共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Bruce Elliott 《Research quarterly for exercise and sport》2013,84(4):277-281
Abstract The effects of string tension and longitudinal racket flexibility on post-impact ball velocity were investigated in tennis. Six wooden rackets, two with flexible shafts, two with medium and two with stiff shafts were strung with synthetic gut at tensions of 245N (55 lb), 289N (65 lb) and 334N (75 lb). A pneumatically driven racket-arm was triggered by a stimulus from a photo-electric cell positioned at the exit nozzle of a ball machine so that impact occurred with the racket perpendicular to the path of the ball. New tennis balls were fired to impact each racket at the geometric center of the strings and 5 cm above the geometric center. The average horizontal velocity of the ball, both before and after impact, was determined using stroboscope photography. A significant interaction between racket stiffness and string tension was recorded for an inward ball velocity of 22.7 m/s and a racket velocity of approximately 6.8 m/s. String tension had no significant influence on rebound velocity for a stiff racket following impact with a moving racket. Medium and flexible rackets produced the highest coefficients of restitution when strung at 245N (55 lb) compared to 289N (65 lb) and 334N (75 lb). 相似文献
2.
Tanabe S Ito A 《Sports biomechanics / International Society of Biomechanics in Sports》2007,6(3):418-433
In this study, we examined the relationship between upper limb joint movements and horizontal racket head velocity to clarify joint movements for developing racket head speed during tennis serving. Sixty-six male tennis players were videotaped at 200 Hz using two high-speed video cameras while hitting high-speed serves. The contributions of each joint rotation to horizontal racket velocity were calculated using vector cross-products between the angular velocity vectors of each joint movement and relative position vectors from each joint to the racket head. Major contributors to horizontal racket head velocity at ball impact were shoulder internal rotation (41.1%) and wrist palmar flexion (31.7%). The contribution of internal rotation showed a significant positive correlation with horizontal racket head velocity at impact (r = 0.490, P < 0.001), while the contribution of palmar flexion showed a significant negative correlation (r = - 0.431, P < 0.001). The joint movement producing the difference in horizontal racket head velocity between fast and slow servers was shoulder internal rotation, and angular velocity of shoulder internal rotation must be developed to produce a high racket speed. 相似文献
3.
4.
Satoru Tanabe Akira Ito 《Sports biomechanics / International Society of Biomechanics in Sports》2013,12(3):418-433
In this study, we examined the relationship between upper limb joint movements and horizontal racket head velocity to clarify joint movements for developing racket head speed during tennis serving. Sixty-six male tennis players were videotaped at 200 Hz using two high-speed video cameras while hitting high-speed serves. The contributions of each joint rotation to horizontal racket velocity were calculated using vector cross-products between the angular velocity vectors of each joint movement and relative position vectors from each joint to the racket head. Major contributors to horizontal racket head velocity at ball impact were shoulder internal rotation (41.1%) and wrist palmar flexion (31.7%). The contribution of internal rotation showed a significant positive correlation with horizontal racket head velocity at impact (r = 0.490, P < 0.001), while the contribution of palmar flexion showed a significant negative correlation (r = ? 0.431, P < 0.001). The joint movement producing the difference in horizontal racket head velocity between fast and slow servers was shoulder internal rotation, and angular velocity of shoulder internal rotation must be developed to produce a high racket speed. 相似文献
5.
Abstract The dynamic properties of six types of tennis balls were measured using a force platform and high-speed digital video images of ball impacts on rigidly clamped tennis rackets. It was found that the coefficient of restitution reduced with velocity for impacts on a rigid surface or with a rigidly clamped tennis racket. Pressurized balls had the highest coefficient of restitution, which decreased by 20% when punctured. Pressureless balls had a coefficient of restitution approaching that of a punctured ball at high speeds. The dynamic stiffness of the ball or the ball-racket system increased with velocity and pressurized balls had the highest stiffness, which decreased by 35% when punctured. The characteristics of pressureless balls were shown to be similar to those of punctured balls at high velocity and it was found that lowering the string tension produced a smaller range of stiffness or coefficient of restitution. It was hypothesized that players might consider high ball stiffness to imply a high coefficient of restitution. Plots of coefficient of restitution versus stiffness confirmed the relationship and it was found that, generally, pressurized balls had a higher coefficient of restitution and stiffness than pressureless balls. The players might perceive these parameters through a combination of sound, vibration and perception of ball speed off the racket. 相似文献
6.
