共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
大学排行评价指标体系的比较研究 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
《教育研究》2007,(12)
随着报纸、网络等媒体的介入,大学排行的影响力日渐扩大,大学排行的科学性和合理性问题更加凸显。在影响大学排行的诸多因素中,评价指标起着基础性的作用,对《美国新闻与世界报道》、《泰晤士报》、《麦克林》、广东管理科学研究院和网大的大学排行评价指标体系进行详细的比较分析,并对我国大学排行中出现的评价体系狭隘、考量指标存在问题进行讨论,可以看出国内外大学排行评价指标存在差异。 相似文献
2.
葛秋良 《广东广播电视大学学报》2005,14(3):90-93
本文在简要分析《美国新闻与世界报导》和英国的《泰晤士报》对世界知名的大学评估与排名（最新版）的基础上,对照我国大学评估的历史与现实,对我国大学评估与排名工作及中国大学的发展应该借鉴国外先进经验的方面提出了初步的建议. 相似文献
3.
世界上第一个大学排行榜是由美国的《美国新闻与世界报道》于1983年首创的.其实我国也有第一个大学排行榜,那是中国管理科学研究院科学学研究所于1987年首创的.大学排行榜在美国始于市场,而中国始于科学;在西方责难表现为学术批评,在中国则往往表现为道德审判.大学排行榜之未来:1％研究型大学,主要采用科学计量学指标;99％非研究型大学,主要采用教育计量学和经济计量学指标. 相似文献
4.
An Examination of Integrated Marketing Communication in U.S. Public Institutions of Higher Education 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
Dawn M. Edmiston-Strasser 《Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION》2013,23(2):142-165
This research examined the strategic process of integrated marketing communication and its application in U.S. public institutions of higher education. A quantitative survey analyzed 42 leading U.S. public colleges and universities as ranked by U.S. News & World Report. To further examine the findings of the survey, qualitative interviews were conducted with nine of the survey respondents. A four stage integrated marketing communication framework, based on studies of the American Productivity and Quality Center, served as the foundation for the research. The findings revealed the importance of leadership and formal communication mechanisms and demonstrated that integrated marketing communication strengthens branding. 相似文献
5.
《美国新闻与世界报道》每年9月所推出的"全美最佳大学"排行榜尽管是对美国国内的高等学校进行排名,但却在全球范围内享有盛誉。贯穿于"全美最佳大学"排行榜中的排行理念是其精髓所在,其分类排行、重视促进人才培养的评估指标、评估方法的客观性、为消费者服务的排行理念值得中国学习。 相似文献
6.
Why Do Universities Compete in the Ratings Game? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the U.S. News and World Report College Rankings 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Marc Meredith 《Research in higher education》2004,45(5):443-461
Previous research has concluded that an institution's ranking in the annual U.S. News and World Report Best Colleges issue impacts admission outcomes and pricing decisions at schools in the Consortium for Financing Higher Education. This article expands on the previous work by analyzing the effects of the U.S. News and World Report rankings across a broader range of universities and variables. The results show that many schools' admission outcomes are responsive to movements in the rankings; however changes in rank are more significant at certain locations in the rankings and affect public and private schools differently. The results also show that the socioeconomic and racial demographics of highly ranked universities may also be affected by changes in rank. 相似文献
7.
Annabelle Estera Riyad A. Shahjahan 《Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education》2019,40(6):930-945
ABSTRACTAmid debates about the role and impact of global university rankings (GURs), very few have closely examined how GURs media outlets construct meanings of higher education (HE) in their visual representations. We critically examine publicly available visual media of students in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings and US News and World Report websites. Drawing on Stuart Hall’s heuristics of representation and attending to visual grammars, we argue whiteness maintains its racial hegemony in GURs’ student imagery through its flexibility and in/visbility. Furthermore, whiteness is entangled with other systems of oppression, particularly patriarchy, homonormativity, and heterosexuality. We suggest that GURs rankings media are not simply constructing and informing us about the quality and excellence of HE, but simultaneously teaching us how to view students, often reproducing oppressive racialized and gendered ideologies. We end with methodological implications of visual cultural studies in comparative education. 相似文献
8.
