色产品的市场需求,针对单一制造商和单一零售商构成的双边垄断供应链,建立制造商主导的Stackelberg博弈模型。考虑到绿色技术创新可以降低制造商的生产成本,研究普通产品和绿色产品在分散决策下的优劣,分析绿色产品在分散、集中两种策略下的决策与收益,进而提出基于绿色技术创新的收益共享成本分担契约。研究表明:绿色产品较普通产品更能提高供应链的经济和环境效益;集中决策和契约机制的引入,能提高产品绿色水平、订货量及供应链成员的利益,并推导出制造商和零售商参与约束的最优收益分享系数的取值范围。最后,通过数值分析了制造商的绿色技术创新意愿和消费者对绿色产品的偏好对供应链最优决策及利润的影响,验证了契约机制的有效性。 相似文献
5.
研究零售商信息分享对绿色供应链中绿色产品设计的影响,包括开发密集型绿色产品(DIGP)和边际成本密集型绿色产品(MIGP)。分别建立集中式决策以及分散式决策下零售商信息分享与不分享的模型。研究表明,与信息不分享相比,当零售商分享信息且预测信息较乐观时,两类产品批发价和零售价都提高,DIGP的绿色度提高,但MIGP的绿色度不变;零售商信息分享使MIGP供应链的期望利润降低;当绿色成本系数适中时,信息分享使DIGP供应链的期望利润提高,否则其期望利润降低。最后用改进的K-S法对供应链进行了协调。 相似文献
6.
供应商参与绿色产品创新对制造业的绿色发展转型意义重大。本文从资源动员视角，揭示制造企业通过优先获取供应商的绿色创新资源来提升供应商参与绿色产品创新效能的权力组合策略。针对中国制造业229个样本的实证研究表明，制造商权力能够通过供应商绿色创新资源的优先获取，对供应商参与绿色产品创新效能产生显著的正向影响；为了优先获取供应商的绿色创新资源，制造企业应以奖赏权为主，惩罚权作为补充并控制其强度；如果供应商不依赖制造企业，无须同时使用奖赏权和惩罚权；当制造企业掌握非媒介权力时，应尽量加大奖赏权的强度，若非媒介权力以认同权为主，还应尽可能减少惩罚权的使用。 相似文献
7.
以我国制造业为研究对象,实证研究了数字化产品、工艺和服务创新这3种数字化创新模式对绿色创新绩效的影响,并分析了吸收能力的调节效应,结果表明:数字化产品创新对绿色制造绩效有正向影响,对绿色营销绩效有负向影响,吸收能力均发挥正向调节作用;数字化工艺创新对绿色研发和营销绩效有正向影响且吸收能力均发挥负向调节作用;数字化服务创新对绿色研发绩效有正向影响但吸收能力发挥负向调节作用,对绿色营销绩效有负向影响但吸收能力的调节作用不显著,对绿色服务绩效有正向影响且吸收能力发挥正向调节作用. 相似文献
8.
《软科学》2019,(12):127-132
在单制造商与两竞争零售商构成的绿色供应链中,构建制造商与两零售商权力均等(NN)、制造商领导—两零售商权力均等(SN)及制造商领导—零售商1主导零售市场(SS)的利润模型,利用博弈论和最优化理论分析并比较不同渠道权力结构下最优决策。研究结果表明:SS渠道权力结构下零售商2获得了"后动优势",其零售价较低收益较高;产品绿色度在NN渠道权力结构下最高,SS渠道权力结构下最低;而批发价、零售价及制造商利润的相对大小,不仅取决于产品的绿色创新效率,还取决于零售渠道的交叉价格弹性系数。从社会绿色效应及环保的角度来看,NN渠道权力结构最优,而从制造商的利润来看,SN渠道权力结构最优。 相似文献
9.
10.
为了探究再制造绿色供应链中企业的最优决策以及政府的最优激励策略,建立了由普通产品和绿色产品相结合的供应链博弈模型,分析了该模型在多种情形下的最优均衡决策结果,对比了政府基于回收率补贴与回收量补贴这两种激励策略的有效性。研究结果表明:生产商采用参与回收再制造策略将为绿色供应链中的企业创造更多的利润;政府实行基于回收率补贴的激励策略将更有效地提高产品回收效率。 相似文献
11.
供应链创新研发组织结构与企业创新绩效 《科学学研究》2021,39(2):375-384
为了响应快速变化的客户偏好,企业必须依赖于供应链合作伙伴的创新以给客户提供额外的价值。本文探讨了研发组织结构对企业利用供应商和客户创新的影响。虽同为供应链成员,但供应商和客户所提供知识类型和知识整合难度均存在明显差异,这需要匹配以不同的研发组织结构模式。利用制造业上市公司数据进行了验证,所得主要结论如下：相比客户创新,供应商创新对企业创新绩效的促进效应更为显著;集中研发组织的长期导向更有利于企业对供应商创新的利用,而分散研发组织的市场导向更有利于企业对客户创新的利用。 相似文献
12.
