首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 312 毫秒
1.
Legal scholarship's main mode of formal communication, the law journal article, is mostly stuck in the print publishing model. By adopting some tools and practices made possible by digital communications, legal scholarship can become more accessible, flexible, and interdisciplinary. Instructive examples can be found in the science, technology, engineering, and medicine (STEM) journals. These practices are publishing in HTML and e-book formats and adopting persistent identifiers for scholarly works.  相似文献   

2.
现代科学信息交流的体系与服务模式   总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7  
介绍经典科学信息交流体系的几种Ⅰ型模式,提出科学信息交流体系的Ⅱ型模式。论述Ⅱ型模式的5种形式(私人交流、公共域或公共机构仓库、商业性左线出版、非商业性在线出版和作者付费开放出版),认为由于Ⅱ型模式业已形成,传统“纸”链文摘与索引服务模式(即Ⅰ型服务模式)已基本上被取代。  相似文献   

3.
Web technologies have given publishers and researchers alike opportunities to interact in new ways. These have had an impact on business models, the value of formal and informal communication, and the role of publishers in the networked community. This article looks at some recent examples which are likely to set precedents for the future of publishing technologies. In particular, it focuses on the evolution of Web searching, the growing importance of online communities, the potential of Web tools for self‐publishing, and the way in which publishers can control their content even post‐publication. It also suggests that the recent rash of e‐book readers is unlikely to be of importance to scholarly publishing.  相似文献   

4.
不同学术出版模式的特征及其影响研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
随着学术交流方式的演变,传统学术出版模式已经不能有效服务于学术信息的交流和传播,导致不同学术出版模式的产生。学者们的深入研究发现当前情况下出版模式还不可能完全转变,实现理想中的免费且无限制的模式,因此,订阅出版、开放存取和自存档三种学术出版模式并存的同时,还产生了一些混合模式和可选择模式。文章在系统分析订阅出版,开放存取和自存档三种学术出版模式的特征之后,从宏观角度探讨了不同学术出版模式对科研和社会经济产生的影响,并从访问和许可两个角度分析了不同学术出版模式的影响因素和影响机制。该文为2009年第六期“医学OA期刊”专题文章之一。  相似文献   

5.
Given the need for services, various types of group work will continue to prosper as a setting in which older adults can enrich their lives. Simply having membership in a group and engaging in interaction with others improves self‐concept and increases socialization outside the group.

Research in this area includes few contributions from the field of communication. Consequently, this paper suggests the importance of assessing and applying communication constructs to current research on detection and prevention of social isolation through formal group interaction.  相似文献   

6.
夏丹 《图书情报工作》2016,60(22):41-47
[目的/意义]研究以馆社合作的方式进行学术图书出版推广服务,以期提升学术图书的出版质量,促进学术交流与科学传播,推动图书馆与出版社的创新发展。[方法/过程]运用文献调研法、网络调研法,系统分析当前学术图书出版推广所面临的危机与机遇,总结学术图书出版推广国内外图书馆与出版社的合作现状及现有合作中存在的问题,提出馆社合作新模式,并探讨二者在新的合作模式中需解决的问题。[结果/结论]从搭建学术图书出版推广一体化平台、开展学术图书出版素养教育、加强数据合作、制定有效的合作政策、建立长期稳定的资金保障体系、建立良好的沟通协调机制6个方面构建馆社合作模式,使合作更深入、更专业、更高效,能积极促进学术研究成果的产生、传播与共享,推进学科发展与学术繁荣。  相似文献   

7.
The rapid growth of government investment in scientific research in China over past decades has also caused the scholarly publishing industry to go through great changes. Nevertheless, there is a big gap between the state of China's scholarly publishing industry and the current demands of international scientific communication. Globalization and digitization developments are currently widening this gap. Based on desk research, face‐to‐face interviews, observations, and experience, we identify the current business challenges for scholarly publishing in China, and provide a list of suggestions to narrow the gap.  相似文献   

