科学技术活动的指标、模型与推论     

谷兴荣 《评价与管理》2006,(1)

科学技术活动的指标、数学模型等问题是一个讨论多年而未解决的问题,本文从科学技术活动的投入产出角度提出了相应的指标系列;并从科学技术投入产出的一因一果关系、多因一果关系、多因多果关系、线性与非线性关系等方面提出了相应的数学模型及定义定理;最后,根据这些定义定理,提出了科学技术发展在正常时期 (继承发展时期)和非常时期(转化、革命时期)的有关推论。  相似文献   

Chinese Studies Librarianship in North America   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

KarenT.Wei 《图书情报工作》2004,48(12):31-34

Although American libraries had begun collecting Chinese language materials in the 19th century, notably the United States Library of Congress in 1869, Yale in 1878, Harvard in 1879, and Berkeley in 1896, East Asian studies librarianship in North America, including China studies librarianship, was not fully developed until the 1960s. There was no formal organization that represented the interest of Chinese studies librarians because there were few of them and most of them were China scholars rather than trained librarians. More than 100 years later, the number of Chinese studies librarians in North America has increased considerably, primarily in response to the demand in the field of China studies and more recently to the needs of immigrant population and the general public who has an interest in China.This paper traces the history and growth of Chinese studies librarianship in North America, documents the development of the professional organization that represents Chinese studies librarians, and exami.  相似文献   

网上外文科技期刊最新论文题录保障系统的研制     

骆达荣 《图书情报工作》2004,48(3):93-94

介绍网上外文科技期刊最新论文题录保障系统的研制目标、总体结构及主要功能,着重阐述系统自动下载和自动标 引的实现方法。  相似文献   

论树立高校图书馆科学发展观   总被引：20，自引：2，他引：20  

周世辟 《图书馆论坛》2004,24(6):50-53

在近几年快速发展的基础上，高校图书馆要树立科学的发展观念，以人为本，与社会经济发展相适应，与高等教育发展同步，尊重图书馆办馆规律，使高校图书馆快速健康发展。  相似文献   

我国社区图书馆的现状及其对策   总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5  

周大海 《四川图书馆学报》2004,(6):33-36

分析了我国社区图书馆建设出现的新问题，并提出相应的解决方法，包括加快公共图书馆立法，尽快出台“中国社区乡镇图书馆建设标准”；树立科学发展观，走多途径、多元化的办馆之路；提倡建设特色社区图书馆。  相似文献   

立足学科特色 增强核心竞争力 推进北京化工大学一流学科建设     

谭天伟 《高等工程教育研究》2018,(6):87-91

Tan Tianwei  相似文献   

高校教师视角下的人文社会科学国际发表及其激励制度     

许心  蒋凯 《高等教育研究》2018,(1):43-55

在学术国际化和中国哲学社会科学"走出去"的背景下,越来越多的高校对教师发表SSCI和A&HCI论文进行激励。激励制度主要体现在物质奖励和学术评价两个层面。从对国内某研究型大学文科教师深度访谈的情况来看,高校教师对人文社会科学国际发表及其激励制度持不同意见,虽一般不反对对国际发表进行物质奖励,但他们对国际发表在学术评价中的地位的认识存在较大分歧。高校在实施人文社会科学国际发表激励制度的过程中应理解和尊重差异性的存在,关注国际化与本土化的平衡。  相似文献   

国际工程技术专业人才认证及启示     

王秋惠  冯志友  王家庭 《高等工程教育研究》2018,(1):111-117,130

目前,工程技术人才国际化认证已成为很多国家人才战略规划的重要组成部分。如何根据国情选择性实施工程技术人才的国际认证体系,对于推进我国工程强国战略有重要的意义。课题研究对工程技术人才国际认证体系及英美德日四个工程强国认证状况进行了系统梳理,深入分析国际工程联盟IEA旗下的国际工程师认证IPEA、国际工程技师认证IETA、亚太工程师认证APEC、国际工程技术认证AIET四大工程技术专业人才认证体系及欧洲工程师认证体系EUR-ING的建立背景、认证程序及认证规范。同时,对美国、欧洲、英国、德国、日本及俄罗斯工程技术专业人才国际认证状况进行了深入调查。从比较的视角,对我国工程专业技术人才国际化认证中面对的挑战和机遇进行剖析,提出我国工程技术专业人才国际认证分步实施的思路及发展蓝图:在执行高等工程教育国际认证华盛顿协议、悉尼协议及都柏林协议的基础上,开展IEA旗下IPEA、IETA和AIET三个工程技术人才的国际化认证。首先从世界一流目标高校及国有大中型企业开始进行国际认证,其次,进一步开启我国地方特色院校及特色产业国际工程技术人才认证。  相似文献   

基于“4I”的工程人才培养模式改革     

王迎军  李正  项聪 《高等工程教育研究》2018,(2):15-19,29

高等工程教育正面临着来自外部和内部的双重挑战,大学需要从学科、产业、社会、人才成长等四个维度重构以学生为中心的工程学习共同体。华南理工大学以高端工程科技人才培养为目标,以"4I"(交叉复合、产学研合作、国际化教学、深度工程学习)为路径,推进工程人才培养模式改革,取得了显著成效。  相似文献   

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation     

Theocharis Katrakazis  Cath Dillon  Petra Juvan  Stavroula Golfomitsou 《文物保护研究》2018,63(8):450-465

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.  相似文献