鉴于当前在探讨制造业集群供应链上供应商与制造商协同低碳创新的行为演化时，将政府环境规制、链内企业合作契约及消费者绿色偏好3类因素同时纳入同一分析框架的研究还较为欠缺，为进一步促进我国制造业集群的绿色化转型，聚焦于集群供应链内供应商企业与制造商企业组成的二级结构，将政府行为、链内契约以及消费者反馈作为企业低碳创新策略选择影响因素，构建博弈模型分析双方的长期最优均衡策略，并通过案例数值仿真分析讨论关键参数对博弈系统演化路径的影响。结果发现：当供应商企业与制造商企业分别进行低碳创新后，消费者支付意愿增值、博弈企业双方共同低碳创新与单方企业低碳创新产生的收益增幅之差、碳税抵扣额、对方违约罚金这四者之和大于企业低碳创新研发净支出时，博弈双方的长期均衡策略均为{低碳创新}；当企业低碳创新研发净支出越低、违约处罚越高、消费者绿色偏好越强时，企业越倾向于选择{低碳创新}均衡策略；碳税税率变化对企业的均衡策略影响不显著。据此，提出制定科学的环境规制政策、构建合理的链内合作契约、着力培养消费者绿色偏好等对策建议。 相似文献
13.
14.
绿色技术创新能力既是推动我国制造业迈向“中国创造”的重要战略引擎,亦是我国冲破资源束缚走向高质量发展之路的关键要素。本文以中国30个省、市、自治区为案例,基于组态框架,运用tsQCA方法厘清影响制造业绿色技术创新能力要素间的协调联动关系,剖析导致不同区域制造业绿色技术创新能力差异的多重并发因果机制与多元路径。研究表明：(1)高绿色技术创新能力的组态有三种,包括人力-经济资源下资金基础主导型、多元综合主导型与经济-自然资源下技术转化主导型,经济资源投入是制造业绿色技术创新能力提升的主要推动力；(2)非高绿色技术创新能力的组态有四种,人力资源短缺是抑制中西部地区制造业绿色技术创新能力提升的主要因素；(3)高与非高绿色技术创新能力提升路径存在非对称性。 相似文献
15.
16.
How to promote green technology innovation has attracted the attention of governments and academia at present. The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that, we should accelerate green development and promote enterprises to carry out green technology innovation. Some scholars have begun to explore how to speed up green technology innovation from different dimensions, such as environmental regulation and government support, including OFDI as one important channel of international technology spillover. Under one belt and one road construction, the strategy of "going out" are being pushed forward. China has become the second largest OFDI country in the world, and it has profound impact on both the world′s economic development and itself. It is particularly noteworthy that the adverse effects of rapidly growing OFDI on domestic green technology innovation cannot be ignored. Unfortunately, the research on the relationship between OFDI and green technology innovation in China is just in beginning, and there is still a lot of controversy, especially the lack of heterogeneous dynamic response based on the nonlinear perspective to explore the impact of OFDI on the efficiency of domestic green innovation. As well, does the rapid increase of OFDI reverse promote the efficiency of green innovation in China, and what is the effect? If there is a positive impact, how can it be strengthened? What are the dynamic evolution characteristics and internal constraint mechanism of OFDI′s reverse green innovation effect? We need objective answer to the above questions with great significance to China′s strategic coordination of opening up and green development.
Literature analysis shows that, there is no consensus on whether OFDI reversely promotes green innovation in home country, and further research is necessary. In particular, there are still some shortcomings. Firstly, most scholars mainly study the relationship between OFDI and home country green innovation from a linear perspective, but pay less attention to the nonlinear dynamic effect of OFDI reverse green innovation. Secondly, the existing research on how to effectively release the regulatory factors of OFDI reverse green innovation spillover is very limited, especially the lack of heterogeneous dynamic constraint mechanism of OFDI reverse green innovation spillover in China. The main innovation of this paper is that, from the perspective of heterogeneous nonlinear dynamics, it provides a new perspective for a deep understanding of the internal evolution mechanism of China′s OFDI reverse green innovation spillover, and also provides some policy implications for China to correctly the dynamic relationship between OFDI and domestic green innovation in China new era.
Based on Chinese 2004-2017 inter-provincial panel data, and using the threshold regression technology, this paper empirically examines the heterogeneous dynamic effects of OFDI′s reverse green innovation and its regulatory mechanism. The study results shows that: OFDI has significantly promoted domestic green innovation efficiency, and the reverse green innovation spillover of OFDI in the eastern and central regions is significantly stronger than the western region; OFDI′s reverse green innovation spillover shows dynamic evolution process from weak to strong, but only appears in the western region, and the central and eastern regions show positive "U"-shaped nonlinear characteristic; OFDI′s reverse green innovation spillover has heterogeneous dynamic strengthening mechanism. Under the constraints of industrial upgrading, urbanization, financial development, and intellectual property rights protection, there is positive and increasing marginal efficiency evolution process. Both IPR protection and trade opening are regulated with inverted "U"-shaped dynamic characteristics. At this stage, only by continuously accelerating industrial upgrading and urbanization, continuously strengthening financial support and intellectual property protection, while maintaining moderate level of trade opening and government science and technology funding, OFDI′s green innovation spillover could be released in maximum.
