共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 277 毫秒
1.
随着现代出版的网络化和数字化,开放存取(Open Access,以下简称OA)的出版模式被越来越多的期刊编辑部所接纳。在国外学术期刊界,期刊的开放存取模式被广泛应用。中国期刊的OA模式起步相对较晚,但在国家相关机构及各个期刊编辑部的通力合作之下,中国期刊已取得了显著的成绩。本文针对中国非医学期刊开放存取的数量、类型、学科分类、上网方式、滞后时间、技术支持等问题进行调研,分析我国非医学期刊的基本现状与整体发展情况,讨论我国非医学期刊在发展过程存在的发展模式、版权、同行评议质量、运营费用等问题,希望能对中国期刊开放存取的发展有所帮助。 相似文献
2.
开放存取是一种基于网络的学术交流与信息传播模式,开放存取出版是开放存取最重要的类型.开放存取期刊是开放存取出版最主要的出版物.与传统期刊相比,开放存取期刊在版权运作策略、作者权利保护、权利许可载体、用户权利内容以及权利瑕疵责任承担原则等方面存在明显差异. 相似文献
3.
开放存取出版施行作者付费制度具有可行性,但是存在增加作者经济负担、提升财政预算压力以及不合理的重复收费等问题.国外的相关对策包括:制定开放存取资助政策、建立开放出版联盟、健全学术评价体系、不断增强期刊的影响力等. 相似文献
4.
期刊评价的主导模式在开放存取期刊出现前就已经建立,现在越来越多的期刊采用开放存取的模式出版。在众多的评价指标中,本文就期刊评价中的常用指标——影响因子在开放存取期刊评价中的应用进行辨析,以理解其在开放存取期刊评价中的意义。 相似文献
5.
国内外开放获取期刊现状调查研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
本文对DOAJ、HighWire出版社期刊开放仓储网络平台、日本科技信息网络电子平台、巴西科学在线图书馆、BioMed Central开放获取期刊网络出版平台等8个知名的期刊数据库/检索平台进行统计,将开放存取期刊按照出版社、ISSN、期刊名称、数据库检索平台、学科分类及出版国家信息以Excel列表。将统计所得的数据与艾利贝斯公司SFX知识库中的开放存取期刊列表去重合并,截止2009年3月,共统计开放存取期刊12531种,并以此数据为基础对国内外开放存取期刊现状进行研究。 相似文献
6.
开放存取期刊的地理分布状况分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
2004年ISI引文数据库、2005年Ulrich期刊指南及2007年开放存取期刊目录中开放存取期刊的统计资料显示：OAJ的出版主要来源于北美及西欧等发达国家,发展中国家也积极参与OAJ的出版。通过揭示开放存取期刊的分布与发展趋势,对我国开放存取期刊的发展现状与对策进行分析,有利于中国的学术资源融入到世界,为实现全球资源共享做出应有的贡献。 相似文献
7.
开放存取期刊版权问题分析 总被引：6，自引：1，他引：6
开放存取期刊是实现开放存取的另一种途径。开放存取期刊作为新生事物有别于传统期刊模式,它的出版模式、发展模式等一系列问题需要进一步的研究和探讨,本文就开放存取期刊的版权问题进行了分析探讨。 相似文献
8.
网络开放存取期刊数据库的分析与利用 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在国外开放存取(OA)的理念下,公网上的国外OA期刊数据库正在逐步增加,OA期刊是各种类型图书馆的资源补充。本文针对网络常用开放存取期刊数据库的收录概况、检索功能、学科专长等进行分析研究,指明利用技巧,旨在使开放存取期刊得到更广泛利用。 相似文献
9.
学术期刊开放存取(Open Access)模式约略可分为四种:"直接开放存取"、"延迟性开放存取"、"部分开放存取"及"复合式开放存取"。本研究以此四种归类执行台湾人文与社会学期刊开放存取模式之主编调查与"复合式开放存取"政策访谈,相较于欧美之发展,2013年研究发现台湾人文与社会学的开放存取期刊模式并非主要型态,社会学类期刊尤为明显。问题显现台湾学者与政府对开放存取期刊政策不明朗,这对于学术出版产业与学界而言,利弊互见。 相似文献
10.
论开放存取期刊的知识产权保护 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
文章阐述了开放存取期刊知识产权的特点,介绍了传统数字化期刊、目前开放存取期刊出版机构和开放存取知识库的知识产权保护策略,就相关保护策略提出了建议. 相似文献
11.
