《中国图书馆学报》(1994-2005年)核心著者的测评   总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9  

姚红 《图书馆论坛》2006,26(5):30-33

依据发文量和被引量两个计量指标，利用综合指数法测评《中国图书馆学报》（1994-2005年）的核心著者。  相似文献   

近六年《江西图书馆学刊》载文、引文及作者分析   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

房艳焱  罗式胜 《江西图书馆学刊》2004,34(1):24-27

以《江西图书馆学刊》1998～2003年载、引、被引及作情况为研究对象，分析了载的数量、栏目和所占页数，引的数量、来源、语种和年代，载被引情况以及作的单位分布和作数量，从而反映出该刊近六年的栽情况及学术影响。  相似文献   

Could scientists use Altmetric.com scores to predict longer term citation counts?     

Mike Thelwall  Tamara Nevill 《Journal of Informetrics》2018,12(1):237-248

Altmetrics from Altmetric.com are widely used by publishers and researchers to give earlier evidence of attention than citation counts. This article assesses whether Altmetric.com scores are reliable early indicators of likely future impact and whether they may also reflect non-scholarly impacts. A preliminary factor analysis suggests that the main altmetric indicator of scholarly impact is Mendeley reader counts, with weaker news, informational and social network discussion/promotion dimensions in some fields. Based on a regression analysis of Altmetric.com data from November 2015 and Scopus citation counts from October 2017 for articles in 30 narrow fields, only Mendeley reader counts are consistent predictors of future citation impact. Most other Altmetric.com scores can help predict future impact in some fields. Overall, the results confirm that early Altmetric.com scores can predict later citation counts, although less well than journal impact factors, and the optimal strategy is to consider both Altmetric.com scores and journal impact factors. Altmetric.com scores can also reflect dimensions of non-scholarly impact in some fields.  相似文献   

Impact Factors and the Central Limit Theorem: Why citation averages are scale dependent     

Manolis Antonoyiannakis 《Journal of Informetrics》2018,12(4):1072-1088

Citation averages, and Impact Factors (IFs) in particular, are sensitive to sample size. Here, we apply the Central Limit Theorem to IFs to understand their scale-dependent behavior. For a journal of n randomly selected papers from a population of all papers, we expect from the Theorem that its IF fluctuates around the population average μ, and spans a range of values proportional to $\sigma /\sqrt{n}$, where σ² is the variance of the population's citation distribution. The $1/\sqrt{n}$ dependence has profound implications for IF rankings: The larger a journal, the narrower the range around μ where its IF lies. IF rankings therefore allocate an unfair advantage to smaller journals in the high IF ranks, and to larger journals in the low IF ranks. As a result, we expect a scale-dependent stratification of journals in IF rankings, whereby small journals occupy the top, middle, and bottom ranks; mid-sized journals occupy the middle ranks; and very large journals have IFs that asymptotically approach μ. We obtain qualitative and quantitative confirmation of these predictions by analyzing (i) the complete set of 166,498 IF & journal-size data pairs in the 1997–2016 Journal Citation Reports of Clarivate Analytics, (ii) the top-cited portion of 276,000 physics papers published in 2014–2015, and (iii) the citation distributions of an arbitrarily sampled list of physics journals. We conclude that the Central Limit Theorem is a good predictor of the IF range of actual journals, while sustained deviations from its predictions are a mark of true, non-random, citation impact. IF rankings are thus misleading unless one compares like-sized journals or adjusts for these effects. We propose the Φ index, a rescaled IF that accounts for size effects, and which can be readily generalized to account also for different citation practices across research fields. Our methodology applies to other citation averages that are used to compare research fields, university departments or countries in various types of rankings.  相似文献   

学报创办60期誌言     

《潍坊教育学院学报》编辑部 《潍坊教育学院学报》2006,19(2):103-104

本文认真回顾思考创办院刊学报19年60期来的经验,总结在农村基层办教育学术期刊的特殊规律和做法,并分析此类杂志在新时期所面临的挑战及对策。  相似文献   

编辑应重视对修改稿的复审     

陆宜新 《编辑学报》2016,28(1):34-36

为了解《山东医药》近6年刊载文章统计学方法的应用情况,并对存在的问题提出意见和建议,随机抽取《山东医药》2009-2014年发表的论文进行统计学方法系统分析.结果发现统计学错误最常见的是t检验代替方差分析、不注明所用的统计学方法和不具体写出统计值.认为医学论文作者要充分认识统计学的重要性,编辑部应加强统计学方法审查工作.  相似文献   

关于社科学报规范化建设的几点思考     

赵凤媛  郭丽云 《山西广播电视大学学报》2001,6(3):45-47

社科学报编辑编排的规范化是全面提高刊物质量，促进社科献在网络化、数字化环境下快速交流与传播的必要要求。关于“作工作单位和作简介、关键词与主题词的关系、注释与参考献的标注“三个问题的规范是目前学报规范化建设中困难而争议较多的问题，当引起学报界同仁的关注。  相似文献   

高校学报体制改革实践——以《北京航空航天大学学报》为例     

李晶  张嵘 《编辑学报》2016,28(6):565-568

《北京航空航天大学学报》于2013年8月进行体制改革,采取学术与出版分离的办刊模式.文章以此为例,阐述实施方案、实践过程中的困难、解决措施,以及改革后的效果和变化,为探索更加科学有效的科技期刊改革方案提供参考.  相似文献   

美英两国教育软件的开发与应用     

尹发跃 《中国教育技术装备》2006,(7):69-71

介绍和分析以美、英为代表的西方现代教育技术发展中的教育软件研发、使用及相关政策保障，为我国教育发展提供了有益的启示。  相似文献   

期刊网站页面自适应分析及重构     

于孟晨  潘秋岑  张立新 《出版科学》2016,24(4):105-110

基于响应式网页设计的理念、特点,对比分析传统期刊网站与响应式网页设计的价值特性,以“用户为中心”对期刊网站在个人电脑和不同移动设备平台上的文字、图片及控件等信息进行自适应分析及重构设计,为期刊用户在移动设备上访问期刊网站提供新的解决方案和参考,对于期刊网站的建设具有较好的实践意义和指导意义。  相似文献