共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
《科学学研究》2001-2003年载文、作者和引文的统计分析 总被引：19，自引：0，他引：19
应用文献计量学的方法,对2001-2003年共16期《科学学研究》作了定量分析,并与相关文献进行比较。结果表明:该刊载文量适中,基金项目论文占37.50%;平均出版时滞165天,共有31篇载文的出版时滞仅为3个月;论文合著率60.51%,合作度1.85,该刊稿源丰广,又拥有一批核心作者和核心作者群;第一作者中具有高级职称的占58.97%,博士和博士研究生占42.17%,年龄31～40岁的占43.80%;篇均引文9.07条,引文种类多样,质量上乘。 相似文献
2.
In both the UK and Australia there has been a recent move to use citation analysis in the evaluation of the research of individuals. In particular, the future UK Research Excellence Framework (REF), proposes using citation data in the research evaluation of articles published as recently as the year prior to the evaluation. In response to this move, this research develops an indicator at the level of individual articles that, when normalized, can supplement peer review. The new hybrid indicator is the weighted sum of two indicators in common usage: the article’s total number of citations in a citation window, and the Impact Factor of the journal in which the article was published. This research compares this new indicator with the article’s total number of citations in a longer citation window (the standard indicator of article impact). For citation windows of 0 or 1 years, the correlation of the simplified weighted sum with long-term citation is substantially higher than the correlation of the standard indicator of article citation with long-term citation. Moreover, for citation windows of as long as 3 years the standard indicator of citation correlates significantly with the month of publication, in that articles published earlier in the year are on average more highly cited than those published later in the year. By contrast, the skewing of the simplified weighted sum towards articles published early in the year is considerably less than that of the standard indicator. 相似文献
3.
《中国地理科学》（英文版）是我国创办最早的综合性英文地理期刊,分析其发文被引用情况可以了解该刊十几年来变化情况,又可以为刊物今后的发展方向提供依据。本文利用Web of Science的引文检索功能,统计了该刊2002-2012年的被引用情况,从载文量、篇均被引频次、单篇被引频次、被引频次年代分布、被引论文专业分布和引文类型分布等几个方面,基于地理学学科特点和文献计量学方法进行综合分析,总结该刊目前发展存在的问题及改进措施,以期为刊物发展提供参考,更好地促进地理学科的发展。 相似文献
4.
《Information processing & management》2020,57(5):102267
Merging the citation counts of arXiv-deposited e-prints (arXiv version) with those of their corresponding published journal articles (publisher version) is an important issue in citation analysis. Using examples of arXiv-deposited e-prints, this article adopts a manual approach to investigate the processing methods used by bibliographic repositories such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Astrophysics Data System (ADS), and INSPIRE for the citation merging. Both Google Scholar and ADS consolidate all citations from the two versions into the publisher one, whereas the consolidated citations are accumulated into the arXiv version in the INSPIRE repository. All these methods ignore the categories of the arXiv-deposited versions and the corresponding availability dates. As for Web of Science and Scopus, they count the citations of the two versions separately, which is likely regarding them as two independent articles. Focusing on journal articles that also appeared as arXiv e-prints, we classify them into two categories and identify two public availability dates of articles as the starting point of citation statistics. We present four feasible schemes to consolidate citation counts for the articles with both versions and also propose a universal scheme based on the research output. Furthermore, we investigated 2,662 e-prints in the “Computer Science - Digital Libraries” subject (cs.DL) from 1998 to 2018 in arXiv.org and manually calculated the consolidated citation counts of arXiv-deposited articles with the corresponding citation merging schemes. Furthermore, these citation consolidation methods are applied to the evaluation of articles, authors, and journals. Such empirical testing proves the feasibility of the schemes proposed in this article. 相似文献
5.