The dynamic properties of six types of tennis balls were measured using a force platform and high-speed digital video images of ball impacts on rigidly clamped tennis rackets. It was found that the coefficient of restitution reduced with velocity for impacts on a rigid surface or with a rigidly clamped tennis racket. Pressurized balls had the highest coefficient of restitution, which decreased by 20% when punctured. Pressureless balls had a coefficient of restitution approaching that of a punctured ball at high speeds. The dynamic stiffness of the ball or the ball-racket system increased with velocity and pressurized balls had the highest stiffness, which decreased by 35% when punctured. The characteristics of pressureless balls were shown to be similar to those of punctured balls at high velocity and it was found that lowering the string tension produced a smaller range of stiffness or coefficient of restitution. It was hypothesized that players might consider high ball stiffness to imply a high coefficient of restitution. Plots of coefficient of restitution versus stiffness confirmed the relationship and it was found that, generally, pressurized balls had a higher coefficient of restitution and stiffness than pressureless balls. The players might perceive these parameters through a combination of sound, vibration and perception of ball speed off the racket. 相似文献
7.
The purpose of this study was to assess the contributions of racket arm joint rotations to the racket tip velocity at ball impact in table tennis topspin backhands against topspin and backspin using the method of Sprigings et al. (1994). Two cine cameras were used to determine three-dimensional motions of the racket arm and racket, and the contributions of the rotations for 11 male advanced table tennis players. The racket upward velocity at impact was significantly higher in the backhand against backspin than against topspin, while the forward velocity was not significantly different between the two types of backhands. The negative contribution of elbow extension to the upward velocity was significantly less against backspin than against topspin. The contribution of wrist dorsiflexion to the upward velocity was significantly greater against backspin than against topspin. The magnitudes of the angular velocities of elbow extension and wrist dorsiflexion at impact were both similar between the two types of backhands. Our results suggest that the differences in contributions of elbow extension and wrist dorsiflexion to the upward velocity were associated with the difference in upper limb configuration rather than in magnitudes of their angular velocities. 相似文献
8.
The application of advanced engineering to tennis racket design has influenced the nature of the sport. As a result, the International Tennis Federation has established rules to limit performance, with the aim of protecting the nature of the game. This paper illustrates how changes to the racket affect the player-racket system. The review integrates engineering and biomechanical issues related to tennis racket performance, covering the biomechanical characteristics of tennis strokes, tennis racket performance, the effect of racket parameters on ball rebound and biomechanical interactions. Racket properties influence the rebound of the ball. Ball rebound speed increases with frame stiffness and as string tension decreases. Reducing inter-string contacting forces increases rebound topspin. Historical trends and predictive modelling indicate swingweights of around 0.030–0.035 kg/m2 are best for high ball speed and accuracy. To fully understand the effect of their design changes, engineers should use impact conditions in their experiments, or models, which reflect those of actual tennis strokes. Sports engineers, therefore, benefit from working closely with biomechanists to ensure realistic impact conditions. 相似文献
9.
Abstract This study compared the amount of spin imparted to a tennis ball during impact with conventionally and diagonally strung tennis rackets. Balls were projected at the rackets at an angle of approximately 45°. The head of each racket was oriented vertically and clamped to eliminate any influence that deformations of the frame would have on the forces transmitted to the ball during impact. Ten multiple-image photographs (five using a relatively slow ball velocity and five using a relatively fast ball velocity) were taken of a ball approaching, striking, and leaving the rackets. For similar pre-impact conditions, it was found that the angular impulse of the contact force applied to the ball (and hence the amount of spin) was almost identical for the two string configurations. Possible explanations of this finding are discussed. 相似文献
10.