8.
A growing number of online journals and academic platforms are adopting light peer review or ‘publish then filter’ models of scholarly communication. These approaches have the advantage of enabling instant exchanges of knowledge between academics and are part of a wider search for alternatives to traditional peer review and certification processes in scholarly publishing. However, establishing credibility and identifying the correct balance between communication and scholarly rigour remains an important challenge for digital communication platforms targeting academic communities. This paper looks at a highly influential, government‐backed, open publishing platform in China: Science Paper Online, which is using transparent post‐publication peer‐review processes to encourage innovation and address systemic problems in China's traditional academic publishing system. There can be little doubt that the Chinese academic publishing landscape differs in important ways from counterparts in the United States and Western Europe. However, this article suggests that developments in China also provide important lessons about the potential of digital technology and government policy to facilitate a large‐scale shift towards more open and networked models of scholarly communication.  相似文献   

9.
The Internet has been a huge success in the academic world, as it makes it possible for academics to share and find research materials; open access has therefore become a fact of life for academic publishing. But what is the role of publishers in this new environment? The key functions of publishing – organizing peer review, editorial support, graphic design, marketing, and distribution of academic information – do not just disappear; publishers still have a role here, but they need to take a more service‐minded perspective. Academics still need to find ways to ensure the dissemination of their output; it is important that they realize that this will cost money, whether it is brought in‐house or outsourced. The IMISCOE project, on which Amsterdam University Press has recently embarked, offers an entirely new publishing model oriented towards online dissemination of academic research results, as well as in book form.  相似文献   

10.
This paper, a follow‐up to our previous Learned Publishing paper ( http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20130310 ), extends the reporting of new research into the motivations, demographics, processes, and outcomes of self‐publishing authors. The research findings challenge traditionally held notions about the lack of satisfaction in either the process or final product in self‐publishing. By contrast, the authors researched emerged as very satisfied with the process of self‐publishing, likely to do it again and recommend it to others – and these trends were observed across all the demographic categories and types of content. The generally high rate of republishing among the cohort can be taken as further evidence of associated satisfaction. The research offers conclusions that are relevant to all stakeholders in publishing and provides a foundation for more specific research within particular publishing sectors and roles.  相似文献   

11.
This paper describes new research into the motivations, demographics, processes, and outcomes of self‐publishing authors of books. The findings challenge traditionally held notions about self‐publishing being a process undertaken by the untalented, as a last resort. The cohort studied emerges as highly educated, often well informed about the publishing process, and generally very positive about the self‐publishing experience. As the number of people self‐publishing continues to grow and associated technology progresses, a number of fundamental implications for stakeholders in both the non‐fiction and fiction publishing business pipelines are noted. With disintermediation now widespread, there will be increased pressure on the traditional industry to adapt its business models and focus on adding value. At the same time, opportunities in publishing services can be identified and the role of the author is significantly enhanced. Parallels between the cultures and processes of academic and self‐publishing authors are discussed; these will set the scene for future research.  相似文献   

12.
探讨全球科技出版领域呈现的数据密集型出版、语义出版、可视化出版与互动出版等趋势.指出数据密集型出版从宏观层面构建海量数据的框架蓝图,为科学范式的转变提供基础环境;语义出版通过对各种文献进行标引关联,从微观层面铺设结构化数据的基础设施,解决数据和信息的机器理解问题;可视化出版作为重要的直观表达工具,从文献组成部分、文献架构、文献网络三个层面最大限度地提升科研人员获取信息的效率和效果;互动出版目前以学术维基出版物和全新的同行评议为主要特色,既是“无形学院”在网络 环境下的延伸,也渗透于正式科学交流中,从读者和用户层面打破科学信息开放、共享、交流的主要障碍.  相似文献   

13.
刘光裕 《出版科学》2008,16(3):83-87
中国古代的出版概念,是复制和发行两要素说。编辑并非出版诞生的标志,它是出版成熟或趋于成熟的标志。没有编辑的出版活动普遍存在于古代。出版史的研究对象是历史上以公众传播为宗旨,以作者为起点、读者为终点的书籍传播。出版史的研究范围大致是历史上书籍传播过程与在这过程中出现的重要人物、重要事件,以及影响、制约书籍传播的社会历史环境。  相似文献   

14.
There has been much debate recently about whether publishers' prices are too high, and what publishing a journal article really costs. Publication of the article in a journal is only one part of the cost of research communication; first of all there are the costs of research and writing, then the costs of peer review, editing and publication, and finally the costs of acquisition by the library, management, storage, reading by the end user and long‐term preservation. Several studies have been conducted of these different costs; the results are summarized and the potential impact, both on costs and on sources of funds, of moving to an alternative, ‘author‐funded’ open access model is considered.  相似文献   

