共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 734 毫秒
1.
学生道德社会化过程有五个构成要素,即社会化历程、社会化承受者、社会化承担者、社会化内容和社会化模式。本文讨论的是前三个构成要素研究中的进展与困惑,发表涉及“年轻人的社会断乳期为何在延长”、“学生社会化过程中是否有危机阶段”、“何谓人的过度社会化”、“以学生为中心是否称得上一个科学的命题”、“怎样估量四大社会化承担者的贡献率”等问题。本文所担心的不是被识别出的困惑之多少,而是其真假。 相似文献
2.
联合国教科文组织国际教育发展委员会的著名报告<学会生存>在谈到学校教育时指出,儿童的人格被分裂成两个互不接触的世界--"在一个世界里,儿童像一个脱离现实的傀儡一样,从事学习;而在另一个世界里,他通过某种违背教育的活动来获得满足".造成这种状况的原因是多方面的,其中一个重要原因就是长期的封闭式德育,严重地脱离社会生活.因此,德育理应融入社会生活之中,引导学生直面社会生活的挑战,直面人生的现实问题,让学生正确认识社会生活,真正适应社会生活,以自己高尚的道德素养去干预社会生活,并善于创造新生活,这是道德教育改革应直面的重要课题. 相似文献
3.
我国当前青少年道德感缺乏的现象比较严重,因而成人教育重于、先于成才教育,道德社会化的重要性和紧迫性不容忽视。 相似文献
4.
大学生道德社会化任务探索 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
道德理想的构建和道德能力的培养是大学生道德社会化的重要任务。道德性成为大学生道德理想的重要组成部分，道德判断能力和道德行为能力是大学生道德能力的重要内容。道德社会化任务的达成方式要符合社会要求，适合学生身心发展，将体现时代精神的内容、原则、方法引入德育，通过教师的主导作用和学生的主观能动性，促进大学生的道德社会化。 相似文献
5.
道德社会化是大学生在成长成才过程中不可回避的问题。道德价值在社会生活和社会价值体系中的边缘化,道德社会化理论的不成熟,大学道德教育理想图景的缺乏,以及缺少人与人、人与社会之间关系的道德实践,是造成大学生道德社会化程度不高的主要原因。加强大学生社会化研究,建立促进大学生道德社会化的长效机制对提高人才素质具有重要意义。 相似文献
6.
黄馨 《和田师范专科学校学报》2006,26(5):67-68
当代大学生的道德社会化是当代大学生道德素质培养的基本途径,道德教化是大学生道德社会化的前提条件。本文从道德教化的视角,针对当前高校道德教化的现实问题,谈当代大学生的道德社会化。 相似文献
7.
大学生道德社会化问题的研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
道德社会化是大学生在成长成才过程中不可回避的问题。道德价值在社会生活和社会价值体系中的边缘化,道德社会化理论的不成熟,大学道德教育理想图景的缺乏,以及缺少人与人、人与社会之间关系的道德实践,是造成大学生道德社会化程度不高的主要原因。加强大学生社会化研究,建立促进大学生道德社会化的长效机制对提高人才素质具有重要意义。 相似文献
8.
大学生道德社会化具有多种方式和途径。道德社会化的制度性,就是以制度促进道德社会化,就是强化道德伦理的他律手段,以社会法制化促成社会道德化。道德教育的开放性在于强调道德教育工作者树立道德文化的变革与创新意识,在于强调受教育者接受道德文化的自主意识与培养道德能力,进而实现道德文化与时俱进的动态变革与创新,实现道德文化范式的时代性重构。 相似文献
9.
10.
高职院校德育在高职生道德社会化过程中具有重要作用：一是高职生获取道德认知的有效途径;二是促进高职生形成正确的道德态度的重要渠道;三是培养高职生道德能力的有效载体;四是规范调控高职生道德行为的重要方式。高职院校德育在高职生道德社会化中的作用具有系统性、可控性、正面性、引导性四个特点。高职院校德育在高职生道德社会化中的作用途径主要有课堂教学、教师影响、校园文化和社会实践等。 相似文献
11.
Edward H. Haertel 《Educational Measurement》1999,18(4):5-9
What do we need to do to establish the validity of high-stakes testing programs? How can we move away from a “confirmationist” bias? What questions haven't we been asking that we need to ask? 相似文献
12.
李玉雄 《南宁师范高等专科学校学报》2011,28(2):131-132
社会化是个体人走向社会、接受和认同社会规范、社会制度,逐渐由＂自然人＂成为＂社会人＂的过程。大学生社会化受到社会转型的影响和冲击,价值取向、思维模式、行为方式等都发生较大变化,给高校德育带来了新的挑战。针对社会转型背景下大学生社会化的新特点,必须积极推进德育课程改革,要研究和改进教学内容,创新教学理念,推进教学手段的现代化和探索新的教学载体。 相似文献
13.