The conclusions of this paper reveal the following policy implications: firstly, under one belt and one road construction, as well as opening up policy will continue to enhance the OFDI scale to promote green innovation development in the opposite direction. OFDI has become the main driving force for the development of green innovation in China. At the same time, we should implement more targeted regional policy on the relationship between OFDI and green innovation, especially focus on releasing the spillover bonus of OFDI reverse green innovation in the East and central region, while the west region should pay more attention on its own absorption capacity building. Secondly, China′s OFDI reverse green innovation spillover has dynamic evolution characteristics of positive and increasing marginal efficiency, but functions in different regions. We should pay attention on the heterogeneous dynamic characteristics. The effect of OFDI reverse green innovation spillover in the eastern and central region is quite significant, there is still a large space for improvement in the positive impact. Although the negative green innovation effect of OFDI in the western region has the nonlinear characteristics of positive and increasing marginal efficiency, the positive effect is relatively limited at this stage. In the future, we should implement differentiated and dynamic OFDI and green innovation policies to avoid the loss of OFDI′s reverse green effect caused by homogenization and static policies. Thirdly, we should continue to improve the spillover effect of OFDI′s reverse green innovation by accelerating the process of industrial upgrading and urbanization, strengthening financial support, government funding for science and technology, intellectual property protection, and promoting trade opening in long term, we should also make trade openness and government funding for science and technology at a moderate level. In addition, the dynamic strengthening effect of above factors on OFDI′s reverse green innovation spillover should not be ignored. In additional to government funding and trade openness, other factors on OFDI reverse green innovation spillover are not effective. Therefore, in order to adjust the relationship between OFDI and green innovation scientifically in China new era, we should pay more attention to the integration of OFDI and the above factors, to release the reverse green innovation spillover bonus of OFDI in maximum. 相似文献
17.
绿色创新双外部性特征决定了制度环境是激励绿色创新开展的基本保障。本文基于我国2005—2015年30个省级单位的面板数据,利用动态空间杜宾模型从直接影响和空间溢出效应两个方面研究制度环境对工业绿色创新的空间效应。结果表明：环境管制制度环境对工业绿色创新有显著的促进作用和正向空间溢出效应。在市场制度环境中,教育扶持、非国有化水平对工业绿色创新有显著的促进作用和正向空间溢出效应,而科技扶持和金融支持对工业绿色创新均有一定程度的抑制作用;对外开放度对工业绿色创新的正向空间溢出效应显著。法律制度环境对工业绿色创新有显著的促进作用和正向空间溢出效应。在此基础上,为考察不同地理区位条件下制度环境对工业绿色创新的影响,进一步将全国分为一带一路地区和非一带一路地区进行深入研究。 相似文献
18.
《中国制造2025》为中国走绿色制造可持续发展道路提供了政策导向。基于绿色制造-物流协同演化背景，本文认为企业知识链创新必须在实体产业与知识链的融合过程中进行研究，才能保障企业知识链获得创新生命力，避免知识链路径依赖的制约；同时也可以进一步发展和完善企业知识链的理论研究。本文在研究分析知识链内涵与局限性基础上，论述了绿色制造-物流协同演化下企业知识链创新的必要性；其次，从信息结构入手破解知识链路径依赖的可行性；最后基于绿色制造-物流协同背景构建知识链反馈回路模型，并提出了相应的创新对策。 相似文献
19.
Rachel Duffy Andrew Fearne Sue Hornibrook Karise Hutchinson Andrea Reid 《International Journal of Information Management》2013
Given the crucial role of suppliers in collaborative supply chains, it is surprising that little attention has been paid to the nature and management of supplier relationships in the implementation of a retailer's Customer Relationship Management (CRM) strategy. To address this gap in the extant literature, the theory of organizational justice is used to explore the extent to which perceived fairness in buyer–supplier relationships supports or inhibits supplier engagement with the CRM process. The rationale is that suppliers who feel fairly treated by key retail customers are more likely to invest resources in the acquisition and use of data central to the retailer's CRM strategy. By empirically testing a conceptual model linking downstream CRM to upstream SRM, the results provide evidence to indicate that customer data use is significantly influenced by perceptions of fairness, particularly with respect to the distribution of rewards, and the transparency of decision-making processes. As a key criticism of CRM centers upon the failure of organizations to exploit the full potential of customer data, the results highlight the usefulness of understanding the relational linkages between buyers and suppliers and the consequential behavior of suppliers in terms of engagement with customer data vital to the success of retailers’ CRM strategies. 相似文献