共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
试论学报学术质量的内在影响因素及其对策——以广播电视大学等高职成高学报为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
质量是学报的生命力和生存的基础,学报的学术质量问题是学报工作永恒的主题。影响学报质量的因素是多方面的,可以大致归纳为外在因素和内在因素。我们在分析广播电视大学等高职成高学报学术质量的主要内在影响因素的基础上,提出了相应的对策。 相似文献
2.
学报学术质量为学报所载论文学术质量的算术均值。由此,可知学报学术质量的评估是以学报所载论文学术质量的评估为基准的,学报学术质量的评估指标等价于学报所载论文学术质量的评估指标。 下面是我们建立的这一指标体系。文中所说 相似文献
3.
4.
针对目前高校学报高学术水平稿件流失严重的现状,指出抓编校工作是把好学报质量之脉的关键。以《河北科技大学学报》为例,介绍了提高学报编校质量的一些具体做法。 相似文献
5.
正对于作为学术期刊重要群体的高校学报,人们更愿意关注期刊的学术质量,而忽视编校质量。编校质量是评判一本刊物整体质量的最基础环节,也是最重要环节。在学报改革的浪潮下,学报编校质量是显得尤为关键。2011年,《光明日报》曾经以"高校学报出路何在?"作为系列报道探讨了全国1400多种高校学报的发展之路。在中国大陆9000多种期刊中,社科学术期刊约占四分之一,达到了2800余种。其中,高校社科学报又占 相似文献
6.
浅谈高校学报质量评估浙江医科大学学报严少洁质量是任何一种产品的生命力所在，学报也不例外。要不断提高学报质量，使其在传递高等科技信息中发挥应有的作用，对其质量进行定期的较为科学的评估是完全必要的。通过评估（对影响学报质量所有要素进行统一尺度的测量、分析... 相似文献
7.
作为学术理论刊物的高校学报,应是属子高层次的精神产品,它的活力、功能、价值、效益,一切都取决于它是否能经得起质量的考验。质量是学报的生命所在。因此,学报主编的基本任务,自然是不言自明的了,那就是抓提高学报质量,办好学报。学报主编(或编辑部主任、总编辑)是学报的具体负责人,是办刊治报的核心。他既要负责学报本身的编辑出版工作,又要负责编辑部的领导管理工作(现在不少高校文科学报编委会设有主编、副主编,而实际上 相似文献
8.
拓展稿源是高校学报学术强刊的关键 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
学术质量是高校学报生存的基本问题,而稿源质量是学术质量的关键.针对某些高校学报质量不高的现状,讨论学术创新和刊物特色与学报质量的关系,结合学报优秀稿源流失的现象,提出开发稿源、发展学报的思路.出版实践证明,拓展优秀稿源是学术强刊的重要途径. 相似文献
9.
学报编辑工作是学报得以顺利出版、学报质量赖以提高的有力保证。学报是反映高校教学和科研成果的重要载体。在当前,各种学报在争优评优,而且大量稿件参差不齐的条件下,从某种意义上说,学报编辑工作的优劣直接决定着学报质量的高低。但学报工作的繁琐和被动性造成了学报编辑工作上的疲惫,要改变这种状况,就要发挥学报编辑的工作积极性和主动性,这对于提高学报的办报层次和质量意义重大。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
Cassidy R. Sugimoto Vincent Larivière Chaoqun Ni Blaise Cronin 《Journal of Informetrics》2013,7(4):897-906
There are many indicators of journal quality and prestige. Although acceptance rates are discussed anecdotally, there has been little systematic exploration of the relationship between acceptance rates and other journal measures. This study examines the variability of acceptance rates for a set of 5094 journals in five disciplines and the relationship between acceptance rates and JCR measures for 1301 journals. The results show statistically significant differences in acceptance rates by discipline, country affiliation of the editor, and number of reviewers per article. Negative correlations are found between acceptance rates and citation-based indicators. Positive correlations are found with journal age. These relationships are most pronounced in the most selective journals and vary by discipline. Open access journals were found to have statistically significantly higher acceptance rates than non-open access journals. Implications in light of changes in the scholarly communication system are discussed. 相似文献
13.