《Information processing & management》1999,35(1):31-44
In earlier papers the authors focused on differences in the ageing of journal literature in science and the social sciences. It was shown that for several fields and topics bibliometric standard indicators based on journal articles need to be modified in order to provide valid results. In fields where monographs, books or reports are important means of scientific information, standard models of scientific communication are not reflected by journal literature alone. To identify fields where the role of non-serial literature is considerable or critical in terms of bibliometric standard methods, the totality of the bibliographic citations indexed in the 1993 annual cumulation of the SCI and SSCI databases, have been processed. The analysis is based on three indicators, the percentage of references to serials, the mean references age, and the mean reference rate. Applications of these measures at different levels of aggregation (i.e., to journals in selected science and social science fields) lead to the following conclusions. 1. The percentage of references to serials proved to be a sensitive measure to characterise typical differences in the communication behaviour between the sciences and the social sciences. 2. However, there is an overlap zone which includes fields like mathematics, technology oriented science, and some social science areas. 3. In certain social sciences part of the information seems even to be originated in non-scientific sources: references to non-serials do not always represent monographs, pre-prints or reports. Consequently, the model of information transfer from scientific literature to scientific (journal) literature assumed by standard bibliometrics requires substantial revision before valid results can be expected through its application to social science areas. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
《Research Policy》2022,51(10):104587
We study the role of informal collaboration in academic knowledge production using published research papers previously presented and discussed at the NBER Summer Institute. We show that papers that have a discussant are published in highly-ranked journals and are more likely to be published in a top journal. Conditional on having a discussant, the quality of a paper’s journal outlet increases in the discussant’s prolificness and editorial experience. This supports the idea that discussants help reduce information asymmetries that are inherent in the academic publication process. Conversely, using social network analysis we find no evidence that citations accumulate because discussants diffuse information about the paper. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
This study investigates how business research scholars’ internationalization strategies influence their research performance and how this relationship is moderated by the availability of different knowledge-based resources. The authors analyze citations to journal articles authored by business research scholars with German affiliations and examine how the number of citations is determined by international collaborations and a researcher's knowledge resources in terms of language skills, research experience, and foreign market knowledge. The results demonstrate that the augmentation of complementary knowledge resources (i.e., when researchers lack language skills and foreign market knowledge) positively influences the performance of a collaboration-based internationalization strategy (i.e., collaborations with international researchers). The collaboration-based strategy also improves performance for less experienced researchers, but this advantage diminishes with increasing research experience. The findings provide further insights into drivers of scholars’ research performance and have practical implications for science policy. 相似文献
12.
Previous studies have repeatedly demonstrated that the relevance of a citing document is related to the number of times with which the source document is cited. Despite the ease with which electronic documents would permit the incorporation of this information into citation-based document search and retrieval systems, the possibilities of repeated citations remain untapped. Part of this under-utilization may be due to the fact that very little is known regarding the pattern of repeated citations in scholarly literature or how this pattern may vary as a function of journal, academic discipline or self-citation. The current research addresses these unanswered questions in order to facilitate the future incorporation of repeated citation information into document search and retrieval systems. Using data mining of electronic texts, the citation characteristics of nine different journals, covering the three different academic fields (economics, computing, and medicine & biology), were characterized. It was found that the frequency (f) with which a reference is cited N or more times within a document is consistent across the sampled journals and academic fields. Self-citation causes an increase in frequency, and this effect becomes more pronounced for large N. The objectivity, automatability, and insensitivity of repeated citations to journal and discipline, present powerful opportunities for improving citation-based document search. 相似文献
13.
Lei ZhangAuthor Vitae Rick Kopak Author VitaeLuanne Freund Author Vitae Edie Rasmussen Author Vitae 《International Journal of Information Management》2011,31(1):21-29
Scholars are reading more journal articles than ever, so it is important that they focus on the relevant text within the articles they read. To support this goal, this study explores enhancements to a journal reading system by applying the idea of the functional unit, the smallest information unit with a distinct function within four major components of scholarly journal articles—Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion. This study examined a set of functional units and their associations with scholarly journal article use tasks through literature analysis and validation surveys. Forty-one typical functional units were found in psychology journal articles, with varying relevance to five tasks requiring use of information in journal articles. The relationships among sets of functional units for particular tasks were also identified. A taxonomy was developed incorporating the relationships between functional units and information use tasks, which can be used to inform system design. Based on this taxonomy, a prototype journal reading environment signalling functional units was designed and implemented for testing. 相似文献
14.
15.
文章以CNKI数据库中6550篇题名包含“课程思政”的期刊论文为研究对象,运用CiteSpace工具,从文献的发表年份、中图分类号、高频关键词和研究热点等四个维度对课程思政研究现状进行统计分析。分析结果表明:课程思政的研究成果数量迅猛增长,英语类、医学类课程的研究成果最多;实施课程思政需要进行较大幅度的教学改革,并有机融合现代信息技术;对高校教师的育德能力提出了新要求。 相似文献
16.