[目的/意义] 随着开放获取运动的持续推进，欧洲部分国家相继开启了国家级开放获取协议制定战略研究。通过研究不同国家开放获取协议内容与特点，以及对全球学术生态的影响，提出我国应对国家级开放获取协议兴起的对策。[方法/过程] 以德国、挪威、法国等国的国家级开放获取协议内容为分析重点，着重介绍分析上述三国国家级开放获取协议的内容、发起背景、愿景目标与主要工作机制；介绍芬兰、瑞典、荷兰、瑞士等国的国家级开放获取进程。基于上述分析，归纳国家级开放获取协议的主要特点以及对全球学术生态的影响。[结果/结论] 无论我国是否采取国家级开放获取协议模式，都应及早建立相关研究并采取应对措施：一是尽快启动我国国家级开放获取协议战略研判工作；二是培育具有全球竞争力的期刊出版商；三是加大对高价值学术期刊的扶持力度；四是积极牵头并组建东亚三国开放获取协议项目组；五是加大对图书馆等文献服务机构的支持力度。 相似文献
12.
Claire Creaser 《New Review of Academic Librarianship》2013,19(1):4-25
This paper presents the results of two complementary surveys undertaken in 2008 as part of a wider project investigating the effects and impact of open access to research outputs in the UK. The institutional view, from a survey of academic librarians, is compared to researchers' perceptions and practices. Researchers were largely unaware of their institutions' policies with regard to open access, or whether they had an institutional repository. Reasons for making research outputs available on open access, or not doing so, were sought, and the role of open access material as a research resource investigated. The surveys found that many researchers maintained a suspicion of open access publications, both as authors and as users of scholarly material, together with a degree of ignorance about open access and the role of institutional repositories. This suggests that a degree of culture change may be needed, as institutions develop repositories with a view to future research assessment requirements, and more funders adopt open access mandates for the outputs from research which they fund. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
Surveys were carried out to learn more about authors and open access publishing. Awareness of open access journals among those who had not published in them was quite high; awareness of ‘self‐archiving’ was less. For open access journal authors the most important reason for publishing in that way was the principle of free access; their main concerns were grants and impact. Authors who had not published in an open access journal attributed that to unfamiliarity with such journals. Forty per cent of authors have self‐archived their traditional journal articles and almost twice as many say they would do so if required to. 相似文献
16.
Business faculty were surveyed to determine their attitudes toward institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, and open access journals. The majority of faculty was unaware of institutional repositories at their local institutions. However, approximately one third are using disciplinary repositories and are receiving encouragement from their departments to do so. Likewise, many faculty are unaware of open access journals. Open access journals are seen as lacking prestige and being lower quality publications in the business field due to the lack of prestigious publishers and editors. Many faculty believe their prestige would fall if they published in an open access journal. 相似文献
17.
The library's role in the management and funding of open access publishing 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Kate LARA 《Learned Publishing》2015,28(1):4-8
This survey presents information on library management of open access resources, institutional involvement in open access funding, and the role librarians see themselves playing in this model in the future. 149 responses from 30 different countries were included. 94% of respondents were librarians, and the remaining 6% consisted of faculty, students, and other library staff. Results showed that most libraries are cataloging open access journals, though they usually represent only 1–5% of total listings. The responsibility for funding open access is more likely to fall on the author or a granting organization than the library or institution. 23% of libraries in this survey help finance open access, and one‐third of these had established criteria for funding. While librarians disagreed on the appropriate level of their involvement in the publishing process and financing of article charges, the majority viewed the library as an important advocate for open access publishing in their institution. 相似文献
18.
开放科学目录收录了迄今为止几乎所有的开放存取期刊。通过对该目录的调查发现,目前开放存取期刊的发展现状并不像人们宣传的那样好,有些期刊只向部分地区开放,有些则须经过一段时滞后用方能获取全文。开放存取期刊的发展尚处于起步阶段,并没有达到黄如花教授所讲的可以与传统期刊相抗衡的地步。本调查研究显示了目前开放存取期刊的整体状况是“部分开放存取期刊多,完全开放存取期刊少;延时开放存取期刊多,即时开放存取期刊少”。由于部分OA和延时OA存在着诸多缺陷,这给我们的启示是,图书馆在进行文献资源建设时既要利用免费的开放存取期刊以充实馆藏,又不能轻易放弃纸质传统期刊的订购。 相似文献
19.
Authors and Open Access： Effective Ways to Achieve OA in China 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
Although there are effective methods available to authors for providing open access to their work, more than half are still not doing so and provision in China is poorer than in many other countries. There are a number of issues and concerns that dissuade authors from making their work open access ： some are still unaware of the concept and of the increased visibility and impact that open access brings; many are unfamiliar with open access journals and how they work; many are uninformed about self-archiving and for some of those who are aware of the possibility of providing open access by this means, concerns about copyright and technical issues remain. Yet all these worries can be addressed with simple facts that reassure and encourage authors to adopt open access to benefit themselves, their research and their teaching. There is also a wealth of resources now available to authors that provide information and advice on open access and its effects. As institutions and research funders, both with a strong interest in maximising the visibility and impact of research they support, begin to develop formal policies on open access, models for its provision are emerging. The optimal model is a network of institution-based open access repositories from which content can be harvested by open access search engines （ the basic＇ no frills＇ variant） or by service providers who add functionality or selectivity to provide users with value-enhanced products. 相似文献