15.
This paper is based on an Australian government-funded research project looking at the implications of digitization for the book publishing industry, which was originally completed in 2008 and later extended to cover up to the present day. Although Australian-based the project and subsequent research has wider implications for application elsewhere. The paper initially provides a snapshot of Australian book publishing in a global context, and then summarizes our findings on the current and potential future impact of digital technologies. The original research employed an interpretive research paradigm, using a mixed methodology design, including an online survey of book publishers and the conduct of 14 case studies. The extension of the original research project led to its being given a more global dimension. In reporting this new research, the paper discusses in detail the diverse range of technologies, their limitations and the risks and opportunities they offer to the book publishing industry. This includes insights into the business as well as technical issues confronting the industry.  相似文献   

16.
[目的/意义] 通过学术交流生态系统的研究与北京大学学术交流生态系统的初步构建,为高校与科研机构建设学术交流生态系统,推动学术交流和开放获取服务提供研究与实践参考经验。[方法/过程] 梳理学术交流概念、模式、功能与国内外研究发展情况,分析学术交流环境变化,指出开放获取、数据驱动研究范式、软件工具发展、社交媒体、教育教学新变革等因素驱动学术交流生态系统重构。介绍北京大学新一代学术交流生态系统的研究成果、架构设计、构建经验与服务效果,总结机构知识库、研究数据服务、开放出版、学者主页与研究支持服务等建设经验与效果。[结果/结论] 研究提出新一代学术交流生态系统,是以开放学术交流为目标,以学术资源数据汇集为基础,覆盖完整学术交流生命周期,提供研究准备、学术发现、研究与分析、写作、发布、传播与评价等学术交流全流程服务,并利用文献计量、数据挖掘、机器学习等新技术,为教学、科研、科研管理、学科评估等提供支持。总结研究成果和经验,为高校与科研机构建设学术交流生态系统提供有价值的研究与建设参考经验。推动学术交流发展,促进研究创新。  相似文献   

17.
Open access (OA) publishing is now accepted as an integral part of the emerging trends within scholarly communication. Business librarians, like their subject specialist colleagues in other disciplines, are increasingly called upon to interpret scholarly communication trends to their faculty. This study surveys 1,293 business faculty from American schools of business accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. Issues explored include business faculty publishing practices within the discipline and how these affect academic advancement, obtaining articles for their own research, electronic publishing, self-archiving, and their perceptions about OA publishing generally.  相似文献   

18.
提出基于关联数据技术组织用户需求的设想及其架构——需求语义网络模型,该模型由数据层、需求信息层、应用层组成,需求信息层是整个模型的核心,其构建包括需求信息建模、需求信息命名、需求信息RDF化、需求信息发布、开放查询5个步骤,需求语义网络构建的重点和难点包括用户需求及关系的定义与描述、用户需求的关联与分解、需求网络中各层次之间的协作与交流以及匹配服务器的延伸和扩展等,最后,将需求语义网络理论应用到高校图书馆个性化知识服务中,提出基于关联数据的高校图书馆图书需求语义网络的构建模型。  相似文献   

19.
One of the most important issues facing scholarly communication today is what constitutes quality in the publishing and dissemination of research findings; the aim of this exploratory research study was to investigate author‐perceived quality characteristics of science, technology and medicine journals. We triangulated data from a small number of volunteer full‐time faculty members of Long Island University, using three different research techniques: (1) questionnaire survey, (2) focus groups, and (3) semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews. The study identified some significant differences by discipline, gender, and tenure status. Overall, the three most important attributes were the reputation of the journal, the estimated length of time to article publication, and the readership of the journal. Our findings bring new insight into this area for the scholarly research community as a whole.  相似文献   

20.
王卉莲 《出版科学》2012,20(2):94-97
近年来,中韩两国出版交流活动日益频繁。两国出版业之间的合作已由版权贸易向深度资本合作迈进,并取得初步成果。政界、出版学术界人员互访为两国出版交流活动的深入开展,提供了有利契机。书展和出版资助推广项目成为两国出版交流与合作的重要平台。对上述中韩出版交流现状进行深入思考后,提出在国际出版全球化、数字化这一大背景下中韩出版交流的发展设想。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号