共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
在1912-1937年间的中国图书馆学学术转型过程中,逐渐出现了北京（北平）、武汉与南京三大地域中心。北京（北平）从一开始便成为图书馆学界力量联合的中心,引领近代图书馆学学术转型的潮流与方向。武汉则因为以培养图书馆人才为职志的文华图书馆学专科学校的成立,成为图书馆学界的教育中心。首都南移之后,南京则逐渐成为了图书馆学界与官方联络的政治中心。三大地域中心的合作与分歧,对民国图书馆学的学术转型产生了重要影响。 相似文献
2.
本文对档案学界及图书馆学界等关于"天府"问题的争论进行了统计分析,提出了自己的观点,列举了一个研究团队三代人对这一问题的研究,并从这一问题出发,提出了关于学术严肃性的反思. 相似文献
3.
在数字化学术图书馆中,对海量非结构化读者相关知识的管理问题开始成为学者感兴趣的研究领域.提出一种基于文本挖掘技术,对读者知识进行管理的具体方案.实验结果表明,该方案能够将读者知识进行有效提取、组织和共享,从而推动数字学术图书馆的知识管理水平和能力. 相似文献
4.
5.
研究型大学学科馆员知识服务的条件支撑与保障 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
文章在探讨研究型大学图书馆知识服务价值效应的基础上,对图书馆知识服务的条件建设问题进行了研究,认为学科馆员的资质条件、专业学科的特色馆藏和图书馆数字化网络化技术条件是知识服务的前提和基础,建立知识服务的制度体系、激励机制以及学术组织是知识服务有效运行的根本保障。 相似文献
6.
就图书馆学学术期刊的规范问题从学术规范的意义、学术失范、对图书馆界的负面影响及图书馆学学术规范的对策等方面进行探讨，以唤起图书馆学界对学术规范问题的意识。 相似文献
7.
中国图书馆学研究探微 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
图书馆学界关于中国图书馆学的研究，随着图书馆事业的发展而不断深化和展开。本文主要综述了图书馆学研究的历史脉络和学术成果，指出这一领域的研究存在的问题，并对其发展提出若干意见和建议。 相似文献
8.
扫描2007年度图书馆学界所关注的热点和重点,针对图书馆核心价值、知识自由与信息公平、图书馆学教育研究、图书馆法治、信息组织、数字图书馆、公共图书馆服务体系、用户研究、图书馆2.0和社会阅读等10个方面的研究进行述评。 相似文献
9.
基础理论研究中两个新的生长点:知识自由和信息公平 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
扫描2007年度图书馆学界所关注的热点和重点,针对图书馆核心价值、知识自由与信息公平、图书馆学教育研究、图书馆法治、信息组织、数字图书馆、公共图书馆服务体系、用户研究、图书馆2.0和社会阅读等10个方面的研究进行述评。 相似文献
10.
图书馆学界学人在弘扬公共图书馆精神,保障公众的知识和信息获取权益,维持版权和用户之间的利益平衡等方面进行了一系列不懈的努力,其学术地位似乎并没有因此而得到明显的改善。处于“有为”却“无位”的尴尬境地。究其原因,图书馆学人在公共学术平台——“公共核心期刊”上发文偏少是重要原因之一。图书馆学学者们应充分利用公共学术平台,多多争取在“公共核心期刊”上发文,大力推广图书馆学学术成果和学术思想,在潜移默化中,不断扩大图书馆学的学术影响力,从而使得图书馆学的“有为”与“有位”趋于统一。 相似文献
11.
Michael R. Hagan 《Communication Studies》2013,64(3):192-199
Court decisions themselves, and not just arguments before courts, are rhetorical works. The Supreme Court majority opinion in the publicized 1973 abortion case Roe v. Wade demonstrated this rhetorical nature of decisions both in its choice of arguments and evidence and in its effort to organize symbolically the world of the medical and legal considerations surrounding abortion. 相似文献
12.
This study illustrates the potential role of model and anti-model arguments in organizational crisis communication. Specifically, model and anti-model arguments are described as a strategy for moving the focus of a crisis from an organization to its industry. Model arguments enable organizations to establish their corrective action as industry standards that merit imitation. Conversely, organizations can set minimum standards for their industries with anti-model arguments. Phil Knight's May 12, 1998, speech announcing Nike's new initiatives in global manufacturing is analyzed as a case study. The essay concludes that model and anti-model arguments can suspend criticism of the organization, create the foundation for a return to industry prominence by the organization, and establish proposed new industry standards that are favorable to the organization. 相似文献
13.