This study aims to construct ranking indicators from the perspective inside of the university and shift the ranking target
from overall university quality to undergraduate education quality. In dealing with the complexity of the concept of undergraduate
education quality, two-stage questionnaire survey was conducted to gain comprehensive opinions from 20 higher education evaluation
experts. The Fuzzy Delphi Method then was introduced to perform data analysis and help final indicator selection as well as
the distribution of weights. The results compared with ranking systems conducted by US NEWS and Guardian showed weighting
differences and greater comprehensiveness in terms of the types of measures, sources of data and different perspectives from
the students, employers and the academics. Most important of all, this study provided a more transparent ranking system and
detailed ranking methodology that are crucial for users’ understanding and use of the ranking system. 相似文献
9.
《美国新闻与世界报道》研究生院排行是大学排行的重要组成部分。研究生院排行的指标选择、数据来源方式以及统计方法都体现出科学性、可操作性以及与学院特色相适应的特点;我国研究生院排行由于起步较晚,排行方法论以借鉴为主,虽然注重本国研究生教育的特殊性,但在数据来源、指标选择、数据统计以及学院特色等方面相对于《美国新闻与世界报道》研究生院排行相对成熟的方法论体系仍存在较多问题。因此,在研究生院排行过程中要关注排行对象的特殊性与排行方法论选择的关系,以实现排行方法论体系本土化。 相似文献
10.
评价对大学的发展具有积极作用。所谓大学评价排名化,主要指排名成为一些大学评价结果的唯一表现形式,参与大学排名的机构愈来愈多,大学排名涉及的领域愈来愈广。值得思考的问题是,这么多的大学排名是否必要?大学排名的评价指标是否合理?所谓大学评价国际化,主要指21世纪之后流行的世界大学排名的实质是评价机构用一个尺度或者说一个国际性的尺度去评价不同国家的大学。四大排行榜已经对一些国家政府的高等教育政策、众多大学的办学理念、方向和行为、普通大众对高等教育的认识等产生了不可低估的影响。世界大学排名评价的科研偏好、英语偏好、理科偏好的特征是值得认真关注的。 相似文献
11.
Reviews of editorial practices and academic studies have shown that journalists often rely on organization websites—and online newsrooms in particular—to inform news stories. Yet, at a time when many academics are called upon as experts by the media, university newsrooms have been ignored. To fill this gap, this study assesses newsrooms of universities to determine whether they are providing adequate resources to cover the institution or identify experts. Previous research demonstrated higher ranked Fortune 500 companies have more comprehensive newsrooms, potentially putting them at an advantage when it comes to news coverage. To better understand whether disparities exist among the top US institutions, this study features a content analysis of the newsrooms of the top 202 universities ranked by U.S. News & World Report. Findings show that although higher ranked universities typically feature more comprehensive newsrooms, universities at all levels are missing opportunities to provide journalists with information necessary to cover the university, thus limiting visibility to outside stakeholders. The most common features were internally written news stories and links to social media. Resources specifically for journalists were less common. Assessing newsrooms is valuable because they influence media coverage, which can improve credibility and perceived external prestige. 相似文献
12.
Gary R. Pike 《Research in higher education》2004,45(2):193-208
College rankings and guidebooks have become big business. The prominent role played by rankings and guidebooks is problematic because the criteria used to evaluate institutions have little to do with the quality of education students receive. Designed as an alternative to college rankings, NSSE assesses student engagement in activities that contribute to learning and success during college. This study compared the NSSE scores for 14 AAU public research universities with their rankings by U.S. News and World Report. 相似文献
13.
Kaycheng Soh 《Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management》2017,39(1):104-115
World university rankings use the weight-and-sum approach to process data. Although this seems to pass the common sense test, it has statistical problems. In recent years, seven such problems have been uncovered: spurious precision, weight discrepancies, assumed mutual compensation, indictor redundancy, inter-system discrepancy, negligence of indicator scores and inconsistency between changes in ranking and ‘Overall’. These issues render the validity of ranking results suspect. Moreover, discussion on problems in world university ranking has been conducted mostly at the verbal level with little substantiation of supporting statistics. It is argued that discussion on ranking issues needs statistical evidential support. Modifications to the approach of processing ranking data are suggested. 相似文献
14.