Jennifer C. Ng 《The Urban Review》2006,38(5):353-372
Research has shown that individuals who become teachers are uniquely oriented to the psychic rewards of teaching such as connecting with students and making a difference. Yet, in the era of “No Child Left Behind”, emphasis upon test scores as indicators of student learning, competition within and between school districts, and threats of external sanctions seem to promote a different orientation to teachers’ work. This is especially the case in schools with limited human, social, physical, and cultural capital serving disproportionate numbers of low-income, racial/ethnic and linguistic minority students typically located in urban areas. Given the existing problem of teacher shortages in urban schools and the current impact of accountability, this study seeks to explore two questions: How do preservice teachers believe their aspirations to teach will be affected by the accountability movement? And how do these views affect their considerations about where to teach? 相似文献
14.
Lisa J. Starr 《Cultural Studies of Science Education》2010,5(1):191-200
In this paper I discuss the tension created by religion and science in one student’s understanding of knowledge and truth by exploring two questions: “How do individuals accommodate their religious beliefs with their understanding of science?” and “How does religious knowledge interact with scientific knowledge to construct meaning?” A constructivist framework sheds light on the answers to both questions in the context of process and product. 相似文献
15.
When parents pick their children up from day care or preschool, one of the first questions that is typically asked of their child is “What did you do in school today?” At an open house parents usually ask teachers, “How is my child doing in your class?” “Is my child learning new things?” “Has my child improved any since the beginning of the school year, and in what ways?” Or think of the child who turns in a product and asks, “What do you think of this, Teacher?” or “Did you like my work today?” 相似文献
16.
Jacob L. Mey 《Communication quarterly》2013,61(2):45-56
Abstract Beginning with linguistic performance as currently defined, this article systematically pursues its implications to and through the notion of “successful communication.” The four divisions of the article attempt explorations of the following questions: What does linguistic performance do? What place does it have in a theory of communication? What are the practical implications of such a theory in connection with actual language use? How is all this relevant to problems of what we take to be “linguistically underprivileged” (minority) groups? The article concludes that the concept of linguistic performance, “scientifically” based, is not significant in successful communication, which is an art. 相似文献
17.
Studying social dimensions of learning disabilities is not for the faint‐hearted, in light of the multiple and interactive characteristics of these students and their social/cultural environments. Given the allure of the risk/resilience lens to make sense of these complexities, it would be easy to embrace these concepts too hastily. Four questions seem particularly important: What do we mean by risk and resilience factors? How do we characterize learning disabilities as risk factors?“At risk” for what? How should this framework guide intervention efforts? Rigorous thinking about these issues may enhance the promise of risk/resilience models for future research on social development. 相似文献
18.
This study is an attempt to contribute to the growing body of knowledge about students' conceptions and views concerning environmental and natural resource issues. Answers have been sought to the following questions: “How do Swedish students in grade 9 (15–16 years old) and grade 12 (18–19 years old) explain the greenhouse effect?”, “How do they think reduction of CO2 emission would affect society?” and “How do they explain that the depletion of the ozone layer is a problem?” The method chosen to answer these questions was to give students written tasks of the open‐ended type. Five models of the greenhouse effect appear among the answers, all more or less incomplete, but nevertheless with potential for development. The students' responses also indicate that they do not fully understand what fundamental societal changes would occur as a result of a drastic reduction in CO2 emission. On the other hand, they are rather well informed about how injurious depletion of the ozone layer is to humans. The findings are discussed, including implications for teaching. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 37: 1096–1111, 2000 相似文献
19.
Roger Kaufman Ryan Watkins Melvin Stith Don Triner 《Performance Improvement Quarterly》1998,11(3):32-44
Where are the world's organizations headed? What do they see as their primary destination and contribution? What do they commit to deliver and to whom? How rigorous are they in defining their destinations? What label do they use to describe statements of their intended future? To find the answers to these and other questions, we examined 26 of the leading organizations internationally as well as 60 leading organizations in the United States. Based on this sample of world organizations, we found indications that many organizations see some aspect of societal good as basic to their future, while many others regard their own organization's well-being as what is most important. We find no clear favorite for what organizations label their statements of purpose: most use “mission” while some use “vision,” and some use “values” or “philosophy.” Few of the organizations in our sample state their intended destination in measurable performance terms. From these data, we discuss the implications in terms of an increasing emphasis in the literature on organizations having to deliver outputs that contribute to external clients and society. We also note that purpose statements must be accompanied by appropriate actions to achieve those intentions. In addition, we discuss how this move toward socially-responsive organizations is impacting the role of the performance technologist. 相似文献
20.
＂性善＂与＂性恶＂这一人性理论的不同是孟子与荀子道德社会化思想差异的基础。在此基础上,两者的思想理论在道德社会化的目标、核心内容和实现途径方面均存在差异：孟子认为道德社会化就是社会个体通过＂养气＂、＂寡欲＂等自我教育方式成为兼具＂仁义礼智＂高尚道德的人;荀子则认为道德社会化是通过建立一个统一的道德教育系统,在＂君子＂、＂圣人＂的榜样作用下,在良好社会环境的熏陶下,教育社会成员成为自觉遵循礼法的人。尽管存在这些不同之处,但它们都对社会主义道德文明建设有着十分重要的借鉴意义。 相似文献