A forward dynamics computer simulation for replicating tennis racket/ball impacts is described consisting of two rigid segments
coupled with two degrees of rotational freedom for the racket frame, nine equally spaced point masses connected by 24 visco-elastic
springs for the string-bed and a point mass visco-elastic ball model. The first and second modal responses both in and perpendicular
to the racket string-bed plane have been reproduced for two contrasting racket frames, each strung at a high and a low tension.
Ball/string-bed normal impact simulations of real impacts at nine locations on each string-bed and six different initial ball
velocities resulted in <3% RMS error in rebound velocity (over the 16–27 m/s range observed). The RMS difference between simulated
and measured oblique impact rebound angles across nine impact locations was 1°. Thus, careful measurement of ball and racket
characteristics to configure the model parameters enables researchers to accurately introduce ball impact at different locations
and subsequent modal response of the tennis racket to rigid body simulations of tennis strokes without punitive computational
cost. 相似文献
11.
Eighteen elite male tennis players were tested to determine their ability to identify string tension differences between rackets
strung from 210 N (47 lb) to 285 N (64 lb). Each player impacted four tennis balls projected from a ball machine before changing
rackets and repeating the test. Eleven participants (61%) could not correctly detect a 75 N (17 lb) difference between rackets.
Only two participants (11%) could correctly detect a 25 N (6 lb) difference. To establish whether varying string tensions
affected ball rebound dynamics, the ball’s rebound speed and landing position were analysed. The mean rebound ball speed was
117 km h−1, with only the trials from the 210 N racket producing significantly lower (P < 0.05) rebound speeds than the 235 N and 260 N rackets. This is contrary to previous laboratory-based tests where higher
rebound speeds are typically associated with low-string tensions. The anomaly may be attributable to lower swing speeds from
participants as they were not familiar with such a low string tension. Ball placement did not appear related to string tension,
with the exception of more long errors for the 235 N racket and fewer long errors for the 285 N racket. It was concluded that
elite male tennis players display limited ability to detect changes in string tension, impact the ball approximately 6% faster
than advanced recreational tennis players during a typical rallying stroke, and that ball placement is predominantly unrelated
to string tension for elite performers. 相似文献
12.
Roger J. Missavage John A. W. Baker Carol A. Putnam 《Research quarterly for exercise and sport》2013,84(3):254-260
Abstract This study was undertaken to establish theoretical bases for the experimental results reported by Baker and Putnam (1979), and Walanabe, Ikegami and Miyashita (1979), concerning grip firmness on a tennis racket and its effect on the ratio of post- to pre-impact ball velocity. The model predicted that, for central impacts, there was no change in the ball velocity ratio when a regular tennis racket was tightly clamped at the grip or allowed to freely stand on its butt. To validate the model further, alterations were made to two parameters of the racket—a tennis racket was modified to increase the stiffness, and a racketball racket was used to simulate a shortened tennis racket. Multiple exposure photographs were taken of balls striking the center of the rackets under the two extremes of grip firmness. Measurements were taken from enlargements of these photographs in order to calculate the horizontal component of post- to pre-impact ball velocity. It was found that shortening the length and greatly increasing the stiffness was required before the effect of grip firmness was noticeable. 相似文献
13.
Modern tennis rackets are manufactured from composite materials with high stiffness-to-weight ratios. In this paper, a finite
element (FE) model was constructed to simulate an impact of a tennis ball on a freely suspended racket. The FE model was in
good agreement with experimental data collected in a laboratory. The model showed racket stiffness to have no influence on
the rebound characteristics of the ball, when simulating oblique spinning impacts at the geometric stringbed centre. The rebound
velocity and topspin of the ball increased with the resultant impact velocity. It is likely that the maximum speed at which
a player can swing a racket will increase as the moment of inertia (swingweight) decreases. Therefore, a player has the capacity
to hit the ball faster, and with more topspin, when using a racket with a low swingweight. 相似文献
14.
