想象力与康德认识论     

张秉福 《柳州师专学报》2005,20(1):117-120

:想象力在康德的认识论中是一个不可或缺的要素,发挥着独特的功能:一方面它把感性和知性这两种必要而又功能各异的认识能力联结起来,另一方面它产生的先验图型又把直观和概念这两种不同的知识要素结合起来,从而使知识得以可能.因此想象力尤其是生产性的想象力在康德的整个认识论中占有非常重要的地位.  相似文献   

现代西方神学美学与康德审美理论     

雷礼锡 《襄樊学院学报》2008,29(7)

康德审美理论是其批判哲学体系的重要组成部分。康德审美理论所蕴含的深刻神学意涵对西方现代神学美学发展产生了直接的影响,如巴尔塔萨、海德格尔、谢瑞等重要代表人物的神学美学思想无不与康德审美理论存在密切联系。  相似文献   

语言、造型和感觉游戏：康德的艺术分类观——康德美学思想研究之三     

王朝元 《教育文化论坛》2011,3(3):52-55

对艺术分类问题的研究,由来已久。康德对艺术分类问题的研究,对美的艺术的范畴的界定,建立在前人和同时代人研究基础之上。对艺术加以分类除了首先必须明确界定美的艺术与非艺术之外,还须确立各门艺术所具有的共同审美特征和艺术分类的统一原则。确立了审美的原则的同时,也就建立了艺术分类的统一原则的基础。康德将艺术分为语言艺术、造型艺术和感觉游戏的艺术。康德的艺术分类原则看到了艺术中感性与知性的相结合和协调一致性。康德的艺术分类原则,重视感性与知性的协调,内在原则与外在原则的会通,既反映了其＂形式的合目的性＂的审美原则,又体现了其二律背反的思辨原则。  相似文献   

Misunderstanding duty: Vices of culture, ‘aggravated’ vice,and the role of casuistical questions in moral education     

Kate A. Moran 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2019,51(13):1361-1371

Abstract

This paper considers the role of ‘vices of culture’ in Immanuel Kant’s account of radical evil and education. I argue that Kant was keenly aware of a uniquely human tendency to allow a self-centered concern for status to misunderstand or co-opt the language of dignity and equal worth for its own purposes. This tendency lies at the root of the ‘vices of culture’ and ‘aggravated vices’ that Kant describes in the Religion and Doctrine of Virtue, respectively. When it comes to moral education, then, it will be crucial that the developing agent have a clear understanding of the shared dignity of rational agents and the particular duties (e.g. gratitude and beneficence) that are defined, in part, by their tendency to alter (a different kind of) status among agents. I argue that the casuistical questions that Kant attaches to these discussions in the Doctrine of Virtue are an example of a pedagogical device that might help pupils to overcome this tendency so closely associated with radical evil.  相似文献   

从康德的"物自身"到儒家道德的形上学     

王洁  鹿士义 《徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2002,28(1):103-107

在康德的哲学中，“物自身”是一个价值意味的概念，部分新儒家接受了这一概念，并将之与作传统儒家哲学中的“本心”、“本仁”等概念汇通思考，最终力图证明道德的形上学的成立，从而实现其道德关怀。  相似文献   

康德、黑格尔主体哲学的内在困境     

龚群 《安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2001,29(2):167-171

近代哲学是以主体为中心的哲学。康德哲学和黑格尔哲学都是主体中心性的哲学。然面而，康德的主体中心性学和如果离开了交互主体性理解，就是不可思议的。但康德的交互主体性思想被束缚于他的主体性原则的视域内。黑格尔哲学力图跳出康德哲学的纯粹思辩的、主观性的局限，但他由于最终始有发展出一个交互主体性的视域，同样没有超出这种内在局限性。  相似文献   

康德美学的审美救赎之途     

徐蔚 《哈尔滨学院学报》2007,28(8):68-70

韦伯认为世俗化是信仰消解的内驱力。当下,质感的、非理性的审美世俗化倾向使"审美的乌托邦"濒临危机,在宗教伦理没落的地方,人类的精神当归属何处?康德说:"我们的时代是真正的批判的时代,一切事物都必须接受批判。"那么,我们对时代是否也应该进行反思了。  相似文献   

自由与自律:康德道德教育思想研究     

王啸 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2008,(1):33-41

康德的道德教育思想与其批判哲学有着密切的关系。在区分自然与自由的基础上,康德认为道德和道德教育属于自由的领域,自律是道德教育的惟一法则,而"人是目的"则是道德教育的最高指向,与此相应,在道德教育中应采用苏格拉底式的方法。康德道德教育思想中所蕴含的尊重人的理念对人类教育产生了深远的影响。  相似文献   

试论康德美学的"判断在先"原则   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

李伟 《安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2003,31(4):407-413

"判断在先"原则是康德美学体系的"钥匙",康德美学诸要义均可由此生发出来。这也是康德美学先验人类学立场的集中体现。  相似文献   

Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust     

Annamaria Carusi 《Ethics and Information Technology》2008,10(4):243-254

The collaborative ‹Big Science’ approach prevalent in physics during the mid- and late-20th century is becoming more common in the life sciences. Often computationally mediated, these collaborations challenge researchers’ trust practices. Focusing on the visualisations that are often at the heart of this form of scientific practice, the paper proposes that the aesthetic aspects of these visualisations are themselves a way of securing trust. Kant’s account of aesthetic judgements in the Third Critique is drawn upon in order to show that the image-building capability of imagination, and the sensus communis, both of which are integral parts of aesthetic experience, play an important role in building and sustaining community in these forms of science. Kant’s theory shows that the aesthetic appeal of scientific visualisations is not isolated from two other dimensions of the visualisations: the cognitive-epistemic, aesthetic-stylistic and interpersonal dimensions, and that in virtue of these inter-relationships, visualisations contribute to building up the intersubjectively shared framework of agreement which is basic for trust.  相似文献