大学排名在一定程度上反映了高等教育的质量,满足了公众对大学透明度和信息的需求。但同时,大学排名也可能诱使高校趋同发展,产生片面的导向。改进大学排名应明确排名的目的、作用;使用多渠道数据全面评价;将评价指标重心落在产出上;对排名进行分类,使用有差别的指标体系;建立适当的监督或顾问机构。 相似文献
15.
我国大学排行研究与实践的进展及评析 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
大学排行在传统上属于社会评估范畴。近年来,由于多主体的参与与高校改革,大学排行的传统概念与实践逐渐发生着变化。大学排行应该围绕“大学发展”的核心指标展开,构建大学发展性排行指标与评估体系。因为只有大学发展了,才能满足多方需求,更好地实现大学排行多种功能。 相似文献
16.
20世纪90年代以来,我国的大学排名活动开展得有声有色,在国内甚至国际有一定影响的大学排名已经有5家。大学排名活动已经成为我国高校评估领域一支不可忽视的力量。同时,对大学排名的研究工作也一直没有停止过。各种有关大学排名的研究文章也构成了高等教育研究中的一个小热点。对有关文章的各种观点从比较、作用、质疑和建议等四个方面进行理论梳理与归纳总结。 相似文献
17.
The assessment of universities in Argentina and Australia: Between autonomy and heteronomy 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：1
The field of university assessment, including quality assurance, is structured by power and conflict, and shaped by technologies of assessment such as self-studyby academic units, numerical performance indicators and whole institution evaluation and ranking. In reconstructing and comparing the recent evolution of assessment practices in Argentina and Australia we detect a common neo-liberal approach to assessment, supported by global agencies such as the World Bank.Assessment policies and practices are used toadvance neo-liberal agendas, often incontradiction with national traditions inhigher education. In both countries moreexternalised and institution-centred forms ofassessment have facilitated the reformedgovernment heteronomy vis-à-vis theuniversities, the rise of business-stylemanagement inside them at the expense ofparticipatory governance, the transformation ofintellectual autonomy into corporate autonomy,and the reduction of diversity and academicindependence. However, some forms of universityassessment can be used to facilitateinternally-controlled reflection withinacademic units, directed towards educationalobjectives. 相似文献
18.
美国大学排行榜透视——兼论对中国大学评价的启示 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
文章分析了《美国新闻与世界报道》(U.S.NEWS&WorldReport)每年推出的大学评价的理论和方法,从分类标准、指标体系、数据来源三个方面对美国大学排行榜进行了剖析,从而总结出三点启示,供我国大学评价活动借鉴。 相似文献
19.
Dyah Kusumastuti 《Quality in Higher Education》2017,23(3):230-248
This paper reviews the recently introduced National Higher Education ranking system in Indonesia in order to evaluate its potential as a sustainable model to improve the quality of higher education in the country. It is a scaffold towards an established world-universities ranking system that may prove formidable for a developing country. This ranking system is based on four quality criteria, namely quality of academics, of management, of research and of students, each with its own weighting factor and scale. It is found that the actions and inactions of institutions vis á vis their continuous quality improvement may reflect their ranks. In countries where the thirst for higher education is high such as in developing countries, institutions’ ranks play a decisive competitive role. A rational, transparent, bona fide and dependable national ranking system is realistic in helping to improve the quality of higher education in the country. 相似文献
20.
Angela Yung-chi Hou 《Asia Pacific Education Review》2012,13(1):77-88
Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT) was established in 2005 and began to accredit 76 four-year
comprehensive universities and colleges in Taiwan in 2006. Commissioned officially with a dual mission, HEEACT has been encouraged
to conduct various ranking research projects, including global and national ones starting in 2007. One of the HEEACT’s most
influential rankings is “Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities.” Given the fact that more and more
national accrediting bodies are developing ranking systems, these dual roles like in the HEEACT case have led to many discussions
and raised severe criticism in the quality assurance community due to their different aims and approaches. Therefore, the
purposes of the paper are to provide an understanding of the functions of varying quality assessment tools in higher education,
to analyze their impact on Taiwan higher education and to examine the conflicting roles of HEEACT while conducting both accreditation
and rankings over the institutions that have been granted the two major national Research and Teaching Excellence Programs. 相似文献