基于CSSCI的国内知识管理领域作者共被引分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
作者共被引分析作为一种行之有效的揭示学科结构及其研究现状的定量分析方法,有着广泛的应用。本文将传统的作者共被引分析与社会网络分析相结合,对CSSCI收录的1998-2010知识管理领域的2767篇被引文献进行多元分析与社会网络分析,以期找到该领域的高影响力作者及其所关注的主流领域及热点问题。 相似文献
17.
以Web of Science（SCI-E,SSCI,A&HCI）为数据源,统计得到美国伊利诺伊大学厄本那香槟分校（UIUC）图书情报学学院（GSLIS）1936-2012年文献690篇。运用文献计量学的方法,从年代分布、来源期刊、科研合作等角度,采用定量方法对所收集的文献进行了描述性统计分析;并运用社会网络分析方法和引文分析方法,对GSLIS的主要作者合作群体和高频被引文献进行了可视化分析,客观地揭示了GSLIS科研实力的总体概况、科研合作情况及其科学研究的历史进程。 相似文献
18.
【目的】采用H指数和二八法则基于文献的被引频次来划分出期刊文献的核心区,为科研工作者提供一种把握研究热点的新方法。【方法】 以WoS中收录的84种的图书情报学期刊15592篇文献为研究样本,并采用H指数和二八法则基于文献的被引频次来划分出期刊文献的核心区。【结果】采用二八法则划分文献核心区,其核心区文献量占总文献量为6.12%~48.61%,均值为33.81%;而采用H指数划分文献核心区,其核心区文献量占总文献量为0.56%~26.09%,均值为7.80%。对学科采用二八法则划分文献核心区,其核心区文献量占总文献量80%的文献量为38.05%;采用H指数划分文献核心区,其核心区文献占总文献量为0.67%。核心区文献篇均被引频次为H指数划分大于二八法则划分。【结论】采用H指数划分期刊文献核心区比二八法则更具集中趋势,故而H指数能更好地划分出期刊文献核心区。 相似文献
19.
Patrick Glenisson Wolfgang Glnzel Frizo Janssens Bart De Moor 《Information processing & management》2005,41(6):1548-1572
In the present study results of an earlier pilot study by Glenisson, Glänzel and Persson are extended on the basis of larger sets of papers. Full text analysis and traditional bibliometric methods are serially combined to improve the efficiency of the two individual methods. The text mining methodology already introduced in the pilot study is applied to the complete publication year 2003 of the journal Scientometrics. Altogether 85 documents that can be considered research articles or notes have been selected for this exercise. The outcomes confirm the main results of the pilot study, namely, that such hybrid methodology can be applied to both research evaluation and information retrieval. Nevertheless, Scientometrics documents published in 2003 cover a much broader and more heterogeneous spectrum of bibliometrics and related research than those analysed in the pilot study. A modified subject classification based on the scheme used in an earlier study by Schoepflin and Glänzel has been applied for validation purposes. 相似文献
20.
Journal self-citation study for semiconductor literature: Synchronous and diachronous approach 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
The present study investigates the self-citations of the most productive semiconductor journals by synchronous (self-citing rate) and diachronous (self-cited rate) approaches. Journal’s productivity of 100 most productive semiconductor journals was gathered from INSPEC database, 1978–1997 through OVID. Data of citation frequency were obtained from the Science Citation Index (SCI), Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2001 CDROM edition by the title-by-title search. The self-citing and self-cited data were drawn from the Citing Journal Listing and the Cited Journal Listing of the JCR CDROM version 1990–2001. Self-citing and self-cited rates were determined by the method suggested by the JCR. Eighty-seven journals common to INSPEC and JCR in semiconductor were selected as the object of this study and were listed for statistical tests. The results of the present study demonstrate that high self-citing journals are usually older than low self-citing journals. In contrast to the self-citing data, the journal self-cited rate is not closely related to the publication year but reflects the characteristics of various journals. Journals with a short time interval of publication are more possible with high self-citing and self-cited rates. Journals with higher self-citing rate tend to be more productive and receive more citation than journals with lower self-citing rate. The journal self-cited rate has no association with the number of articles that a journal published and the citation it received. A journal with a higher self-citing rate tends to be cited more by itself. The mean self-citing rate is 9.59% and the mean self-cited rate is 15.03%. There is a significant difference between self-citing and self-cited rates within the same set of journals. 相似文献