《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(1-2):289-298
The purpose of this article is to relate how new technologies are affecting the way scientists and technologists communicate. The discussion includes the origins of the scientific journal, the problems and promise of the contemporary journal and an exploration of developing technologies, such as electronic bibliographic data retrieval, personalized information systems, electronic mail, text editing, teleconferencing, electronic publishing, telefacsimile, optical and laser disc storage with an emphasis on their effect upon scholarly communication in the future. 相似文献
14.
Key points
- The term ‘predatory journal’ hides a wide range of scholarly publishing misconduct.
- The term ‘predatory journal’ unhelpfully bundles misconduct with poor quality.
- The term ‘predatory journal’ blinds us to important possibilities, needs, and questions arising in the developing scholarly landscape.
- The current scholarly publishing environment cannot rely on such a simplified classification of journals into predatory or not.
15.
16.
One of the most important issues facing scholarly communication today is what constitutes quality in the publishing and dissemination of research findings; the aim of this exploratory research study was to investigate author‐perceived quality characteristics of science, technology and medicine journals. We triangulated data from a small number of volunteer full‐time faculty members of Long Island University, using three different research techniques: (1) questionnaire survey, (2) focus groups, and (3) semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews. The study identified some significant differences by discipline, gender, and tenure status. Overall, the three most important attributes were the reputation of the journal, the estimated length of time to article publication, and the readership of the journal. Our findings bring new insight into this area for the scholarly research community as a whole. 相似文献
17.
《Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship》2013,18(1):13-26
Abstract The continual escalation in academic journal prices threatens the quality and future of academic library collections. This situation arises from market forces that react to, and take advantage of, the unique characteristics of academic libraries and scholarly publishing. These characteristics include the unique role of academic libraries, in their mission of serving as accessible repositories of knowledge, and the unique activity of scholarly publishing, in which every journal title is unique without a close substitute. The combination of these of factors leads to the lowest price elasticity of demand for the libraries and the highest degree of product differentiation for each journal title. While some solutions being offered to alter the dilemma hold promise, the unique characteristics of the market appear to discourage more equitable pricing without a radical restructuring of the industry or of the relationships between the consumers and the producers of academic journals. 相似文献
18.
Eti Herman John Akeroyd Gaelle Bequet David Nicholas Anthony Watkinson 《Learned Publishing》2020,33(3):213-229
This article presents an up‐to‐date portrayal of the greatly changed landscape of scholarly journal publishing and identifies the emerging trends characterizing it. We consider the attributes, novelty, and disruptive potential of different models, which range from improvements to the extant model to attempts at reconfiguration and transformation. We propose that journal transition can be seen as falling into three categories. The first is enhanced models of the traditional scholarly journal, which typically afford enriched functionality that breaks the bonds of the printed page whilst otherwise remaining wholly traditional in their offerings. The second category is innovative models of the traditional scholarly journal, which aim at supporting the journal in performing its traditional roles through convention‐altering ways. The third category is the possible alternatives to the traditional journal, which represent a move towards alternative modes of knowledge dissemination. This review shows that each of the models identified makes contributions to enriching the reporting and showcasing of scholarly output. They also make it more effective and more efficient. However, we conclude that none of the possible alternatives being discussed can serve as a full‐fledged alternative to the journal. 相似文献
19.
John Hartley Jason Potts Lucy Montgomery Ellie Rennie Cameron Neylon 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(1):27-35
Much of the argument around reforming, remaking, or preserving the traditions of scholarly publishing is built on economic principles, explicit or implicit. Can we afford open access (OA)? How do we pay for high‐quality services? Why does it cost so much? In this article, we argue that the sterility of much of this debate is a result of failure to tackle the question of what a journal is in economic terms. We offer a way through by demonstrating that a journal is a club and discuss the implications for the scholarly publishing industry. We use examples, ranging from OA to prestige journals, to explain why congestion is a problem for club‐based publications, and to discuss the importance of creative destruction for the maintenance of knowledge‐generating communities in publishing. 相似文献
20.
我国学术期刊影响力评价分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
对学术期刊进行评价不仅是期刊发展的需要,也是对期刊社会功能实现程度的一个检验。学术期刊的学术辐射力和市场占有率不仅是学术期刊影响力的本质特征,也是学术期刊在科研活动、知识加工、知识传播和社会服务中功能和价值的共同体现。对学术期刊影响力进行深层次分析,可以全面、客观地反映学术期刊的学术地位及其国际影响。 相似文献