Simon Choppin 《Sports Engineering》2013,16(3):173-180
This paper investigates the nature of the power point in tennis. A series of static racket impacts and a polynomial fit were used to simulate four different racket shots with increasing amounts of angular velocity—identifying the true ‘power point’ for each shot. A rigid body model was used to define the ‘ideal point’ for each shot—the impact point which theoretically yields maximum outbound ball velocity. Comparing theory with experiment revealed that the ‘ideal point’ is most accurate for impacts around the racket’s node point (the rigid body model does not account for frame vibration). Previous research has shown that tennis players aim to strike the node point of the racket. The concept of the ideal point has potential in tuning the weight distribution of a racket to a player’s shot type. If the ‘ideal point’ exists at the racket node point for a player’s typical forehand shot, then outbound ball velocities can be maximised. 相似文献
15.
Recreational tennis players tend to have higher incidence of tennis elbow, and this has been hypothesised to be related to one-handed backhand technique and off-centre ball impacts on the racket face. This study aimed to investigate for a range of participants the effect of off-longitudinal axis and off-lateral axis ball–racket impact locations on racket and forearm joint angle changes immediately following impact in one-handed tennis backhand groundstrokes. Three-dimensional racket and wrist angular kinematic data were recorded for 14 university tennis players each performing 30 “flat” one-handed backhand groundstrokes. Off-longitudinal axis ball–racket impact locations explained over 70% of the variation in racket rotation about the longitudinal axis and wrist flexion/extension angles during the 30 ms immediately following impact. Off-lateral axis ball–racket impact locations had a less clear cut influence on racket and forearm rotations. Specifically off-longitudinal impacts below the longitudinal axis forced the wrist into flexion for all participants with there being between 11° and 32° of forced wrist flexion for an off-longitudinal axis impact that was 1 ball diameter away from the midline. This study has confirmed that off-longitudinal impacts below the longitudinal axis contribute to forced wrist flexion and eccentric stretch of the wrist extensors and there can be large differences in the amount of forced wrist flexion from individual to individual and between strokes with different impact locations. 相似文献
16.
Effect of tennis racket parameters on a simulated groundstroke 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Composite materials have given manufacturers the freedom to develop a broad range of tennis rackets, allowing them to change key parameters such as the structural stiffness, mass, and position of the balance point. The aim of this research was to determine how changing these parameters could affect ball resultant rebound velocity and spin for a simulated groundstroke. A finite element model of a freely suspended racket and strings was used to determine the effect of racket parameters for oblique spinning impacts at a range of locations on the stringbed. The finite element simulations were conducted in the laboratory frame of reference, where the ball is projected onto an initially stationary racket. The mean rebound velocity of the ball was 9% higher for a structurally stiff racket, 37% higher for a heavy racket, and 32% higher for a head-heavy racket. In addition, the mean rebound topspin of the ball was 23% higher for a heavy racket and 21% higher for a head-heavy racket. Therefore, in relation to a groundstroke with an impact location away from the node, the rebound velocity of the ball is likely to increase with the structural stiffness of a racket. The effect of changing the mass and position of the balance point is more complex, as it is dependent on the relationship between the transverse moment of inertia and maximum pre-impact swing velocity. 相似文献
17.