Rick Garlick 《Communication Studies》2013,64(3-4):273-284
The study examines the relationship between positional minorities, social minorities (i.e., African‐Americans and women) and the evaluations of persuasive arguments within the context of hypothetical small groups. Specifically, the study predicted that positional majority arguments would be evaluated most positively when identified with social minorities and that positional minority arguments would be evaluated least positively when identified with social minorities. Results demonstrated that when majority arguments were attributed to an African‐American spokesperson, they were evaluated more favorably than when the spokesperson was European‐American. However, spokesperson race did not influence evaluations of minority arguments. Spokesperson gender also did not influence argument evaluations for either position. 相似文献
14.
因《汉书.艺文志》名家载《公孙龙子》,而《隋书.经籍志》未载,故清人姚际恒疑其伪书,进而《公孙龙子》中的《白马论》亦成伪书。自此之后,学界多有争论。黄云眉提出进一步论据支持姚说,然而更多的学者论证《白马论》为真书。本文评述了双方所给出的主要论据,并指出现有之论据尚不足以鉴定《白马论》之真伪。 相似文献
15.
Shira Dvir Gvirsman 《Mass Communication and Society》2014,17(1):74-97
Today audiences can select content that is consonant with their political notions, and they take advantage of this opportunity. Such partisan selective exposure to media outlets has been identified as one of the reasons for attitude polarization. Little research attention, however, has been devoted to the processes underlying this phenomenon. This article advances the understanding of selective exposure by testing whether its effect on attitude polarization is attributable to people's familiarity with arguments that reinforce or challenge their own opinions. A sample of politically engaged extremists (N = 440) was subjected to a structured interview. As hypothesized, users of partisan media were more familiar with arguments reinforcing their views and, as a result, more prone to polarization. Knowledge of challenging arguments, however, was not affected by consumption of partisan media, nor did it promote depolarization. Results are discussed in light of two conflicting theories: the persuasion and the motivational-reasoning model. 相似文献
16.
Albert Henderson 《Publishing Research Quarterly》1990,6(3):81-88
In the Winter 1990 issue of BRQ, Frederick C. Lynden outlined a strategy for justifying library materials budgest based on
his experience at Brown University. Albert Henderson elaborates on this process by offering three additional arguments to
justify increased funding at research libraries. These arguments are based on the accelerating publication rate, the shrinking
of library budgets as a percentage of GNP, and the consequences for research of inadequate library holdings.
Albert Henderson, presidents of Henderson Associates is a consultant to scholarly and professional publishers. He was previously
an editor with Johnson Reprint and vice-president for marketing and production with Pergamon Press. 相似文献
17.
《Communication methods and measures》2013,7(1):48-75
Studies of the content of persuasive messages in which the central arguments of the message are scrutinized have traditionally relied on the technique of thought-listing to assess argument strength. Although the validity of the thought-listing procedure is well documented, its utility can be limited in situations involving nonadult populations and sensitive topics. In this paper, we present a self-reported scale that can be used to assess perceived argument strength in contexts where thought-listing may be less appropriate. This scale taps into perceived argument strength from multiple points of view, including but also extending beyond the potential of the argument to elicit positive and negative thoughts. Reliability and validity of this scale were assessed in health communication contexts involving anti-drug public service announcements (PSAs) directed at adolescents and anti-smoking PSAs targeting adults. Evidence of convergence between this scale and the thought-listing technique was also obtained using the classical comprehensive exam arguments. 相似文献
18.
在五四新文化运动前后频繁的学术、思想论争中,一些知识分子开始产生了关于论争规范的意识;这也影响到他们所参加参与的报刊编辑业务。这些思考和实践,是我们今天重建论争规范的宝贵思想资源。 相似文献
19.
Serial arguing has mainly been studied in the context of close relationships. This study generalizes those theories and findings to the context of classrooms. Respondents (N = 348) reported on serial arguments they had experienced either in college or in high school classes. High school serial arguments were more brutish than those in college. Resolvability was positively associated with classroom climate and arguers' civility. Approach and avoidance motives predicted the degree to which a range of arguers' goals come into play, and the goals predicted the tactics in use. The tactics, in turn, predicted the resolvability, climate, and civility of the serial arguments. 相似文献
20.
《Communication monographs》2012,79(4):348-356
This research examined the effects of nine probability qualifier terms upon respondents’ acceptance of the claims of arguments. Studies compared the responses of high school upperclassmen and college undergraduates to the qualifiers presented in arguments and presented by themselves. The results are discussed in relation to the analyses of Stephen Toulmin and other language philosophers and a general model of probability in argument. Some results for both sample groups were consistent with previous research, but the “no qualifier” results were contrary to previous analyses. The probability meanings associated with the qualifiers differed noticeably when presented outside of arguments. 相似文献