Seeley MK Funk MD Denning WM Hager RL Hopkins JT 《Sports biomechanics / International Society of Biomechanics in Sports》2011,10(4):415-426
Peak joint angles and joint angular velocities were evaluated for varying speed forehands in an attempt to better understand what kinematic variables are most closely related to increases in post-impact ball velocity above 50% of maximal effort. High-speed video was used to measure three-dimensional motion for 12 highly skilled tennis players who performed forehands at three different post-impact ball speeds: fast (42.7 +/- 3.8 m/s), medium (32.1 +/- 2.9 m/s), and slow (21.4 +/- 2.0 m/s). Several dominant-side peak joint angles (prior to ball impact) increased as post-impact ball speed increased from slow to fast: wrist extension (16%), trunk rotation (28%), hip flexion (38%), knee flexion (27%), and dorsiflexion (5%). Between the aforementioned peak joint angles and ball impact, dominant-side peak angular velocities increased as ball speed increased from slow to fast: peak wrist flexion (118%), elbow flexion (176%), trunk rotation (99%), hip extension (143%), knee extension (56%), and plantarflexion (87%). Most kinematic variables changed as forehand ball speed changed; however, some variables changed more than others, indicating that range of motion and angular velocity for some joints may be more closely related to post-impact ball speed than for other joints. 相似文献
18.
Yoichi Iino 《Journal of sports sciences》2018,36(7):834-842
The purpose of this study was to determine hip joint kinetics during a table tennis topspin forehand, and to investigate the relationship between the relevant kinematic and kinetic variables and the racket horizontal and vertical velocities at ball impact. Eighteen male advanced table tennis players hit cross-court topspin forehands against backspin balls. The hip joint torque and force components around the pelvis coordinate system were determined using inverse dynamics. Furthermore, the work done on the pelvis by these components was also determined. The peak pelvis axial rotation velocity and the work done by the playing side hip pelvis axial rotation torque were positively related to the racket horizontal velocity at impact. The sum of the work done on the pelvis by the backward tilt torques and the upward joint forces was positively related to the racket vertical velocity at impact. The results suggest that the playing side hip pelvis axial rotation torque exertion is important for acquiring a high racket horizontal velocity at impact. The pelvis backward tilt torques and upward joint forces at both hip joints collectively contribute to the generation of the racket vertical velocity, and the mechanism for acquiring the vertical velocity may vary among players. 相似文献
19.
Measurements are presented of the friction force acting on a tennis ball incident obliquely on the strings of a tennis racket.
This information, when combined with measurements of ball speed and spin, reveals details of the bounce process that have
not previously been observed and also provides the first measurements of the coefficient of sliding friction between a tennis
ball and the strings of a tennis racket. At angles of incidence less than about 40° to the string plane, the ball slides across
the strings during the whole bounce period. More commonly, the ball is incident at larger angles in which case the ball slides
across the string plane for a short distance before gripping the strings. While the bottom of the ball remains at rest on
the strings, the remainder of the ball continues to rotate for a short period, after which the ball suddenly releases its
grip and the bottom of the ball slides backwards on the string plane. The bounce angle depends mainly on the angle of incidence
and the rotation speed of the incident ball. Differences in bounce angle and spin off head-clamped and hand-held rackets are
also described. 相似文献
20.
In this study, we evaluated the effect of the use of tennis racket string vibration dampers on racket handle vibrations, and perceptions of hand and arm discomfort experienced by tennis players owing to stationary racket impacts. Twenty tennis players (10 males, 10 females) aged 18-29 years volunteered for the study. Two different racket models were impacted at the geometric centre of the racket face and 100 mm distal to the centre both with and without string vibration dampers in place. The participants could neither see nor hear the impacts, and they indicated their discomfort immediately after each impact using a visual analogue scale. An analysis of variance (2 x 2 x 2 factorial) was performed on the scaled discomfort ratings with the factors damping condition, racket type and impact location. No significant differences in discomfort ratings between damped and undamped impacts or between the two racket types were found. Also, central impacts were found to be more comfortable than impacts 100 mm distal to the centre (P< 0.05). There were no significant interaction effects. Vibration traces from an accelerometer mounted on the racket handle revealed that string vibration dampers quickly absorbed high-frequency string vibration without attenuating the lower-frequency frame vibration. In conclusion, we found no evidence to support the contention that string vibration dampers reduce hand and arm impact discomfort. 相似文献